Jump to content

User talk:212.17.85.18: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with 'Please [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/disclaimer/ read their disclaimer]:<blockquote>Other pages which may be linked to the UCL home page or to other UCL pages, or which ha...'
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Please [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/disclaimer/ read their disclaimer]:<blockquote>Other pages which may be linked to the UCL home page or to other UCL pages, or which have a UCL address, may have been published by departments of UCL or other units of the College or associated with the College, or by staff or students acting entirely in a personal capacity. UCL takes no responsibility for the consequences of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any basis of a contract with readers or users of it.</blockquote>
Please [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/disclaimer/ read their disclaimer]:<blockquote>Other pages which may be linked to the UCL home page or to other UCL pages, or which have a UCL address, may have been published by departments of UCL or other units of the College or associated with the College, or by staff or students acting entirely in a personal capacity. UCL takes no responsibility for the consequences of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any basis of a contract with readers or users of it.</blockquote>
[http://www.gk.ro]: this is an unreliable source. Please add only reliable sources. Thank you. [[User:Squash Racket|Squash Racket]] ([[User talk:Squash Racket|talk]]) 10:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
[http://www.gk.ro]: this is an unreliable source. Please add only reliable sources. Thank you. [[User:Squash Racket|Squash Racket]] ([[User talk:Squash Racket|talk]]) 10:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

{{3RR}} [[User:Squash Racket|Squash Racket]] ([[User talk:Squash Racket|talk]]) 13:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:43, 29 July 2008

Please read their disclaimer:

Other pages which may be linked to the UCL home page or to other UCL pages, or which have a UCL address, may have been published by departments of UCL or other units of the College or associated with the College, or by staff or students acting entirely in a personal capacity. UCL takes no responsibility for the consequences of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

[1]: this is an unreliable source. Please add only reliable sources. Thank you. Squash Racket (talk) 10:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Squash Racket (talk) 13:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]