Jump to content

User talk:Abhirup2441139: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 93: Line 93:
::{{non admin comment}} @[[User:Abhirup2441139|Abhirup2441139]] I would advise you to be careful with your baseless accusations of discrimination etc. Your drafts were copyright violations, and/or largely promotional, and/or offered no evidence of notability. They were declined and subsequently deleted for these reasons; there was no discrimination involved in any of this. In addition, you have a likely COI issue, which you have only alluded to and not actually disclosed as required, and you were operating multiple accounts against Wikipedia's terms and condition of use. Please do not try to play the victim here. Thank you. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{non admin comment}} @[[User:Abhirup2441139|Abhirup2441139]] I would advise you to be careful with your baseless accusations of discrimination etc. Your drafts were copyright violations, and/or largely promotional, and/or offered no evidence of notability. They were declined and subsequently deleted for these reasons; there was no discrimination involved in any of this. In addition, you have a likely COI issue, which you have only alluded to and not actually disclosed as required, and you were operating multiple accounts against Wikipedia's terms and condition of use. Please do not try to play the victim here. Thank you. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
::PS: If you wish to actually appeal your block, you need to do it correctly, as instructed in the block notice. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
::PS: If you wish to actually appeal your block, you need to do it correctly, as instructed in the block notice. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
:::thanks for your concern will take up the matter with appropriate authorities, thanks [[User:Abhirup2441139|Abhirup2441139]] ([[User talk:Abhirup2441139#top|talk]]) 16:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:01, 18 April 2024

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arup Das (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Abhirup2441139! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Abhirup2441139 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Abhirup2441139. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Arup Das, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

he person for whom such page is created has been a vital fame in the 1980's-1990's of Indian Football and has been a integral part of the football fraternity for over three decades.

If it is the deletion of your user page that you are contesting, then please note that this sort of content is not allowed on user pages, per WP:UP. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
contesting the article submission Abhirup2441139 (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That makes no sense – you're contesting the fact that you submitted an article draft? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are having some misunderstanding Abhirup2441139 (talk) 10:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arup K Das (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Arup K Das requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sportskeeda.com/indian-football/my-father-the-footballer. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your account was only created yesterday, and since then you have created five different copies of the Arup Das draft, most of them with significant copyright violations. You also have not responded to the conflict-of-interest (COI) query, which I posted here earlier (please do so as your next edit). If you create more copies of this draft, or otherwise continue your tendentious editing, I will be reporting you and you this may result in sanctions. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sir, could you please hear my part of the story, I have not been given even the chance to speak my part sir, I am a completely new editor here and I had no idea of the rules of not having two accounts but I have not been guided and have been constantly discriminated by the reviewer and the article I wrote sir is of an inspirational character in India who has been unnoticed in recent internet times due to very less availability of details in the net and that is the reason for publishing such article. Thinking that maybe a different reviewer would check the article and announce an unbiased opinion i crated the other account and published the same Abhirup2441139 (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia cannot be used for that purpose. If he has been "unnoticed" then we cannot have an article on him, full stop. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) @Abhirup2441139 I would advise you to be careful with your baseless accusations of discrimination etc. Your drafts were copyright violations, and/or largely promotional, and/or offered no evidence of notability. They were declined and subsequently deleted for these reasons; there was no discrimination involved in any of this. In addition, you have a likely COI issue, which you have only alluded to and not actually disclosed as required, and you were operating multiple accounts against Wikipedia's terms and condition of use. Please do not try to play the victim here. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS: If you wish to actually appeal your block, you need to do it correctly, as instructed in the block notice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for your concern will take up the matter with appropriate authorities, thanks Abhirup2441139 (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]