Jump to content

User talk:Hairwizard91: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hairwizard91 (talk | contribs)
archive
Endroit (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:


끄럼 좋은 하루 되세요! ^O^ -- [[User:General Tiger|General Tiger]]
끄럼 좋은 하루 되세요! ^O^ -- [[User:General Tiger|General Tiger]]

== [[Goguryeo]] ==

As you can see in the discussions, many believe that Goguryeo is at least partially Chinese or Manchurian. Please do not declare that "Goguryeo is Korean" in the [[Goguryeo]] article, or add the word "Korean" in there unless you have clear consensus.

{{3RR}}--[[User:Endroit|Endroit]] 16:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:33, 28 October 2006

Archive
Archive1

님의 글을 읽고

다음부터 님의 이름을 끝에 적어주세요. ^^ 님 이름

아, 그리고 그냥 영어로 쓰시는 것이 저한테 편할 듯..... 초등학교를 미국에서 나왔다 보니, 쓰기는 영어가 더 편해서.

끄럼 좋은 하루 되세요! ^O^ -- General Tiger

As you can see in the discussions, many believe that Goguryeo is at least partially Chinese or Manchurian. Please do not declare that "Goguryeo is Korean" in the Goguryeo article, or add the word "Korean" in there unless you have clear consensus.

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Endroit 16:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]