User talk:Kringe1

October 2013

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Toontown Online because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 03:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Backyard Football has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Backyard Football was changed by Kringe1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946183 on 2014-02-05T01:22:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toontown Online, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toontown

Hi Kringe1,

I appreciate the time and effort you put in the article on Toontown Online. A question though: have you taken the time to read the guidelines? Despite your hard work and accomplishments, there is still room for improvement, like the edit I've just made. You might also want to check the video game article guidelines too, since it is a video game. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 11:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Soetermans

Thanks for the input. I'm still a bit new to all this stuff, yeah I'll read the guidelines. As for the edits you made with the bold text, I saw something similar on another article, so I thought that it was okay. Now I know, thanks. Kringe1 (talk) 22:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime! Wikipedia is easy to learn, hard to master. I've been editing for... Wow, I had to look it up, and it's seventeen days short of eight years. That's crazy! But I'm still jearning new things, it's kind of like a bureaucracy here.

Common names and bolding stuff is tricky. For instance, some users don't think it's appropriate to add it GTA V to Grand Theft Auto V, while the ridiculously long Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots does mention the common abbreviation MGS4. I've had disagreements with another user over adding War3, WC3, WCIII and RoC to the article on Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos. It's a fine line between game magazines and websites and fanboys on the internet, but I think in this case you can easily start using Toontown and Toontown Online after the lead. Like BioShock Infinite uses Infinite or The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time uses Ocarina of Time.

By the way, is the actual title Toontown Online or Disney's Toontown Online? Because there are articles like American McGee's Alice or a whole bunch of games starting with the tile Sid Meier's.... If Disney's is part of the actual title, we could move it to a new article name. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 12:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guidelines again. And I think It should be Toontown Online, not Disney's, because if you look at some of the other MMOs dinsey created - Pirates of the Caribbean Online, Club Penguin, Pixie Hollow - non of these have "Disney's" in their name. I think placeing "Disney's" in Toontown Online is sometimes said because it doesn't sound awkward when done. However, when you look at those other MMOs I listed, placing "Disney's" before those titles makes the title of the games themselves hard to say, so they were not said [oftenly, at least]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

Hello, I'm Piano Cake. Regarding the article Toontown Online (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toontown_Online), I want to ask why you undid some of my edits on the article. Though after revising it and realising I added a few unnecessary details, surely there has to be a few parts that are useful! I hope you can tweak my edits as I do feel that some of my added information was necessary. Thank you. Piano cake (talk) 04:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piano cake

Thanks for the barnstar! I'm sorry I reverted your whole edit. I saw that a lot of the verbs were being changed from from past tense to present, and some recent edits I reverted were similar so I assumed the rest was the same.

The problem with the Toontown Online article in general however is that it needs a huge cleanup. Little details like each fact about fighting a VP, CFO, CJ, or CEO, and multiple sections (cog invasions, buildings, bosses, battles) for everything just clutters the page up. I think it should just have a few subsections under Gameplay, because honestly if I didn't play the game before it closed I wouldn't understand it by reading the Toontown Online article. I've tried editing the article before but I can never think of a perfect way to rearrange the sections so everything just flows. If you'd be willing to help me with that, maybe we could try and get this article to good article status.Kringe1 (talk) 06:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kringe1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]