Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kumioko: Difference between revisions
Joseph2302 (talk | contribs) |
declining CU, comments |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=====<big>07 May 2015</big>===== |
=====<big>07 May 2015</big>===== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|cudecline}} |
||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
;Suspected sockpuppets |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
*{{declined}} as CheckUser is next to useless when it comes to Kumioko. —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 12:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 12:43, 7 May 2015
Kumioko
- Kumioko (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
6 May 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Giraffasaurus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Hmmmm.... a new editor: (a) was already commenting (after being here a week) on the vast amount of "abuse" all arbs and admins impose on everyone [1] (b) has been slapping Wikiproject US tags on every conceivable talk page [2], and (c) created his account [3] 2-3 days after Kumioko's last attempt to get an unblock failed [4]. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Thank you very much Floquenbeam for not providing me a link to this insinuation. If you feel like blocking me for adding project tags, creating articles and doing positive edits please do so. I can just create another account later if I want to edit, its really not that big of a deal. But for a project that claims to want more editors you are trying pretty hard to make sure they can't get done. Giraffasaurus (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked indef as a Kumioko sock, per admission above. I don't know what best practice is for sock tagging, all I did was leave a block message on their talk page. I'll defer to an SPI clerk for tags, if any. Not sure if a CU wants to look again for sleepers; I understand that might be a timesink. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
07 May 2015
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- HanselnGretel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Readding CSD on categories that were initially added by User:Giraffasaurus (a sock of Kumioko), see [5], [6], [7]- seems like a duck to me. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Declined as CheckUser is next to useless when it comes to Kumioko. —DoRD (talk) 12:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
