Jump to content

User talk:Littleolive oil: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DumbBOT (talk | contribs)
removing a protection template from a non-protected page (info)
Hagelin: new section
Line 126: Line 126:


The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#rfc_BD8EA96|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 51265 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#rfc_BD8EA96|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 51265 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

== Hagelin ==

Hello, I've added the connected contributor template to [[Talk:John Hagelin]]. Leaving this message this seems like a damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't situation. Informing you could be interpreted as a provocation, given your earlier reaction, while not informing you would seem rude. If you'd rather not be notified in the future then I'll respect that; whatever you wish. Earlier you asked: Why now? In other words, when is the best time to follow the consensus of the community on [[WP:COI]]? My answer is: How about now? Regards, ''[[User:Manul|Manul]] ~ [[User talk:Manul|talk]]'' 21:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:59, 28 August 2016

For your very kind words. Penyulap


WP:RETENTION This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.



GOCE March drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update

GOCE March 2012 Backlog Elimination progress graphs

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter.

Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us!

Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far.

Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers.

Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

test

GOCE February blitz wrapup

Guild of Copy Editors Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2014 wrap-up

Participation: Out of seven people who signed up for this blitz, all copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 16 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:In the news/2016 RD proposal. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News

Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter.

June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part.

Coordinator elections: The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected. Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged.

July Drive: Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Marilyn Monroe?

Hello,

I was wondering whether you'd like to give me some feedback on Marilyn Monroe's article, especially on how to avoid gender bias? I was lurking in the Catherine Zeta-Jones FAC thread earlier and saw your thoughtful comments, and that Marilyn Monroe was also mentioned as an example of an article with issues by another editor. I was at first a bit surprised since I consider myself a feminist and because I started overhauling the article a year ago precisely because I wished the article to avoid the sexist clichés about Monroe (i.e. that she was either a dumb blonde or a vulnerable victim with no input in her own career) and to give a multifaceted view of her that reflects current scholarship. However, as I went back to re-read the article, I started noticing ways in which it could be more neutral, and have since worked to fix these issues. I would be grateful for feedback from someone who is also concerned about gender bias, and since I liked your feedback on CZJ, thought to ask you :) I completely understand if you're too busy though! TrueHeartSusie3 (talk) 21:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3[reply]

Thank you for the reply – don't worry about not being able to give feedback soon, I'm not in a hurry, in fact I'm still making some adjustments to the article. Enjoy your trip :) TrueHeartSusie3 (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3[reply]

10 July

10 July

Took only 300 years to restore a good name. - Thank you for your work on the article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC

Working on Grace Sherwood under the direction of Rlevse was one of the best working experiences I've had on Wikipedia. If only every article was written as this one was while Rlevse was around, retention would go up and articles would be more uniformly well written. Thanks Gerda.(Littleolive oil (talk) 13:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Alyson Hannigan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alyson Hannigan. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hagelin

Hello, I've added the connected contributor template to Talk:John Hagelin. Leaving this message this seems like a damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't situation. Informing you could be interpreted as a provocation, given your earlier reaction, while not informing you would seem rude. If you'd rather not be notified in the future then I'll respect that; whatever you wish. Earlier you asked: Why now? In other words, when is the best time to follow the consensus of the community on WP:COI? My answer is: How about now? Regards, Manul ~ talk 21:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]