User talk:AHLM13: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
||
== Your Recent Editing Activity == |
|||
Hi. I notice that you have recently been editing a great many articles, frequently reverting changes made by anonymous IP addresses. Whilst it is certainly the case that anonymous editors sometimes vandalise pages, it is fairly clear that you have been deleting a great many perfectly reasonable edits too. It's quite easy to see from the timeline of your edits that you are making these edits without any thought. For example, at 16:41 on 9 June 2014 you made three edits in a minute, deleting entirely reasonable information that had been included by an anonymous editor with a blameless track-record and, evidently, some special expertise on [[Nicaragua]]. Earlier, at 16:31 on 9 June 2014 you made five edits in the space of sixty seconds. All of these edits had the effect of deleting reasonable information added by an anonymous editor who, though probably a little too enthusiastic, appears to have a genuine interest in and expertise about fictional cartoon characters. Where information is not supported by references, you should not delete it unless it is obviously vandalism, but should request references and citations that support the information. |
|||
The problem is that these are not isolated cases. At 16:35 you deleted an edit that contributed track timings for the [[The Civil War (album)]]; at 16:29 you ''restored'' text that is a matter of pure opinion (and thus shouldn't be included in Wikipedia) to our article on [[Nasson College]], presumably simply because the edit that deleted it was performed anonymously. There are many, many more. You have a consistent pattern of deleting the work of anonymous editors, irrespective of its usefulness. As an editor of Wikipedia, it is incumbent on you to [[WP:AGF|assume that other editors, whether registered or anonymous, are acting in good faith]]. You are making a great many mistakes, and actively damaging Wikipedia. |
|||
Please would you stop your unhelpful editing activity as soon as possible. Your current course of action is [[WP:DE|disruptive]], and is unlikely to lead to a positive outcome either for you or for this project on which we work. Thank you. |
|||
[[User:RomanSpa|RomanSpa]] ([[User talk:RomanSpa|talk]]) 08:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:29, 10 June 2014
| This is AHLM13's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, AHLM13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Covenant-breaker may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- used by [[Bahá'í Faith|Bahá'ís]] to refer to a particular form of what some might call "heresy". (Actually it refers to disunity: "The specific mission of Bahá'u'lláh relates to world unity. Since
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
AHLM13, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi AHLM13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your Recent Editing Activity
Hi. I notice that you have recently been editing a great many articles, frequently reverting changes made by anonymous IP addresses. Whilst it is certainly the case that anonymous editors sometimes vandalise pages, it is fairly clear that you have been deleting a great many perfectly reasonable edits too. It's quite easy to see from the timeline of your edits that you are making these edits without any thought. For example, at 16:41 on 9 June 2014 you made three edits in a minute, deleting entirely reasonable information that had been included by an anonymous editor with a blameless track-record and, evidently, some special expertise on Nicaragua. Earlier, at 16:31 on 9 June 2014 you made five edits in the space of sixty seconds. All of these edits had the effect of deleting reasonable information added by an anonymous editor who, though probably a little too enthusiastic, appears to have a genuine interest in and expertise about fictional cartoon characters. Where information is not supported by references, you should not delete it unless it is obviously vandalism, but should request references and citations that support the information.
The problem is that these are not isolated cases. At 16:35 you deleted an edit that contributed track timings for the The Civil War (album); at 16:29 you restored text that is a matter of pure opinion (and thus shouldn't be included in Wikipedia) to our article on Nasson College, presumably simply because the edit that deleted it was performed anonymously. There are many, many more. You have a consistent pattern of deleting the work of anonymous editors, irrespective of its usefulness. As an editor of Wikipedia, it is incumbent on you to assume that other editors, whether registered or anonymous, are acting in good faith. You are making a great many mistakes, and actively damaging Wikipedia.
Please would you stop your unhelpful editing activity as soon as possible. Your current course of action is disruptive, and is unlikely to lead to a positive outcome either for you or for this project on which we work. Thank you.