User talk:Nishkid64: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASushruta&diff=238025223&oldid=238022136 Just one question]. [[User:JSR|JSR]] ([[User talk:JSR|talk]]) 22:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC) |
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASushruta&diff=238025223&oldid=238022136 Just one question]. [[User:JSR|JSR]] ([[User talk:JSR|talk]]) 22:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
What a prick, don't act mature when you have neither the guts nor inteligent to speak up. [[User:Anpersonalaccount|Anpersonalaccount]] ([[User talk:Anpersonalaccount|talk]]) 22:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[1964 Gabon coup d'état]] == |
== [[1964 Gabon coup d'état]] == |
Revision as of 22:32, 12 September 2008
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #262 |
RfA thank you
— JGHowes talk - 19 August 2008
Hydrochloric acid FAR: your further comments please
Hello Nishkid64, you request a FAR for Hydrochloric acid. With a joint effort of WP:Chem and other editors, significant progress has been achieved. Would you please comment in Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hydrochloric acid, and adjust your 'remove' recommendation accordingly? Wim van Dorst (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC).
Hello !
How are you going mate ? Please, could you take a look at thoose few changes i made : [1]
Thanks :) Lilyu (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Lilyu (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good job, good job.... ha. I had all my cleaning work on the french article revert by the guy who wrote the biography of the woman. And 4 fanboys has gang bang me cause i was sayin he's not neutral with the subject and talking shit on other historians that do not agree with him. So, i had to left the article. i flee :(
- (sorry for the bad slang, most of my english vocabulary come from Hollywood movies, i dont know how to say it in a normal way) Lilyu (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
PaxEquilibrium has asked me to ask you to check your e-mail. Thanks! —Nightstallion 13:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
Dear Nish, it appears to me that an editor that goes by the name of WikiEditorMagic has a single point agenda of reverting my edits. I request you to look in to the matter.--OoOpS (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 35 | 25 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 36 | 8 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've left some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1964 Gabon coup d'état. If you have time, I wonder if you would revisit it? Thanks, Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 00:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Do you have any (English, I can barely read French) sources beside the Powder Keg? Man, this has been one stressful FAC. I wonder what FHB's would be like if we indeed make the final push. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 21:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- What are we to do with Tsanirina, M'ba, and HB if we can't translate an article from other Wikipedias without accessing its sources first? If that is the case, I no longer wish to contribute. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 22:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- I can barely read French, so that would be extremely hard. There aren't enough English sources to replace the amount of info from French ones. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 23:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- What are we to do with Tsanirina, M'ba, and HB if we can't translate an article from other Wikipedias without accessing its sources first? If that is the case, I no longer wish to contribute. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 22:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom clerk template
I've created a template shortening the work for you, it is the same thing as used on your userpage, converted to template form. Cheers. —Sunday Scribe 00:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
New account attacking articles
An interesting situations seems to be developing in Sushruta and the Sushruta Samhita where one new editor seems bound to make a statement attributing the origin of all of India's literature to Ashoka. Most of it may have to do with a discussion here and here and a series of edits made on Leprosy which can be found here. He himself undid his edits on leprosy after I removed the off topic material but now he seems to do the 'attribution of the origin of India's literature to Ashoka' in Sushruta and the Sushruta Samhita for some reason.
I want to ask what can I do to defuse the situation? I'm pretty sure that this editor will not listen to reason or be civil (some of it may have to do with his being less experienced) but I can't let anyone attack an article for whatever level of experience one has. I myself spent days on wp: sandbox to attain minimum understanding of Wikipedia. I'm writing this to you because you have dealt with him once before for his edit warring where he made claims which he clearly did not intend to follow.
JSR (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Just asking for an opinion: Would a fully sourced rewrite of these two articles using proper sources take care of the present situation so no outside intervention is necessary? The editor is new after all, and bound to make a few mistakes initially. Should I try and attempt a sourced rewrite (the article can benefit from some improvement) first and see if the pattern persists ? JSR (talk) 15:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I have made an effort and written the article using the earliest reliable sources at hand. Kindly see that his incivility and revert warring stops. I have just been left a disturbing message on my talk page. JSR (talk) 20:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- He just reverted and said: Doesn't matter, it doesn't change a thing, I provide another scholar source. It doesn't matter that he has not read the source (or has it)? His source doesn't deal with medicine and does not have any component of India's medicine in it. And what are his comments on Indian literature doing on a surgery page? Please look at his latest reverts after warnings. I have not reverted thrice but rewrote the whole thing sourcing it and removing all material which was nsourced and/or unrelated to medicine. Literary critique belongs in the literature of India, not as a sweeping generalization in surgery. The material was originally introduced by another editor on Leprosy and has been removed from there following discussion. He neither has it nor is he familiar with it and the article itself is not seen on surgery related pages elsewhere as it deals with literature.JSR (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Query
Nishkid64, I apologize for again imposing on you for OTRS "stuff", but I'm wondering whether you could tell me what ticket 2007110910016335 says. I ask because this image of a Federal Reserve Note was replaced with one containing "specimen" stamping and a summary referring to that ticket as the reason. I'm curious whether the "specimen" stamp is indeed a requirement to display/reproduce such currency; I can't find such a requirement in US statutes or government websites, so I'm wondering whether the ticket articulates something I've missed. Эlcobbola talk 19:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Эlcobbola talk 21:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
JSR's edits
JSR's edit was to removing the sourced information, thus a vadalism, I don't see how a complete re-written would make a different, different scholar's opiinons are to be included anyway. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
You can believe JSR for all you like, that's your personal bais towards him. See the article talk page for my reply. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- As for: Doesn't matter, it doesn't change a thing, I provide another scholar source: He's simply lying. He has reverted thrice to the exact same content the he has been pushing all along. No new sources, scholars or text. He neither has the source, nor has he read it, and neither does his source deal in any manner with surgery—on which he likes to edit and push POV. Childish cries of 'believing' and 'bias' are disruptive for those who have warned him before and have even thanked him for taking it easy once and are his way of defending things but vandalism remains vandalism. Saying "Doesn't matter, it doesn't change a thing, I provide another scholar source" after previous promises of refraining from vandalism ("I did not meant it, please forgive me once!") mean that the ditor is used to it. JSR (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
What a prick, don't act mature when you have neither the guts nor inteligent to speak up. Anpersonalaccount (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Nish, keep me posted on the FAC in terms of how you want to proceed; I know you're trying to get your hands on some additional sources. Of course, it would be better if the French editor would come on board to help, but he too seems to have misunderstand WP:V policy and comments about reliability of Wiki as a source. We need to overcome 1) translation concerns, 2) sourcing concerns (including some English language issues that surfaced) and 3) comprehensive concerns. If you think you can do that, I'll continue to leave it open. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)