Jump to content

Market fundamentalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
That's an angry response to an Economist book review, it's hardly neutral or professional wording on "market fundamentalism"
Rv. Politico is a reliable source and Edward E Baptist is a renowned scholar. His analysis of the issue certainly merits inclusion here, especially given the preceding sentence. Not only that, proper attribution is made and there is no undue weight given.
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Market fundamentalism''' (also known as '''free market fundamentalism''') is a pejorative term applied to a strong belief in the ability of ''[[laissez-faire]]'' or [[free market]] policies to solve most economic and social problems.<ref name=LONGVIEW1>[http://www.longviewinstitute.org/projects/marketfundamentalism/marketfundamentalism Block,Fred. ''Market Fundamentalism'', Longview Institute]</ref>
'''Market fundamentalism''' (also known as '''free market fundamentalism''') is a pejorative term applied to a strong belief in the ability of ''[[laissez-faire]]'' or [[free market]] policies to solve most economic and social problems.<ref name=LONGVIEW1>[http://www.longviewinstitute.org/projects/marketfundamentalism/marketfundamentalism Block,Fred. ''Market Fundamentalism'', Longview Institute]</ref>


Critics of laissez-faire policies have used the term to denote what they perceive as a misguided belief, or deliberate deception, that [[free market]]s provide the greatest possible equity and prosperity,<ref name=LONGVIEW>[http://www.longviewinstitute.org/projects/moral/sorcerersapprentice Block,Fred. ''Reframing the Political Battle: Market Fundamentalism vs. Moral Economy.'', Longview Institute]</ref> and that any interference with the market process decreases social well being. Users of the term include adherents of [[Economic interventionism|interventionist]], [[mixed economy]] and [[Protectionism|protectionist]] positions,<ref name=MIRACLE>[http://www.bidstrup.com/economics.htm Bidstrup, Scott. ''Free Market Fundamentalism: Friedman, Pinochet and the "Chilean Miracle"'', Revised 10/15/02]</ref> as well as billionaires such as [[George Soros]],<ref name=WARNS>[http://www.wsws.org/articles/1998/dec1998/soro-d22.shtml Beams, Nick. ''Soros warns of "market fundamentalism"''. WSWS : News & Analysis : World Economy 22 December 1998]</ref> and economists such as Nobel Laureates [[Joseph Stiglitz]]<ref name=REDIFINING>[http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/download/2001_World_Economics.pdf Stiglitz, Joseph. ''Redefining the Role of the State - What should it do ? How should it do it ? And how should these decisions be made?'' Paper presented at the Tenth Anniversary of MITI Research Institute, Tokyo, March 1998.]</ref> and [[Paul Krugman]]. George Soros suggests that market fundamentalism includes the belief that the best interests in a given society are achieved by allowing its participants to pursue their own financial self-interest with no restraint or regulatory oversight.<ref name=LONGVIEW1/><ref name=WORSTCRISIS>[[George Soros|Soros, George]], [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/24f73610-c91e-11dc-9807-000077b07658.html "The worst market crisis in 60 years.]" ''[[Financial Times]]'', January 22, 2008 19:57</ref> Critics claim that in modern society with world-wide conglomerates, or even merely large companies, the individual has no protection against fraud nor harm caused by products that maximize income by imposing externalities on the individual consumer as well as society.
Critics of laissez-faire policies have used the term to denote what they perceive as a misguided belief, or deliberate deception, that [[free market]]s provide the greatest possible equity and prosperity,<ref name=LONGVIEW>[http://www.longviewinstitute.org/projects/moral/sorcerersapprentice Block,Fred. ''Reframing the Political Battle: Market Fundamentalism vs. Moral Economy.'', Longview Institute]</ref> and that any interference with the market process decreases social well being. Users of the term include adherents of [[Economic interventionism|interventionist]], [[mixed economy]] and [[Protectionism|protectionist]] positions,<ref name=MIRACLE>[http://www.bidstrup.com/economics.htm Bidstrup, Scott. ''Free Market Fundamentalism: Friedman, Pinochet and the "Chilean Miracle"'', Revised 10/15/02]</ref> as well as billionaires such as [[George Soros]],<ref name=WARNS>[http://www.wsws.org/articles/1998/dec1998/soro-d22.shtml Beams, Nick. ''Soros warns of "market fundamentalism"''. WSWS : News & Analysis : World Economy 22 December 1998]</ref> and economists such as Nobel Laureates [[Joseph Stiglitz]]<ref name=REDIFINING>[http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/download/2001_World_Economics.pdf Stiglitz, Joseph. ''Redefining the Role of the State - What should it do ? How should it do it ? And how should these decisions be made?'' Paper presented at the Tenth Anniversary of MITI Research Institute, Tokyo, March 1998.]</ref> and [[Paul Krugman]]. George Soros suggests that market fundamentalism includes the belief that the best interests in a given society are achieved by allowing its participants to pursue their own financial self-interest with no restraint or regulatory oversight.<ref name=LONGVIEW1/><ref name=WORSTCRISIS>[[George Soros|Soros, George]], [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/24f73610-c91e-11dc-9807-000077b07658.html "The worst market crisis in 60 years.]" ''[[Financial Times]]'', January 22, 2008 19:57</ref> Critics claim that in modern society with world-wide conglomerates, or even merely large companies, the individual has no protection against fraud nor harm caused by products that maximize income by imposing externalities on the individual consumer as well as society. Historian [[Edward E. Baptist]] contends "unrestrained domination of market forces can sometimes amplify existing forms of oppression into something more horrific," such as [[slavery]], and that "market fundamentalism doesn’t always provide the best solution for every economic or social problem."<ref>Edward Baptist (September 7, 2014). [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/economist-review-slavery-110687.html#.VWB1Kk9Viko What the ''Economist'' Doesn't Get About Slavery—And My Book]. ''[[Politico]].'' Retrieved May 23, 2015.</ref>


According to economist [[John Quiggin]], the standard features of economic fundamentalist rhetoric are [[dogma|dogmatic]] assertions combined with the claim that anyone who holds contrary views is not a real economist.<ref name=DOGMA>[[John Quiggin|Quiggin, John]]. ''Rationalism and Rationality in Economics'', 1999, On Line Opinion,www.onlineopinion.com.au</ref> This approach follows from evidence that [[neoclassical economics]] provides a scientific explanation of economic phenomena, an explanation that economists state represents the status of scientific truth (if, and only if, all of the [[Economics#Criticism of assumptions|assumptions]] involved in deriving the economic analysis are simultaneously satisfied). However, Kozul-Wright states in his book ''The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism'' that "ineluctability of market forces" [[Neoliberalism|neo-liberal]]s and conservative politicians tend to stress, and their confidence on a chosen policy, rest on a "mixture of implicit and hidden [[Economics#Criticism of assumptions|assumptions]], myths about the history of their own countries' economic development, and special interests camouflaged in their rhetoric of general good".<ref name=RESISTIBLE>KOZUL-WRIGHT, Richard and RAYMENT, Paul. ''The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism: Rethinking Development Policy in an Unbalanced World''. London: Zed Books Ltd, 2007 p. 14 and Chapter 6</ref>
According to economist [[John Quiggin]], the standard features of economic fundamentalist rhetoric are [[dogma|dogmatic]] assertions combined with the claim that anyone who holds contrary views is not a real economist.<ref name=DOGMA>[[John Quiggin|Quiggin, John]]. ''Rationalism and Rationality in Economics'', 1999, On Line Opinion,www.onlineopinion.com.au</ref> This approach follows from evidence that [[neoclassical economics]] provides a scientific explanation of economic phenomena, an explanation that economists state represents the status of scientific truth (if, and only if, all of the [[Economics#Criticism of assumptions|assumptions]] involved in deriving the economic analysis are simultaneously satisfied). However, Kozul-Wright states in his book ''The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism'' that "ineluctability of market forces" [[Neoliberalism|neo-liberal]]s and conservative politicians tend to stress, and their confidence on a chosen policy, rest on a "mixture of implicit and hidden [[Economics#Criticism of assumptions|assumptions]], myths about the history of their own countries' economic development, and special interests camouflaged in their rhetoric of general good".<ref name=RESISTIBLE>KOZUL-WRIGHT, Richard and RAYMENT, Paul. ''The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism: Rethinking Development Policy in an Unbalanced World''. London: Zed Books Ltd, 2007 p. 14 and Chapter 6</ref>

Revision as of 03:27, 19 June 2015

Market fundamentalism (also known as free market fundamentalism) is a pejorative term applied to a strong belief in the ability of laissez-faire or free market policies to solve most economic and social problems.[1]

Critics of laissez-faire policies have used the term to denote what they perceive as a misguided belief, or deliberate deception, that free markets provide the greatest possible equity and prosperity,[2] and that any interference with the market process decreases social well being. Users of the term include adherents of interventionist, mixed economy and protectionist positions,[3] as well as billionaires such as George Soros,[4] and economists such as Nobel Laureates Joseph Stiglitz[5] and Paul Krugman. George Soros suggests that market fundamentalism includes the belief that the best interests in a given society are achieved by allowing its participants to pursue their own financial self-interest with no restraint or regulatory oversight.[1][6] Critics claim that in modern society with world-wide conglomerates, or even merely large companies, the individual has no protection against fraud nor harm caused by products that maximize income by imposing externalities on the individual consumer as well as society. Historian Edward E. Baptist contends "unrestrained domination of market forces can sometimes amplify existing forms of oppression into something more horrific," such as slavery, and that "market fundamentalism doesn’t always provide the best solution for every economic or social problem."[7]

According to economist John Quiggin, the standard features of economic fundamentalist rhetoric are dogmatic assertions combined with the claim that anyone who holds contrary views is not a real economist.[8] This approach follows from evidence that neoclassical economics provides a scientific explanation of economic phenomena, an explanation that economists state represents the status of scientific truth (if, and only if, all of the assumptions involved in deriving the economic analysis are simultaneously satisfied). However, Kozul-Wright states in his book The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism that "ineluctability of market forces" neo-liberals and conservative politicians tend to stress, and their confidence on a chosen policy, rest on a "mixture of implicit and hidden assumptions, myths about the history of their own countries' economic development, and special interests camouflaged in their rhetoric of general good".[9]

History of the term

The expression "market fundamentalism" was popularized by business magnate and philanthropist George Soros in his book The Crisis of Global Capitalism (1998),[10] in which he writes "This idea was called laissez faire in the nineteenth century... I have found a better name for it: market fundamentalism.".[11] P. Sainath believes Jeremy Seabrook, a journalist and campaigner, first used the term.[12] The term was used by John Langmore and John Quiggin in their 1994 book Work for All.[13] A full description of the origins of the free market economics dating as far back to the conception of natural laws as mathematical, eternal and absolute—a reflection of some perfect mathematical form—derived from ancient Greek philosophers Pythagoras (569–500 BC) and Plato, and reinvigorated by the Enlightenment is well beyond the scope of this article, but can be read on Chapter 4, A Brief Account of the Historical Origins of Economic Fundamentalism, in Dr. Lee Boldman's book (2007).[14]

The expression is now used by various authors writing on economic topics to signify an allegedly unjustified belief in the ability of markets to solve all problems in a society.[15] The term has been used, pejoratively, to criticize some groups which are mainly viewed as advocating strongly against "any" state regulation and defend a "totally" free market.[15] It is also used to disparage the arguments of the proponents of "the virtues of radical free-market economics" or, in Soros' own words, against the "ideology" which "has put financial capital into the driver's seat."[11]

Joseph E. Stiglitz used the term in his autobiographical essay in acceptance of Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences to criticize some International Monetary Fund policies: "More broadly, the IMF was advocating a set of policies which is generally referred to alternatively as the Washington consensus, the neo-liberal doctrines, or market fundamentalism, based on an incorrect understanding of economic theory and (what I viewed) as an inadequate interpretation of the historical data." [16]

The theories that I (and others) helped develop explained why unfettered markets often not only do not lead to social justice, but do not even produce efficient outcomes. Interestingly, there has been no intellectual challenge to the refutation of Adam Smith’s invisible hand: individuals and firms, in the pursuit of their self-interest, are not necessarily, or in general, led as if by an invisible hand, to economic efficiency.[17]

The sociologists Fred L. Block and Margaret Somers use the label "because the term conveys the quasi-religious certainty expressed by contemporary advocates of market self-regulation."[18]

See also

3

References

  1. ^ a b Block,Fred. Market Fundamentalism, Longview Institute
  2. ^ Block,Fred. Reframing the Political Battle: Market Fundamentalism vs. Moral Economy., Longview Institute
  3. ^ Bidstrup, Scott. Free Market Fundamentalism: Friedman, Pinochet and the "Chilean Miracle", Revised 10/15/02
  4. ^ Beams, Nick. Soros warns of "market fundamentalism". WSWS : News & Analysis : World Economy 22 December 1998
  5. ^ Stiglitz, Joseph. Redefining the Role of the State - What should it do ? How should it do it ? And how should these decisions be made? Paper presented at the Tenth Anniversary of MITI Research Institute, Tokyo, March 1998.
  6. ^ Soros, George, "The worst market crisis in 60 years." Financial Times, January 22, 2008 19:57
  7. ^ Edward Baptist (September 7, 2014). What the Economist Doesn't Get About Slavery—And My Book. Politico. Retrieved May 23, 2015.
  8. ^ Quiggin, John. Rationalism and Rationality in Economics, 1999, On Line Opinion,www.onlineopinion.com.au
  9. ^ KOZUL-WRIGHT, Richard and RAYMENT, Paul. The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism: Rethinking Development Policy in an Unbalanced World. London: Zed Books Ltd, 2007 p. 14 and Chapter 6
  10. ^ BRESLOW,Marc. George Soros: Beware Market Fundamentalism. Dollars & Sense, issue #221, January-February 1999
  11. ^ a b SOROS, George. The Crisis of Global Capitalism Public Affairs, 1998.
  12. ^ SAINATH,P. And then there was the market.
  13. ^ Quiggin, John. "WORK FOR ALL - REPLY". Retrieved 30 January 2012.
  14. ^ Boldeman, Dr. Lee. Template:PDF. 2007, Canberra: The Australian National University ANU E Press. ISBN 978-1-921313-53-0, p. 13
  15. ^ a b Market fundamentalism The Language of Philosophy - Dictionary and Research Guide, Enlexica, Inc.
  16. ^ Autobiographical essay in acceptance of the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel
  17. ^ STIGLITZ, Joseph E. The pact with the devil. Beppe Grillo's Friends interview
  18. ^ Fred Block and Margaret R. Somers. The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique. Harvard University Press, 2014. ISBN 0674050711. p. 3.

Bibliography

  • Albers, Detlev, Haeler, Stephen, Meyer, Henning; (Editors) (23 June 2006). Social Europe: A Continent's Answer to Market Fundamentalism. London: European Research Forum at London Metropolitan University. ISBN 0-9547448-3-7. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Camerer, C. (1995): Individual Decision Making, in: Kagel, J.H. & Roth, A.E. (Eds.): Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 587-703. ISBN 978-0-691-05897-9
  • French-Davis, Ricardo. Reforming Latin America's Economies: After Market Fundamentalism. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. ISBN 1-4039-4945-X ISBN 978-1403949455
  • Kelsey, Jane (1995). A Review of Economic Fundamentalism: The New Zealand Experiment - A World Model for Structural Adjustment?. Pluto Press. ISBN 1-86940-130-1
  • Kozul-Wright, Richard. The Resistible Rise of Market Fundamentalism: The Struggle for Economic Development in a Global Economy. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), London: ZedBooks Ltd, 2007. ISBN 978-1-84277-636-0 ISBN 9781842776377
  • Ritzer, George (editor) (2003). The Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists. Blackwell Companions to Sociology. Blackwell publishing. ISBN 0-631-20710-4. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  • Soros, George (1998). The Crisis of Global Capitalism: The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-891620-27-0
  • Soros, George (2008). The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What It Means. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-58648-683-9.
  • Sunder, S (1995). "Experimental Asset Markets: A Survey". In Kagel, J.H. & Roth, A.E. (eds) (ed.). Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 445–500. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) ISBN 978-0-691-05897-9