Jump to content

User talk:HaleakalAri: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)
Line 62: Line 62:


You decided not to self-revert or explain why on the talk page ? Could you explain why ? I need to decide what to do about it and input from you will help. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 14:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
You decided not to self-revert or explain why on the talk page ? Could you explain why ? I need to decide what to do about it and input from you will help. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 14:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

You just broke the 1RR restriction on this article, self revert please. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 00:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:52, 19 November 2013

Welcome!

Hello, HaleakalAri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --AW 16:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cogosx7.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Ubikwit

Evildoer187 (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "List of indigenous peoples Talk page".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 20:48, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mondoweiss

You should self revert this edit. There is no secondary source coverage and there is no consensus to include it. It should stay out of the article until there is a policy based reasons and agreement to include it. Also, read WP:MINOR. Please confirm that you will self-revert or explain why not on the article talk page. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is 1RR under WP:ARBPIA as announced on talk page. You also have made more than one revert in 24 hours with the Lowicki info. Also the new personal blog entry. It's a clear WP:RS/WP:BLP violation as agreed by a couple editors who came over from WP:BLPN. Please revert the change so I don't have to take you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring per below template. (Also note the Times of Israel blog info may be ok IF you detail what it says.) I'll look now.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. CarolMooreDC 18:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You decided not to self-revert or explain why on the talk page ? Could you explain why ? I need to decide what to do about it and input from you will help. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You just broke the 1RR restriction on this article, self revert please. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]