Jump to content

User talk:Amrit Ghimire Ranjit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 218: Line 218:
== November 2014 ==
== November 2014 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Template:History of South Asia]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. &nbsp;[[User:Philg88|<span style="color:#3a23e2; font-weight:bold; text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em;">&nbsp;Philg88&nbsp;</span>]]<sup>♦[[User_talk:Philg88|talk]]</sup> 12:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Template:History of South Asia]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. &nbsp;[[User:Philg88|<span style="color:#3a23e2; font-weight:bold; text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em;">&nbsp;Philg88&nbsp;</span>]]<sup>♦[[User_talk:Philg88|talk]]</sup> 12:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
::{{replyto|Philg88}} Thanks!!!! Block me for more 2 days so that I can concentrate in my upcoming exam. [[User:Amrit Ghimire Ranjit|'''AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit"''']] 16:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:21, 23 November 2014

CONSIDERING RETIREMENT
Amrit Ghimire Ranjit is strongly considering retirement, although nothing is set in stone...


Welcome!

Hello, Amrit.ghimire13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gram atom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' 10:25, 3 August 2013 (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Anomalous expansion of water

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Anomalous expansion of water. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Water. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Water – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dewritech (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Gram atom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gram atom. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gram atomic mass. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gram atomic mass – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Matty.007 20:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amrit.ghimire13, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Amrit.ghimire13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Amrit.ghimire13, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jac16888 Talk 13:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!

About your message to my talk page.

Oh, you have mistake me with Lonedirewolf, he is that page's creator, not me. I just edit and design that page, not concern with content. Send your message to the right person. Sincerely. Ke ac lam viec tot (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Dotan (singer)

Hello Amrit.ghimire13. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dotan (singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Significance asserted - songs that have charted - enough to pass WP:A7 . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 14:14, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am one of the delegates at Featured topic candidates, and I would like to point out that I failed your nomination of a Nepal topic at Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Nepal/archive1 because it does not satisfy the criteria for a featured topic. Specifically, criterion 3, which states that all articles in a topic must at least be good articles, featured lists or featured articles, and since none of the articles in the proposed topic were at least GA, FL or FA, I failed the topic. Please read over the criteria again before proposing another topic in the future, thank you.-- 21:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:UserAmrit Ghimire.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UserAmrit Ghimire.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this page, which is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Please read Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. JohnCD (talk) 22:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hindu astrology. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that is making the article some how nation centric So I think it is necessary to revert that edit.

Category:Obtut

Category:Obtut, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For your reference, another editor has kindly created User:Amrit Ghimire Ranjit/Obtut for you. – Fayenatic London 07:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

THe BLPPROD was declined - you cannot add it back. Either use a normal PROD, or go for [[WP:AfD] Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Summer love (novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://hamroawaz.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/summer-love-novel.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Summer love (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Summer love (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer love (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had told you before to stop violating copyrights before and you have done that again when you had created an article on a non-notable subject that is Summer love (novel). Anything you would like to say? Bladesmulti (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten that in my own language. So I don't know how it is copyright voilation? Next An article on novel is not non-notable when it was most sold and youth-loved novel. AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hindu astrology, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not here to blame anyone but User:Bladesmulti is reverting every articles and edits by me.I have edit to remove it from nation centric article AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 05:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please add WP:RSed content to eliminate the nation-centric issue. Please see WP:PRESERVE Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Committee sanctions

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Template:Z33 Bladesmulti (talk) 08:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Summer love (novel). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 11:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Summer love (novel) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is adding reference and information.considered as vandalism? AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree files not allowed in userspace

Per WP:NFCC#9, nonfree files may only be displayed in article space. Your userpage is in userspace, not the article space. You may not display nonfree files on your userpage. You are allowed, however, to list them, in this format [[:File:FileIuploaded.jpg]], allowing a viewer of your page to click directly through to the file page. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I improved this article, so I am sure it will now be kept. Thank you for creating it! Is this the model on the cover, [1]? What is her name, the Google translate version to English is difficult to understand. And by the way, is Subin Bhattarai the John Green of Nepal now? I noted Subin got a big crowd for the sequel release.--Milowenthasspoken 21:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much.Exactly the site you provided is the correct one. The model characterised as Saaya" is Pranisha Shrestha.All info you told is correct one. AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 01:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

you added a blurb about the himalayas to the archives of DYK. You should know that that is NOT how such facts are added. there is a complex procedure for adding new facts, which your fact doesnt qualify as anyway. if you want to contribute, follow the links from the main page until you find the appropriate forum. the page you edited is NOT to be directly edited in that fashion. please dont do it again.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Khaste lake may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | area = 24.8030 hector total and water 13.7370 hector (0.21 sq km

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nepal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nepal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amrit Ghimire Ranjit -- Amrit Ghimire Ranjit (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amrit Ghimire Ranjit, it looks like you started this review by mistake: nominators are not allowed to review their own GA nominations. It's up to someone else to select the nomination for review, and they can't do that if you've apparently started your own review. I'm going to arrange to have the review page deleted, so the nomination has a chance to proceed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shree Amarsingh Model Higher Secondary School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Saaya novel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Saaya novel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha's birthplace

Read Gautama_Buddha#Conception_and_birth. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bladesmulti:Ok then I will publish Mahatma Gandhi was born in Nepal .Will the topic be disputed??

The whole world has accepted that Gautam Buddha was born in Nepal including UNESCO [1][2] Then Why are you Indian trying to spread the misconception?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrit Ghimire Ranjit (talkcontribs)

UNESCO's consideration is not enough, and it is not matching with most of the scholars, because Lumbini usually faces disagreement, although the country of present day would be Nepal, but it is also disputed that he was born in any Uttar Pradesh or Orissa. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Bladesmulti: You know what? You Indian can go to any level of Lies.Some time you tell Mt. Everest is in India. When you try to spread misconception on.Himalayas of Nepal toward the northern most part, then why would you leave Lumbini from dispute located in South? Are such scholars out of India claiming Buddha was born in India with proofs? Asoka pillar made by your king also state Nepal was born in Nepal. UNESCO agree on it. Whole world accept it. But you cannot bear it. Coz it will make benefit on Nepal's tourism na.You r the one who objected in Nepal's proposal of Peace zone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrit_Ghimire_Ranjit (talkcontribs)
Can you just simply drop these nonsensical assumptions and try basing your discussion on at least three factors like Wikipedia:Verify, Wikipedia:RS and Wikipedia:NPOV. There are many scholars outside India who considered his birth place in India.[2] If you continue to make remarks like you Indian can go to any level of Lies, I will have no other option than to seek a block on you for making personal attacks, this will be your last warning. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
last warning???????? AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit" 14:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For remarks that constitute personal attack. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/180
  2. ^ "Lumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha". UNESCO. Retrieved 1 March 2011.

November - 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Buddha (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


States and Nations

The word State has several meanings in English, one of which is a sovereign country. This is the way it is being used in British Raj, not as a constituent part of another country as in United States. A nation may refer to a state or country occupied by one people who share a common cultural and /or ethnic background, but is does not mean that the area is an independent state. For example. Scotland is a nation within the United Kingdom but it is not a state as it is not independent. Nepal is an independent state which is home for most of the Nepali nation. Hope this explains why your edits are being reverted. Dabbler (talk) 14:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is vandalism and what is not

Read Wikipedia:NOT VANDALISM and Wikipedia:VANDTYPES before you accuse of vandalism again.[3] It is also considered as personal attack.

You should write your own article if you want to. But it is not going to be possible with just these few sites. Read Wikipedia:Content forking and avoid it. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But you are doing personal attack by reverting all my edit .AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit" 14:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying about ANI

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Amrit_Ghimire_Ranjit Bladesmulti (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some friendly advice

Hi there. It seems that you are ignoring Wikipedia guidelines with your contributions to various Buddha/Asia articles, despite other editors informing you of the problems with these. Editing here is a privilege, not a right and if you continue down this road your editing rights may be suspended. Please discuss any changes that you wish to make on article talk pages to avoid further conflict. Thank you for your attention.  Philg88 talk 18:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have already crossed 3 reverts, don't revert again.

Can you tell me that why you are confusing Indian subcontinent with South Asia or how you think that Indian subcontinent is irrelevant to mention? Bladesmulti (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Template:History of South Asia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Philg88 talk 12:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Philg88: Thanks!!!! Block me for more 2 days so that I can concentrate in my upcoming exam. AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit" 16:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]