User talk:QuanticNut: Difference between revisions
→July 2018: lvl 2 |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
My passion comes from having met the dev team online and being part of the community. You just seem to be territorial about 'your' wikipedia page. [[User:QuanticNut|QuanticNut]] ([[User talk:QuanticNut#top|talk]]) 06:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
My passion comes from having met the dev team online and being part of the community. You just seem to be territorial about 'your' wikipedia page. [[User:QuanticNut|QuanticNut]] ([[User talk:QuanticNut#top|talk]]) 06:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
:I was the original editor who added Williams, but when [[User:Wrath X]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detroit:_Become_Human&diff=842765729&oldid=842759451 reverted] this based on the opening credits, it made all the sense in the world. The syntax guide allows only lead writers (or credits synonymous with "lead writer", since in Japanese video games they are credited as "scenario" writers). The opening credits state: "Written and directed by David Cage". You are adding information that Wrath X, Sebastian James and I oppose, and thus have no consensus in your favour. [[User:Cognissonance|Cognissonance]] ([[User talk:Cognissonance|talk]]) 07:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:03, 21 July 2018
Detroit: Become Human
Please do not create a content dispute on this article right now. It is nominated for WP:GOODARTICLE status and cannot afford an WP:EDITWAR. If you feel so strongly about it, save it for later. Thanks. Cognissonance (talk) 06:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a platform for winning awards it's an information tool. I'm active on the Detroit Reddit and have dealt with many people from inside the studio including David cage and Williams. He's credited as a writer in the opening credits.
I agree there shouldn't be an edit war. So let's leave the correct information in place and stop vandalizing the article... QuanticNut (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is also a place of rules, which state that only lead writers should be listed. Adam Williams has officially been listed as having done "additional writing", which is not a synonym for "lead writer". Stop adding incorrect information. Cognissonance (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm genuinely concerned about your behavior now. The link you sent me doesn't say anything about only listing lead writers. It contains two IF conditions which are not met in this case:
If a single person is credited as "scenario director" or "scenario writer", list that person; synonyms for this position include "lead writer"; If there is a person credited as "scenario concept writer" or "[original] concept", also list that person here;
Nobody is listed as either. Two people ARE listed as writers though: the two whose names should be in that box. Think through what you're saying. If it had to be a lead writer, David Cage wouldn't be credited either. The credits list no lead writer.
I truly don't get why you are so committed to this, especially when the case is so clear. 'Writers' box? Put the writers in it, no more than 3!
My passion comes from having met the dev team online and being part of the community. You just seem to be territorial about 'your' wikipedia page. QuanticNut (talk) 06:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I was the original editor who added Williams, but when User:Wrath X reverted this based on the opening credits, it made all the sense in the world. The syntax guide allows only lead writers (or credits synonymous with "lead writer", since in Japanese video games they are credited as "scenario" writers). The opening credits state: "Written and directed by David Cage". You are adding information that Wrath X, Sebastian James and I oppose, and thus have no consensus in your favour. Cognissonance (talk) 07:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Cognissonance (talk) 00:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Detroit: Become Human, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cognissonance (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm familiar and dispute the reversion. The argument is over whether writers of a videogame should be listed in the writers field or... according to this user... not unless he feels like it? Guidelines are clear. QuanticNut (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Detroit: Become Human. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cognissonance (talk) 06:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)