Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Requesting full protection of WWE Capitol Punishment. (TW)
Line 8: Line 8:
==Current requests for protection==
==Current requests for protection==
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
==== {{la|WWE Capitol Punishment}} ====
'''Temporary full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring – There's another edit war going on this shouldn't have gone from full to unprotected. This page is out of control. [[User:Nascarking|'''''<font face="century gothic" color="#000000">Voices in my Head</font>''''']] [[User talk:Nascarking|'''''<font face="century gothic" color="#556B2F"><small>WWE</small></font>''''']] 20:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
==== {{la|Vic Mignogna}} ====
==== {{la|Vic Mignogna}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – I've seen 4 persons have reverted this article due to vandalism out of which three are unregistered users. [[User:Ramajois|Shriram]] ([[User talk:Ramajois|talk]]) 20:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – I've seen 4 persons have reverted this article due to vandalism out of which three are unregistered users. [[User:Ramajois|Shriram]] ([[User talk:Ramajois|talk]]) 20:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:31, 11 June 2011

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's another edit war going on this shouldn't have gone from full to unprotected. This page is out of control. Voices in my Head WWE 20:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I've seen 4 persons have reverted this article due to vandalism out of which three are unregistered users. Shriram (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Event is today, the usual IP vandalism has already started.(Justinsane15 (talk) 19:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see page history, the same IPs keep adding false info . Caldorwards4 (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes-protect. High level of unsourced additions, please bump page from semi-protection to Pending changes protection. Shadow (talk) 17:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 17:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 17:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content and fabrications. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection:I think these days some people do bad edits on it. Keivan.f (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced DOB and other trivia. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:18, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: user request . Baseball Watcher 15:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection: Not just IP's anymore, registered users just joined the revert party. Xeworlebi (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Also, an admin might want to comment at Talk:Winter Is Coming#Inquiry for Administrative Staff after their decision for (or against) protection. Xeworlebi (talk) 15:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    {{RFPP|ap|Fastily}}. Baseball Watcher 15:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm aware of that, that's why I'm asking for full protection not semi. Xeworlebi (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: IP socks of User:Cláudio César Dias Baptista keep readding original research to article. Cláudio César Dias Baptista has been protected for the same reason. The user should be blocked soon due to use of sockpuppets to fake consensus on the articles' AfDs. XXX antiuser eh? 14:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 14:45, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Constant changes of his current club to all manner of teams he has been linked to has continued since last semi-protection expired. doomgaze (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 13:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping editor (likely another editor editing without logging in) intent on adding unreferenced (now trying with links that fail WP:RS) original research into the article to try to make a point in a related dispute. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Question: what's the related dispute? Rami R 13:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    See Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts#Tjprochazka, along with an ANI discussion, the Slap Bet talk page and Tjprochazka's recent edit history. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 14:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Again, unreasonable war times or more in the article. In my opinion, an attempt to provide the scientists' view of Sciences as a purely "position of Russian science" is a reductio ad absurdum. Firstly it is not true ([1]), and secondly it is a game with rules, so it requires from the opponents extra and unnecessary sources. And of course, with such understatement of criticism is "cleansing "of pseudoscientific theories. P.S Now even better - the participant wrote that removes the replay at the same time making a return to his version Mistery Spectre (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Then you can transfer this message to the administrators? I just do not know already what to do when a person is hollywar in a wiki and at the same time for a single corrects the fact that he was not given in the first Mistery Spectre (talk) 17:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: IP users changing his current club on the basis of transfer speculation, unreliable websites etc. doomgaze (talk) 11:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 14:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. doomgaze (talk) 11:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rami R 14:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Rcsprinter (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator Mike Rosoft.. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users keep adding unsourced statements for the past few days. Commander (Ping Back) 09:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) These issues are spreadout quite... thinly, there hasn't been any sustained disruption at all. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 7:40pm • 09:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-Protect. The lifting of last semi-protection in the article did not help stop the unnecessary additions and deletions mainly by IP addresses, which still resulted in a rather large wave of reverting edits. The "semi-protection" may need to be longer or permanent; the unnecessary additions and deletions has already caught my attention a while after the last semi-protection, and there could be more of those later given that new episodes of the show airs on weekends. CHAK 001 (talk) 05:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP spamming/vandalism through edit-warring. . Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection requested for one month. 12 edits by IP addresses in three days. At least one participant is probably an IP sock of a banned user. This can calm down, please. I dropped out of trying to watch this article a few days ago, it just keeps going back and forth. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users keep adding unsourced DVD volumes every once in awhile. JamesAlan1986 (talk) 09:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Indefinite semi-protection: Who in their right mind would unprotect this? This page is a /b/tard magnet!. --The Σ talkcontribs 04:43, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Actually, I don't think this is getting that much vandalism. I'll leave this for someone else, though. J.delanoygabsadds 05:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, clubot might not mind reverting but I'm getting sick of it. Agreed /b/ is here insmall but on-going spurts!--Torchwoodtwo (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It started getting hit about four hours after the original request. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection requested for six months. Not quite boiling revert war in progress involving IPs. At least one participant is probably an IP sock of a banned user. No significant contribution has come from an IP on this article in more than a year, but the IP revert warring extends back at least that long. I dropped out of trying to watch this article a few days ago, it just keeps going back and forth. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Trying this first to see if it will get them to use the talk page. J.delanoygabsadds 06:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=433770958"