Jump to content

Talk:Clevedon Court/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
deadlink fixed
 
Line 18: Line 18:


#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: Generally well written. Could the '''Interior''' section be expanded slightly. Perhaps some idea of the layout?[[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: Generally well written. <s>Could the '''Interior''' section be expanded slightly. Perhaps some idea of the layout?[[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s>{{done}}
:::Expanded.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::Expanded.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: "causing national scandal" - I think this would read better as "causing ''a'' national scandal". [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>"causing national scandal" - I think this would read better as "causing ''a'' national scandal".</s> <s>[[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC</s>) {{DONE}}
:::Changed&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::Changed&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''([[WP:FNNR|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:a ''([[WP:FNNR|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: ref #3 Annual Archæological Review 2001–2002" - I can find nothing there that supports "but the evidence, based on excavations to the South of the house in 1961/62, is now known to be uncertain.". Perhaps I missed it? [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>ref #3 Annual Archæological Review 2001–2002" - I can find nothing there that supports "but the evidence, based on excavations to the South of the house in 1961/62, is now known to be uncertain.". Perhaps I missed it? [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s>{{DONE}}
:::I've reworded this as I agree the claim is not fully supported but this seems to be the only reference to Roman remains - its not in more recent sources so I have left the word speculation.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::I've reworded this as I agree the claim is not fully supported but this seems to be the only reference to Roman remains - its not in more recent sources so I have left the word speculation.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: ref #13 "Mary Elton Primary School". - There is nothing there to confirm that the school was named after this Mary Elton. I am sure that it was named after her, but we need evidence. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>ref #13 "Mary Elton Primary School". - There is nothing there to confirm that the school was named after this Mary Elton. I am sure that it was named after her, but we need evidence. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s>{{done}}
:::New reference which states this.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::New reference which states this.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: what makes The Gardening website (ref #38), TourUK (ref #24), Britain's Finest (ref #26) and AboutBritain.com (ref #39) [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]? [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>what makes The Gardening website (ref #38), TourUK (ref #24), Britain's Finest (ref #26) and AboutBritain.com (ref #39) [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]? [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s>{{done}}
:::Removed/replaced&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::Removed/replaced&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: {http://www.davenapier.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mayors/history1.htm} is a personal website, not RS [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>{http://www.davenapier.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mayors/history1.htm} is a personal website, not RS [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s>{{done}}
:::Replaced&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::Replaced&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: same for {http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/baronetse.htm} [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>same for {http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/baronetse.htm} [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s>{{done}}
:::Replaced&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:::Replaced&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''([[WP:Scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[WP:LENGTH|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:a ''([[WP:Scope|major aspects]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[WP:LENGTH|focused]])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
Line 45: Line 45:
#:: stable
#:: stable
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' and other media, where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[WP:FUR|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|}} b ''([[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|appropriate use]] with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free content have [[WP:FUR|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|appropriate use]] with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: I am worried about the copyright status of [[:File:W Phot c1950.jpg ‎]] and [[:File:W Phot c1920.jpg ‎]] ands have nomitaed for deletion at commons so that a judgement can be made. Same applies to [[:File:Clevedon Court.jpg]] [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 16:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <s>I am worried about the copyright status of [[:File:W Phot c1950.jpg ‎]] and [[:File:W Phot c1920.jpg ‎]] ands have nomitaed for deletion at commons so that a judgement can be made. Same applies to [[:File:Clevedon Court.jpg]] [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 16:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</s> Well two have been deleted and the other kept so that is now satsfied. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC){{done}}
:::If necessary I can replace these with other images - however they do help with the historical perspective which isn't really provided by the other pics in the commons cat.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
:::If necessary I can replace these with other images - however they do help with the historical perspective which isn't really provided by the other pics in the commons cat.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 21:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
#'''Overall''':
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#::All good now, I am happy to promote this. Sorry about the delay before getting back to this, real life intervened. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->

Latest revision as of 13:35, 17 June 2013

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 12:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Found and tagged another dead link. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I could only find one tagged deadlink - which I have fixed.— Rod talk 21:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Generally well written. Could the Interior section be expanded slightly. Perhaps some idea of the layout?Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
    Expanded.— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    "causing national scandal" - I think this would read better as "causing a national scandal". Jezhotwells (talk) 13:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)  Done
    Changed— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    ref #3 Annual Archæological Review 2001–2002" - I can find nothing there that supports "but the evidence, based on excavations to the South of the house in 1961/62, is now known to be uncertain.". Perhaps I missed it? Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
    I've reworded this as I agree the claim is not fully supported but this seems to be the only reference to Roman remains - its not in more recent sources so I have left the word speculation.— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    ref #13 "Mary Elton Primary School". - There is nothing there to confirm that the school was named after this Mary Elton. I am sure that it was named after her, but we need evidence. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
    New reference which states this.— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    what makes The Gardening website (ref #38), TourUK (ref #24), Britain's Finest (ref #26) and AboutBritain.com (ref #39) reliable sources? Jezhotwells (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
    Removed/replaced— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    {http://www.davenapier.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mayors/history1.htm} is a personal website, not RS Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
    Replaced— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    same for {http://www.leighrayment.com/baronetage/baronetse.htm} Jezhotwells (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
    Replaced— Rod talk 21:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Broad and of suitable length, focussed. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV Jezhotwells (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    stable
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I am worried about the copyright status of File:W Phot c1950.jpg ‎ and File:W Phot c1920.jpg ‎ ands have nomitaed for deletion at commons so that a judgement can be made. Same applies to File:Clevedon Court.jpg Jezhotwells (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Well two have been deleted and the other kept so that is now satsfied. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Done[reply]
If necessary I can replace these with other images - however they do help with the historical perspective which isn't really provided by the other pics in the commons cat.— Rod talk 21:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    All good now, I am happy to promote this. Sorry about the delay before getting back to this, real life intervened. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]