Talk:Eric Lerner: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:42, 5 November 2005

The ideas which Lerner espouses are generally regarded as so outlandish by mainstream physicists that he is essentially ignored in that community.

Prove it.

-- Deleted it, it's completely unncessary in a discussion of his credentials (as the article now stands).

No actually its a perfectly necessary and relevant little tidbit when talking about a total fucking nutter like Lerner.--Deglr6328 21:42, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:25, 5 November 2005 edit 70.33.11.25 (talk) →NPOV ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:42, 5 November 2005 edit undo Deglr6328 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,986 edits →NPOV Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	-- Deleted it, it's completely unncessary in a discussion of his credentials (as the article now stands).		-- Deleted it, it's completely unncessary in a discussion of his credentials (as the article now stands).

			:No actually its a perfectly necessary and relevant little tidbit when talking about a total fucking nutter like Lerner.--[[User:Deglr6328\|Deglr6328]] 21:42, 5 November 2005 (UTC)