User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom: Difference between revisions
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: A pattern of edit warring |
||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 04:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 04:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Hello TheRedPen. You made seven reverts at [[Hotel California (2013 film)]] starting at 02:26 on 13 January. Since an admin might consider this to be long-term edit warring, I recommend that you respond in the complaint and agree to take a break from the article and its talk page for seven days. These reverts do not seem to be justified under any of the [[WP:3RRNO|exceptions to 3RR]]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 07:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:07, 15 January 2014
This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Holiday Cheer
Holiday Cheer | ||
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
January 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saarang may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | location=Chennai, India | work=The Hindu | title=Campus confluence | date=8 January 2004}}</ref>], Orange Street and [[Moksha]] (in 2005),<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.hindu.com/2005/01/24/
- [[Sulekha|Sulekha.com]],<ref>http://www.sulekha.com/saarang/</ref> 160by2, Amadeus global studios], miglebox.com.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vishal–Shekhar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''''Vishal–Shekhar''''' are a music directing duo (Vishal Dadlan] and Shekhar Ravjiani) working in Hindi, Telugu and [[Marathi cinema|Marathi]] films. Their works
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kolam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Kolam''' {{transl|ta|ISO|kõlaṁ}}) is a form of painting that is drawn using [[rice]] powder/chalk/chalk powder/white rock powder
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mohanlal filmography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | 2005 || [[Reflections (Silent Short film)]] || [[[Bejoy Nambiar]] ||
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
You are simply ruining a great source of information on the snowtown murders. I have gone through all your edits and made pdf saves of all of them, so I can retain all the information you're deleting. You are not helping this website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuriousWriter1 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll go save all my favorite wiki pages before you delete the crap out of them. Have fun policing wikipedia and making it less helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuriousWriter1 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Reversion of my commentary on Telangana suicides
By principle, I object to emotional justification of any issue citing examples of people committing suicide for a cause. Unfortunately, politics of Telangana has degraded from a cause that started with justification based on economic backwardness and exploitation to emotional justification based on cultural uniqueness and number of suicides. Having been brought up in Adilabad, the most backward district of Telangana, I have seen first hand the reasons for backwardness where people are left behind due to lack of will and development policies by the new generation of elected representatives who have vested economic interests.
Andhra Pradesh in particular has seen a increased number of suicides since 2000 even before Telangana agitation got revived. Regarding farmer suicides, respected journalist Sainath has written well researched articles that confirm this trend http://www.indiatogether.org/2011/dec/psa-suidata.htm. The same has been confirmed by NCRB http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-12-09/news/44989050_1_rehabilitation-package-dowry-dispute-andhra-pradesh. Youth unemployment has been exacerbated by institutions incentivized by government's social welfare programs through Fee_Reimbursement_Scheme_(Andhra_Pradesh) producing large number of graduates without proper skills. These socio economic factors have been exploited by politicians to further the cause of Telangana. It is a fact that some of these lives could have been saved without the suicide worship culture that has been pushed by these politicians. Movies released on telangana theme have repeated these disturbing images http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_vLxHcihTE influencing our youth. Even the mother of the first recorded student suicide has put a case stating that a local TRS politician instigated her son http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-ttoTsqrak to resort to suicide.
Regarding the wiki article, I am fine for the entire paragraph on suicides to be removed. However if the article were to retain the number of suicides to justify the movement, I want the alternative view on why the suicides occurred to be present as well.
Your recent editing history at Talk:Zwarte Piet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Blanking of article / redirect
Please can you explain why you blanked/redirected this article?. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, when someone is asked a question about blanking an article on their talk page the solution is not to ignore the talk and blank the article again. Please see WP:BRD. I have noted that you appear to be edit warring with User:CWH on the page you redirected it too as well. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- As there is no discussion, I will restore the article a second time. If you wish to delete an article then there is WP:AFD. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's reasonable to give an editor some time to respond. Round here it's after midnight on a Sunday, in the USA it's still Sunday.
- I've restored the article – although I would expect it to be blanked for a fourth time. One can only assume that both editors involved in blanking it haven't actually read the article and don't realise that there are more languages used in China than Chinese. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- As there is no discussion, I will restore the article a second time. If you wish to delete an article then there is WP:AFD. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
You caused a significant amount of disruption by your blanking of that article, wasting several hours of editor time. You were asked the question "(1) Please, for context, have you before blanked sourced articles with a substantial edit history and then blanked again when challenged? If so can you please give diffs to a couple of examples." You didn't address the questions, but the issue is there permanently now on the Talk page. Please do not blank sourced articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Stop changing!
hey, how dare you keep changing my edits? just look at all the bollywood stars and their filmography pages and tell me whats wrong? if you do this again I will report to senior mods!
Desirockerz (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Desirockerz You can't say that to anybody to stop editing unless you have given warnings Herald talk with me 12:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Look, I dont know if you realise or not that other wiki filmography also has list of movies that are releasing on future and looking at that case, I do not know why you are constently removing happy new year (movie) from SRK's filmography, if you are going to take effect on 1 page, that is not a great idea, if you are going to make changes on rest of the filmography pages, than do it. Desirockerz (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Unusual Deaths
I am unsure as to why you believe the source needs to specifically state that the death was unusual. I looked at other sources for different stories, such as the Segway death, and could not find a single mention of the word unusual, bizarre, or strange. Can you point me to somewhere where it states that this must be included in the reliable source? The addition has since been restored, but I would like to clarify with you about this so we can avoid any edit warring. Thank you. --Tarage (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I see. I was not aware of that stipulation. Well, here are two reliable sources that state that the death was unusual or strange. Take your pick.
- This should satisfy the criteria for inclusion, correct? --Tarage (talk) 11:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Date of birth Reed Alexander
All I did on the Reed Alexander page was to revert an anon-IP who had changed his year of birth from 1994 to 1995. I spent a lot of time trying to find a reliable source and failed, all I had was the tweet which confirmed the year. Now you come along and say "The source says 22". I am curious to know where this source is. The tweet is ambiguous because of time zones (it says 5am 23rd for me in the UK), and he did not necessarily send it on his actual birthday. Periglio (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Zach Line
Why are you erasing his weight? according to NFL.com he weights 233 pounds. 96.59.136.148 (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker)How is that encyclopaedic? Soham 18:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Surreal Barnstar | |
You're certainly a Wild Card, thats fo' sure and add "special flavour" to the Wikipedia for me, can't talk about others. Soham 18:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC) |
Dailypost
dailypost.com and sunnewsonline.com are reliable or not? Bladesmulti (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, but what about sunnewsonline.com? http://www.africanspotlight.com/ ? http://www.theheraldng.com/ ? Bladesmulti (talk) 14:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Remember, i am not arguing at all. Only having your own view about each of the sources, so if i use next time i am aware of multiple opinion already. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Multiple? So Theheraldng and Africanspotlight? Remember, nigeria is pretty remote for much of popular media, otherwise we surely had more RS. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fine, so you agree that information is needful, yet complicated? I should post at WP:RSN right? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Multiple? So Theheraldng and Africanspotlight? Remember, nigeria is pretty remote for much of popular media, otherwise we surely had more RS. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Remember, i am not arguing at all. Only having your own view about each of the sources, so if i use next time i am aware of multiple opinion already. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
http://www.dailytimes.com.ng/ and http://www.punchng.com/ have covered them as well, They are reliable? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Tribune.com(.ng) has also covered. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Done, have a opinion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Tamil Brahmins. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
fancruft
No evidence? What a joke you another joker you dont watch mlp wow really im just adding existing facts and they are true go watch the show and stop accusing me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireydash21 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Existing facts are just readded. I will report you for accusations and insults — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireydash21 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
ok
Itssan (talk) 16:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Shahrukh Khan filmography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm IndianBio. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ranveer Singh without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 19:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Join here again. And please stop edit warring over this. What is wrong with you? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Reliable source
Hello, I tried to make a change to an article, Treehouse attachment bolt, but you undid the edit because I didn't provide a reliable source. My source is my boss Scott Baker, who wants to be included in this article because he was involved in it. He has meet with Michael Garnier many times over the years (1997-2013) about tree biology and bio-mechanics and this detail where used in the designing of the attachment bolt. To cite him what would I do? Baker,Scott (1997-2013)?
Treesolutions (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)treesolutions
Strange?
I'm sure you have noticed this by now, but do you find it the least bit strange that a new editor[1] has popped up who seems to be targeting your edits in several articles? Even the very first edit that was made was to revert you. Cmr08 (talk) 02:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think that first edit is just the IP editor from that page starting an account and then going on a jihad because they had not been allowed to create a fanpage undisturbed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
Thanks for filing the DR/N. Soham 13:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC) |
- Wikipedia:Wikilawyering, sorry mate if you think so of my actions. I want the petty dispute to end, nothing else. Soham 13:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014 - edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mr Whoppit. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Jasmine Waltz Someone's dob is hardly controversial.--The Totter 02:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 04:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello TheRedPen. You made seven reverts at Hotel California (2013 film) starting at 02:26 on 13 January. Since an admin might consider this to be long-term edit warring, I recommend that you respond in the complaint and agree to take a break from the article and its talk page for seven days. These reverts do not seem to be justified under any of the exceptions to 3RR. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)