Talk:Lierna Castle

page format problem?! --Alec Smithson (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

FAKE AND WRONG REPORTING & PERSONAL ATTACK

The author of the report for some time and with acts pesecutori sengala to direct attacks against me. The issue is easily solved. I am the author of the ancestral castle (Chateau or Castle) of Lierna. This evil is called "false alarm".

I can not carry a copyright violation of a text which came up to me and just translated. --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Alec Smithson, it is not true that you wrote that page on it.wp (if that is what you are trying to say). As you can see by looking at the Italian article history, you have never edited it. The article there was created by an IP, 95.237.141.108, and substantial content was added by Brigante mandrogno, an established user there with edits going back to 2008. You used Google to translate it and did not provide attribution, though you have been told many times that attribution is required. You did exactly the same when you created fr:Château de Lierna, so that is (by our standards at least) a copyright violation also. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

continue and prejudicial personal attacks

continue and prejudicial personal attacks are against the Wiki Rules. I wrote the text of Castle of Lierna, like i wrote Lierna history that you erase without Reason completly (a very long research). I was also the IP, 95.237.141.108 . And I wrote also next like you can see in the Crono page. Your is a violation of the Wikipedia standard and you did VANDALSIM without reason. and you still want to be right? I make you a question, but how old are you? he just tried to hit me again for your constant personal attacks against me that we know well. --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC) who knows as I had also written the whole story of Lierna ?! Also on his castle in Lierna showing the contents (I repeat that you have vandalized and deleted). How many combinations eh? and somehow you're always you who would destroy my text and wikipedia. When you have no competence. --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Alec Smithson, are you claiming to be Brigante mandrogno, who wrote most of that article? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I never said to be this user! I'm not Brigante! in any case the content that you can view on the castle are also on lierna page. They are the ones that you've deleted. I remind you that also translate a page does not involve an infringement and is prohibited. You could bring you translation and not unjustly accuse devastating the page with vandalism where those interested can no longer read. Blocking information and dissemination. Do you remember what you're doing in law you are called ATTACK TEMERARIO. you should reflect your personal problems with me vandalizing the wikipedia pages continuously. --Alec Smithson (talk) 15:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Stalking

the page was obviously devastated ... Clearly every report against me by this author for personal reasons, and continuous.

curious that the author of each message is always the same absurd is not it? --Alec Smithson (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I quite share the concerns raised here and elsewhere about these "Natoli"-related articles, which suffer from such poor use of English that it is often difficult to discern meaning accurately or, alternately, text that sounds as if lifted from other sources without adequate attribution; lack of specific, verifiable footnotes; footnotes and references which do not substantiate the text; exaggerated or fabricated allegations about the deeds, origins, honors, possessions and affiliations of the "Natoli" and their alleged kin; hyped notability; suspected conflict of interest; sock-puppetry; inadequate explanations and rationales provided in edit summaries and on talk pages. FactStraight (talk) 04:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Assessment and Task force Mil Hist

I cannot assess beyond stub, and I did place it in the Fortifications Task force. When you two stop arguing and resolve this (I suggest some kind of arbitration without shouting), I will proceed further.auntieruth (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ok checked

SwisterTwister check the page.

ok

is CHANGED THE PAGE NOW

erase the cover and show the page please. thanks --Alec Smithson (talk) 18:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

obvious abuse of office. no copyright infringement only partial translation of text wikipedia

the text was already present on Wikipedia in Italian. And as such by the law itself he was free of copyright. I will have the translated and did not know how to report it to be the subject of translation, I asked if it was legitimate administrators the translation and they said yes. The same person who has raised the issue of copyright is well to realize that it is a partial translation of the Italian text of wikipedia. And this perhaps dobrevve bring a reminder to him for false alarm and for blocking the easy use of the individual display the player for a long time. I have not riporato it was a translation because it was a free translation and partial and therefore not identical, also did not know how to insert the tag translation. And no one helped me about. But only he attacked unfairly. I also immediately entered and changed the text again this time originated entirely from me and I can prove it in various ways, and yet I was still locked when to listen to reason. --Alec Smithson (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)