User talk:Shmayo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:36, 29 March 2010

Template:Syriac_ethnicity

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Syriac_ethnicity, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Also remember that there is a discussion talkpage. Thank you. The TriZ (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Syriac music. Thank you. ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 02:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Instead of removing everything that has to do with aramean-syriacs, why not instead contribute to assyran related articles. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 23:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Syriac people has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis^(talk) 14:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Syriac people constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Flewis^(talk) 14:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote to change name back to original

Hello Shmayo please vote to move the Assyrian/chadlean/syriac people page back to the Assyrian people. Your vote counts here at the "Move PAge back to Assyrian people" on the discussion page of the assyrian article. its toward the end of the page. 69.226.111.182 (talk) 04:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your participation is requested.

Hello Shmayo,

Please provide your input here. The vote to which the user above has referred you, and the discussion concerning it, have been updated.

Thanks.

--Šarukinu (talk) 23:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

assryain syriac article

hur kan vi ens ha en artikel som assyrian/chaldean/syriac people artikeln? Den är i jävligt dåligt skick. När vi hade en assrrisk och en syriansk artikel så var det bäst så. Innehållet i Syriac people är helt annorlunda än innehållet i assyrian/chaldean/syriac people. Röstade vi inte för att splitta artikeln? Varför låta en person styra och bestämma medan vi är flera styckna som har röstat för? AramaeanSyriac (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Om vi splittrar artikeln så kommer jobbiga disamb-sidor att behövas. Är det inte bättre att ha en artikel än att behöva skapa en disamb-sida och flera artiklar? Och varför ska vi ha flera artiklar för ett och samma folk? Shmayo (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Det är två artiklar. en Assyrian people och en Syriac people. Alltså nuvarande artikel är Kass! Dessutom är det otroligt mkt vandalism på aritkeln och edit krig och reverts. två artiklar skulle underlätta allt. AramaeanSyriac (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi Shmayo, this is a warning to stop edit warring at Middle East and other articles. A quick glance at the history of this page shows that while there has been frequent reverting on the main article, there has been zero discussion about it on the corresponding talk page. Although there appears to be one or two reverts each day, please keep in mind that users can still be blocked for edit warring, regardless of whether they violate the three-revert rule or not. The 3RR is not some kind of magic barrier, and gaming the system is considered equally disruptive. Please stop edit warring or else blocks of some shape or form will have to be issued. Chaldean and The TriZ have also been warned. Thanks, Khoikhoi 23:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignatius Zakka I Iwas

My apologies. I didn't notice your reversion and also reverted the change. But I did add "Christian convert" which might explain the name and stop a future change. I might not have done anything had I noticed your reversion. Sorry. Student7 (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Shmayo. You have new messages at Talk:Baqofah#citations.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of Syriac people has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page List of Syriac people. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syria Etymology

Shmayo, please join the discussion on the subject until we can find a proper compromise. In the mean time stop reverting material that is well sourced. I say this with absolute good faith, I am neither part to any of the two sides and my main concern is that this edit-war is harming the Syria article. Please join the discussion on the talk page, and let's find a reasonable compromise. Happy Editing! Yazan (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption.2C_3RR.2C_vandalism_and_insult_from_User:Shmayo. Thank you.Toddst1 (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop WP:Hounding and reverting Dejwono (talk · contribs). It is not constructive and may lead to blocking. In addition, you need to be more WP:Civil in you communication. Toddst1 (talk) 14:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reverting edits that are doing no good! He should read WP:NPOV and old discussions before editing! Shmayo (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC) ^[reply]

And plese stop WP:STALKing me. Dejwono (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have articles that I think I have knowledge in on mine watchlist, that is not stalking. Learn how to discuss. Shmayo (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for WP:Hounding and edit warring across multiple articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You were clearly WP:Hounding. Your comment seems to indicate intent to continue this conflict. If you continue this behavior after your block is released, you will be blocked for an extended period. Toddst1 (talk) 14:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if my last post here was removed, or if it wasn't posted because you edited your post while I was writing. Anyway, I just wrote that User:Dejwono's edits are very similar to User:AramaeanSyriac's edit. In fact, it's the second time a new user (the last one was blocked, suckpuppet of AramaeanSyriac) writes exactly the same think as AramaeanSyriac did in the etymology-section in the article of Syria. And this time it makes me very angry, because last time we discussed this very, very much. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Syria#Etyomology, and now he reverted back to the POV-version of AramaeanSyriac again. This should be reverted to the version we talked about here 1. I'll check more carefully if Dejwono is AramaeanSyriac later. Have a nice day! Shmayo (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it was an edit conflict. Let me look at the edits and we'll see if a WP:CU is necessary. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, what I thought...

Can his edits be undone? After all, AramaeanSyriac was first blocked for his edits. Shmayo (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe they have been globally reverted. Toddst1 (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shmayo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I reverted a new users edits. This user should have read old discussions about Assyrians/Syrics. His edits shows clearly how it doesn't care about the talkpages. I was following everything that we have said on the talkpages. Again, I was only reverting things that we come to an conclusion to in talkpages, and this users edits was against there conclusions. Still he didn't disscuss. Please check old talkpages! Thank you! Shmayo (talk) 15:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring. Whether you were right or wrong in the dispute is not the point. Edit warring is not the way to resolve disputes. Next time ask for page protection instead. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alqosh

Alqosh is a Kaldaya town you cannot call it an Assyrian town. it is not true. there are several Alqoshnaye who said that already on the talk page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if it is Chaldean Catholic, Nestorian or Syriac. It's not about the church denomination. Shmayo (talk) 15:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is an ethnic Assyrian town. Funny how the Assyrian Democratic Movement won Alqosh and Telkepe, the two major Assyrian towns of Chaldean Catholic denomiation, is it not ܥܝܪܐܩ?--Yohanun (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrians and Chaldeans

See my comment at Talk:Tel Skuf. It applies to every article where you are pushing to call Chaldeans "Assyrians". You have misunderstood and/or misrepresented the consensus at Assyrian people, which only applies to the title of that article and not to the naming of the Chaldean and Syriac minorities as a whole. (Taivo (talk) 23:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 It is an ethnic Assyrian town. Funny how the Assyrian Democratic Movement won Alqosh and Telkepe, the two major Assyrian towns of Chaldean Catholic denomiation, is it not ܥܝܪܐܩ?--[[User:Assyria 90|Yohanun]] ([[User talk:Assyria 90|talk]]) 23:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
+== Assyrians and Chaldeans ==
+See my comment at [[Talk:Tel Skuf]].  It applies to every article where you are pushing to call Chaldeans "Assyrians".  You have misunderstood and/or misrepresented the consensus at [[Assyrian people]], which only applies to the title of that article and not to the naming of the Chaldean and Syriac minorities as a whole.  ([[User:Taivo|Taivo]] ([[User talk:Taivo|talk]]) 23:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC))