User talk:Encyclotadd

Hello Encyclotadd. Your edit [1] constitutes vandalism. If you wish to discuss, do so on the relevant discussion page, and/or my talk page. Please refer to WP:NPOV and WP:BRD Lam Kin Keung (talk) 08:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your edit isn't vandalism. But, it is contested and is likely WP:OR. Please discuss it on the talk page, as advised William M. Connolley (talk) 11:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing this and providing feedback. I'm new to the wikipedia community so doing my best to contribute helpfully.

Thanks for your feedback guys.

I think LKK was referring to a note that I put into the article addressed to her, and that she was right to call me out for it. I'm new to the Wikipedia community and would only like to contribute in the most helpful ways, so I appreciate her feedback and also yours.

For the text that I'm hoping will be accepted by everyone, I gave three highly credible references directly in the article using the format required for those references by Wikipedia. Additionally, I provided even more substantiation in the discussion section including to work done by mainstream news sources.

I'm highly confident members of the wikipedia community will only become more impressed with the facts added as they look into them and encourage everyone to do so. A lot of interesting work is being done in the neuroscience community about plasticity.

Snowded and Lam Kin Keung / HeadleyDown Meat/Sockpuppetting

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/HeadleyDown

http://sites.google.com/site/sockmasterouting/ [[2]]

A detailed run-down of HeadleyDown and his meat/sockpuppets is here: https://sites.google.com/site/exposingsocks/ [[3]]

http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed.html [[4]]

http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed-2.html [[5]]

Note the comment: by James Donnelly

I am a skeptic myself like some other NLPers. However, the NLP article is far from balanced. It looks like a blatant attack on NLP. The website you linked is quite clear on one thing: Pro NLPers have never been banned. That should tell you something: Wikipedians other than youself realize your editing is highly biased. Of course they allow others in to balance the picture.Good luck with promoting your side and routing your foes. I think it will backfire badly though. You and your pseudoskeptic friends will just end up getting banned again. CheersJamesD

Here's what happened the last time: [[6]]

And last but not least, the Wikipedia ban on HeadleyDown+sock/meatpuppets and any reincarnation of him, based upon BEHAVIOR.