User talk:GenSQuantum: Difference between revisions
→January 2020: Thanks |
GenSQuantum (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The majority of independent scientists do have a neutral point of view, as do I. That is why it is a fact that Human induced Global warming is purely political science, please attempt to substantiate the claim with empirical evidence. Thank you - GenSQuantum |
The majority of independent scientists do have a neutral point of view, as do I. That is why it is a fact that Human induced Global warming is purely political science, please attempt to substantiate the claim with empirical evidence. Thank you - GenSQuantum |
||
:Thanks for confirming your inherent bias. Wikipedia follows what [[WP:RS|independent, reliable sources]] say, not the opinions of individual editors like yourself. [[User:The Mirror Cracked|The Mirror Cracked]] ([[User talk:The Mirror Cracked|talk]]) 00:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
:Thanks for confirming your inherent bias. Wikipedia follows what [[WP:RS|independent, reliable sources]] say, not the opinions of individual editors like yourself. [[User:The Mirror Cracked|The Mirror Cracked]] ([[User talk:The Mirror Cracked|talk]]) 00:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
No thank you for clarifying your own inherent bias, facts are irrefutable. Water vapor is the driving contributor of climate, not carbon dioxide. |
|||
Political science is absurd. Misleading people must be your priority, well done in that regard. Congratulations. |
|||
Revision as of 00:34, 14 January 2020
January 2020
Hello, I'm The Mirror Cracked. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Greenhouse gas seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
The majority of independent scientists do have a neutral point of view, as do I. That is why it is a fact that Human induced Global warming is purely political science, please attempt to substantiate the claim with empirical evidence. Thank you - GenSQuantum
- Thanks for confirming your inherent bias. Wikipedia follows what independent, reliable sources say, not the opinions of individual editors like yourself. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
No thank you for clarifying your own inherent bias, facts are irrefutable. Water vapor is the driving contributor of climate, not carbon dioxide. Political science is absurd. Misleading people must be your priority, well done in that regard. Congratulations.