User talk:FlippyFlink: Difference between revisions
David Gerard (talk | contribs) →Cardano page: new section |
→General sanctions alert: new section |
||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
Since it was literally just deleted in the AFD, I've moved it to [[Draft:Cardano (platform)]] so someone doesn't speedy-delete it as a recreation of a just-deleted page. This way you can develop it to a stage where it has enough good refs to survive :-) - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 21:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC) |
Since it was literally just deleted in the AFD, I've moved it to [[Draft:Cardano (platform)]] so someone doesn't speedy-delete it as a recreation of a just-deleted page. This way you can develop it to a stage where it has enough good refs to survive :-) - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 21:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
== General sanctions alert == |
|||
{{Ivm|2='''''Please read this notification carefully,''' it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
A [[Special:PermaLink/842448517#General_sanctions_proposal|community decision]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[blockchain]] and [[cryptocurrency|cryptocurrencies]]. The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Blockchain_and_cryptocurrencies|here]]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a '''one [[Help:Reverting|revert]] per twenty-four hours [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|restriction]]''', as described [[Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Blockchain_and_cryptocurrencies#1RR|here]]. |
|||
[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Blockchain_and_cryptocurrencies#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. }} [[User:Retimuko|Retimuko]] ([[User talk:Retimuko|talk]]) 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:27, 29 November 2018
Thanks for the boneless update
Your updated list is better than what I had, showing more than just post count.
However, could you adjust it to be as narrow as possible, with a smaller font in the heading? Wikimedia is biased against image width so the extra whitespace between columns makes the overall image smaller and harder to read when auto-resized by the Wikimedia software.
Although the data could technically be rendered as a textual wikitable in the article, I tend to lean in favor of the image format for this, because it is hard to vandalize an image but trivially easy to vandalize a table, and to do subtle vandalism changes that most editors would miss. Also, due to the dynamic nature of usenet, the image serves as a fixed snapshot or record, of statistical data that is constantly in flux.
DMahalko (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
What did you think about the deletion notice you received?
Hi FlippyFlink,
In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:
- Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
- If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
- What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?
You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
7zip + MultiPar
Hi, I noticed that you added info to the Parchive article about a pending feature request to add recovery data to 7zip. This is already possible using MultiPar and a supplementary batch script. See: Parchive#cite_note-15. Could you update your 7zip feature request at sourceforge to mention that? It might make it easier for the 7zip devs to add the feature if they can cooperate with the author of MultiPar and use his code within 7zip. Badon (talk) 19:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Wildcard certificates
note: wild card characters in the subject aren't allowed according to rfc5280, openldap for instance matches certificate's subject following rfc5280. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.93.81.142 (talk) 08:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
January 2016
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article AC power plugs and sockets. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. ZH8000 (talk) 07:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Active Directory Services for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Active Directory Services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active Directory Services until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, FlippyFlink. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crypto-shredding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hashing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
The article PIVX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article was deleted 2 months ago for failing to satisfy WP:GNG (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIVX). Recreated article still doesn't cite sufficiently good sources to establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- intgr [talk] 15:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of PIVX
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on PIVX, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EPrivacy Regulation (European Union), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proposal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, FlippyFlink. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve EPrivacy Regulation (European Union)
Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. FlippyFlink, thanks for creating EPrivacy Regulation (European Union)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article would be better placed in WikiSource rather than Wikipedia.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, FlippyFlink. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Cardano page
Since it was literally just deleted in the AFD, I've moved it to Draft:Cardano (platform) so someone doesn't speedy-delete it as a recreation of a just-deleted page. This way you can develop it to a stage where it has enough good refs to survive :-) - David Gerard (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
General sanctions alert
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.