Jump to content

Talk:Rape in Islamic law: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
comment add unbelievers
Rape of slaves: new section
Line 13: Line 13:
==Add info about unbelievers==
==Add info about unbelievers==
I think this article may be missing what Islamic laws say regarding the rape of unbelievers. [[User:Thinker78|Thinker78]] ([[User talk:Thinker78|talk]]) 22:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I think this article may be missing what Islamic laws say regarding the rape of unbelievers. [[User:Thinker78|Thinker78]] ([[User talk:Thinker78|talk]]) 22:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

== Rape of slaves ==

the article goes to great lengths to ''''not'''' spell out what Islamic Law thinks about the rape of slaves, even though we can guess it from peripheral parts. This is unencyclopedic [[User:Wefa|Wefa]] ([[User talk:Wefa|talk]]) 02:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:31, 5 March 2019

Move article?

Shouldn't this article be called "Rape in Islamic law"? At a glance, Azam's book seems to use "sexual violation" in the title, but mostly "rape" in the body, and it doesn't look like she discusses other types of sexual violation. The blurb begins "This book provides a detailed analysis of Islamic juristic writings on the topic of rape..." The other sources overwhelmingly use the term "rape". Eperoton (talk) 21:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Al-Andalusi (talk) 17:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add info about unbelievers

I think this article may be missing what Islamic laws say regarding the rape of unbelievers. Thinker78 (talk) 22:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rape of slaves

the article goes to great lengths to 'not' spell out what Islamic Law thinks about the rape of slaves, even though we can guess it from peripheral parts. This is unencyclopedic Wefa (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]