User talk:This is Paul

Reference Errors on 14 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 1999 in British television page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 in British television, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stuart Hall and Anne Mackenzie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1999 in British television may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the first elections to the [[Scottish Parliament general election, 1999|Scottish Parliament]] and [[Welsh Assembly election, 1999|Welsh Assembly, as well as the year's [[United Kingdom local

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi

Take a look at three articles that I created today Ann Heberlein, Johar Bendjelloul and Bengt Dalqvist. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Not really familiar with the people, but nice articles. This is Paul (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

• Investigative report: Hong Kong's Wikimania 2013—failure to produce financial statement raises questions of probity

• WikiProject report: Relaxing in Puerto Rico

• News and notes: 'Ask a librarian'—connecting Wikimedians with the National Library of Australia

• Featured content: On the rocks

• Traffic report: Eurovision, Google Doodles, Mothers, and 5 May

• Technology report: Technology report needs editor, Media Viewer offers a new look

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Suzannah Lipscomb

You seem to have a lot of history in editing Wikipedia pages and I do not. Indeed it is true that I have only ever edited Suzannah Lipscomb to add latest facts. This was fine until the argument with the user RedPenOfDoom about her marriage which the subject felt was irrelevant to a page put up by her employer about her professional activities. I am related to the subject so am not independent, but also I am not biased and aim to add only facts. The subject has only said she doesn't want a Wiki page because of the controversy, obviously otherwise she would want one and that is why in the talk about deleting it I said that you should be asked to clean it up. I am therefore writing to you on here to request your input to keeping the page without it constantly being changed. Why for instance I have wondered was reference to her degrees that I replaced last week again removed. Previously links to NCH or her own website have been sufficient proof. Also why should the two most notable awards have been removed. This must be evidence of attack and I wonder how Wiki deal with such things other than removing the page?Thank you.MdeBohun (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)