User talk:Sofa King Insane: Difference between revisions
Coretheapple (talk | contribs) m →September 2015: fix |
→September 2015: dear kitty |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
Also please be cognizant of [[WP:3RR|the three revert rule]]. There is a talk-page consensus on the "writer" usage. Please discuss it at the talk page. Also, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anne_Frank&diff=prev&oldid=681097294 this edit summary] is nauseating and offensive. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 13:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC) |
Also please be cognizant of [[WP:3RR|the three revert rule]]. There is a talk-page consensus on the "writer" usage. Please discuss it at the talk page. Also, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anne_Frank&diff=prev&oldid=681097294 this edit summary] is nauseating and offensive. [[User:Coretheapple|Coretheapple]] ([[User talk:Coretheapple|talk]]) 13:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Farts sometimes have that effect. So does following people around in an attempt to annoy them. |
Revision as of 05:57, 16 September 2015
Welcome
|
Your username
Hi, I hate to be a killjoy, but I think your username will run afoul of the powers that be. You may want to consider changing it to avoid any drama. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I sofa king. Don't care.
September 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anne Frank. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 05:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Also please be cognizant of the three revert rule. There is a talk-page consensus on the "writer" usage. Please discuss it at the talk page. Also, this edit summary is nauseating and offensive. Coretheapple (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Farts sometimes have that effect. So does following people around in an attempt to annoy them.