User talk:Major Torp: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:58, 17 December 2014

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Droit du seigneur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

interpretation by Jörg Wettlaufer - Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol 21, Nr. 2 (2000): 111-123 [[http://www.fibri.de/jus/arthbes.htm]).</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets blocked

Major Torp, I am blocking your sockpuppets, except for Koldewe, since you declared that one. When I saw you pushing an anti-gay agenda on Tchaikovsky I knew Septimus Wilkinson would become active on Rimsky-Korsakov and I didn't have to wait long. Please read our policy on sockpuppetry and observe it. Thank you. (And yes I know there are more, some that you haven't used for years.) Antandrus (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have started a new alternative account User:No Source - No Valid Source, even though you already have the User:Koldewe alternative account. Why do you need two alternative accounts? Do you have others?-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring...

Major, I can see that you feel strongly about the issue, but the behaviour at Edward II of England is coming to look like Wikipedia:Edit warring. I'd strongly advise you to gain consensus on the talk page, rather than repeating the same edit multiple times, even if over several months. Hchc2009 (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andreas Vesalius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting information whose citation is a dead link

Please could you read Wikipedia:Link rot.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Sockpuppets blocked==
 Major Torp, I am blocking your sockpuppets, except for Koldewe, since you declared that one.  When I saw you pushing an anti-gay agenda on Tchaikovsky I knew Septimus Wilkinson would become active on Rimsky-Korsakov and I didn't have to wait long.  Please read our policy on [[WP:SOCKPUPPET|sockpuppetry]] and observe it.  Thank you. (And yes I know there are more, some that you haven't used for years.) [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 13:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
+:I see that you have started a new alternative account [[User:No Source - No Valid Source]], even though you already have the [[User:Koldewe]] alternative account. Why do you need two alternative accounts?  Do you have others?--<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 07:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 == Edit warring... ==