User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA2: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:31, 22 April 2008

Archives and sandboxes

In recognition of your efforts on Wikipedia and for dedication to law oriented edits, I, Cdogsimmons, award you the **Society Barnstar**.

Defender

		The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		In recognition & thanks for your efforts in helping us work our way towards consensus towards making Battle of Washita River a good WP:NPOV (instead of WP:SOAP) article. Still a lotta work to do, but now we can do it, in no small part because of your help. Yksin 20:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Wikinews

FYI you are mentioned in the Wikinews article n:California student arrested in criminal threats made on Wikipedia, just thought I should give you a heads up. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. It's on the main page of Wikinews but was bumped from Lead 1 to Lead 4. :) Cheers, Cirt (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

I wanted to create titty as a redirect to breast, but noticed that it was previously deleted (by you) as "patent nonsense". Could you explain why this is not a valid redirect? Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 00:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't redirect when I deleted it, it was recreated from a prior deletion and contained a single nonsense sentence. Looking further back in its history, it was originally a redirect to breast, then redirected to tit in August 2006 (edit summary indicated it was more appropriate than redirecting to breast) and ultimately deleted by another admin back in September 2006 before the recent recreation. I don't know the particulars of that deletion, but I don't suppose I would have any objection to it being redirected to tit. Dreadstar † 16:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Award!

		The Vandal Eliminator Award
		I, Stormtracker94, award you the Vandal Eliminator Award for amazing vandal fighting and RC Patrol. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 17:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking required

I think a blocking period is required for user : Britrailclass 91, to let him/her calm down and to stop the personal attacks. Never before has my page been so affected! Btline (talk) 18:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How To Destroy the Universe

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/How_To_Destroy_the_Universe--AndyCook (talk) 06:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

would you say that if i re-added the page with some links other hypotheses from reliable places, that this would be good to stay then? (i assume other people will still have issues but between me and you?) --AndyCook (talk) 06:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, User_talk:AndyCook/HTDTU what do you think? --AndyCook (talk) 07:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(moving discussion off AndyCook's talk page) I agree that blogs aren't WP:RS, and since I can't find any notable source for this event, I'm think it should be delisted from the request page -- what do you think? I was just pointing out that the initial creation was for the wrong subject entirely. nneonneo ^talk 01:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 : would you say that if i re-added the page with some links other hypotheses from reliable places, that this would be good to stay then? (i assume other people will still have issues but between me and you?) --[[User:AndyCook|AndyCook]] ([[User talk:AndyCook|talk]]) 06:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 :: Hi again, [[User_talk:AndyCook/HTDTU]] what do you think? --[[User:AndyCook|AndyCook]] ([[User talk:AndyCook|talk]]) 07:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
+:(moving discussion off AndyCook's talk page) I agree that blogs aren't [[WP:RS]], and since I can't find any notable source for this event, I'm think it should be delisted from the request page -- what do you think? I was just pointing out that the initial creation was for the wrong subject entirely. [[User:nneonneo|nneonneo]] <sup>[[User_talk:nneonneo|talk]]</sup> 01:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)