User talk:Pengo/archive 5

Archive: page 1 page 2 page 3 is the history of page 4. page 4

Editing Biological_classification.svg

Hi there. I've made some tweaks to your image on biological classification (just tweaking colours and typefaces, hope you don't mind!) but I can't find anywhere to upload a new version, and I didn't want to create a new file. Could you tell me where I could do this? Thanks so much. Mr.absurd 22:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

hi

hihihihihi hi. HEy look at that ! ciltr's climatic zone is almost the same as pengos!!! nice gif! Cilstr 04:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC) helo agin. how can i tel exactly how many edits i have done?? (feast is on soon)Cilstr 12:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Taxobox

Hi, I come here since you have been closely involved with the taxobox template. Could you tell me what is wrong at Bibasis oedipodea ? Feel free to point me elsewhere. Thanks. Shyamal 08:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, skip my note. It's fixed. Shyamal 10:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Chub Leuciscus cephalus >>> Grass carp Ctenoharyngodon idelaa

You have misnamed a picture in the wikimedia commons. It is clearly a grass carp (lips).Viridiflavus 18:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix it up —Pengo 23:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Greenhouse Mafia and Lonie Report

I appreciate your thanking me for contributing Greenhouse Mafia.

The Lonie Report of 1980 is proof to me that vested interests have been dictating government policy in Australia for a lot longer than Howard has been Prime Minister. The ability of mineral and car companies to control transport and energy policy probably dates back to the "Northern Development" mania of the Menzies era, which gave companies access to by far the largest mineral deposits on Earth and allowed them to not only control politicians but also to dictate who gets promoted to the road and public transport bureaucracies - making sure the road bureaucracy is much more effective and assertive than the public transport one.

Luokehao, 19:26, 10 April 2007

Latin name

Hello, I'm not sure you remember me from User_talk:Pengo/archive_4#Latin_name, but I asked about scientific name etymology, I simply come to tell you I found this : The Century Dictionary, some names are there, but it's not perfect. Hope it can help you as much as me. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 21:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Pengo/taxotest

Right, sorry about this, but that page has found its way into three article categories. These are categories that readers will use to navigate the encyclopedia and find pages similar to the one they are already reading, and so it is innappropriate for userpages to find their way in. As a temporary solution, I have blanked the page. In future, please try to avoid placing it into those categories- perhaps create a mirror of the templates or something, without the cats. J Milburn 09:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Change of plan, I am not blanking, another user is dealing with it with WP:AWB. J Milburn 09:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

No worries. If they get bored with AWB I don't mind it being blanked really. —Pengo 09:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I was going to use AWB until I realized all the categories were added via transcluded templates, so looks like blanking it is. Feel free to recreate a subst'd version of the page without categories, though. VegaDark 10:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah you can hide the categories with a template parameter, but i'll just unblank the page while I need it. easier. —Pengo 10:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Lions’ age mereger

The suggestion to merge sounds 'automatic' - not everything that has same topic should be mereged to generic pages (where upon will be lost). Lions’ age has meaning outside of the generic lion page. I preserve the right not to share 'automatic' suggestions toward merger. user:kosigrim

Merge

You need to add a section on the talk page to explain the merge. Are the species given under right wale the only ones in the Family? gren グレン 04:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I've put an explanation on the talk page now: Talk:Right_whale#Merge_from_Balaenidae_.2F_crammed_article —Pengo 06:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ap indonesia activist munir 2101.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ap indonesia activist munir 2101.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Missing image Image:Finny.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Finny.svg, by Strangerer, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Finny.svg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Finny.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Finny.svg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Concern regarding citation added to Gunns#Gunns 20

I'm a little uneasy about the citation you added to the referenced section, because I really don't think it meets WP:NOR being a information from a primary participant in the case. If it was say a link to a news article reporting on the case that covered the claims of the participants then it would pass. However, because the page in question being linked to is a primary source and is heavy on POV it really shouldn't be included particularly given the emotional and highly charged nature of the subject matter being covered. Please contact me via my talk page with any questions. Cheers, Thewinchester ^(talk) 07:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The claim it's supporting is that opposing parties consider the case to be silencing criticism, so of course it's going to be someone with that POV saying it. —Pengo 07:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

That's kind of the point i'm getting at. If we can find another source for this it would be much better all things considered. It's fine if they've said it, ensuring that the comment was reported by a media or similar organisation which meets the secondary sources criteria, it would be the better reference to use. Thewinchester ^(talk) 07:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

He said it, He's said that he's said it. Why do you think we need another source to say that he's said what he says he's said? —Pengo 07:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Oblique rays diagram

Hi, I would like to nominate Image:Oblique rays.svg for a Featured Picture, but I think it needs a bit of touch up. I have requested peer review with some suggestions for improvement here. Maybe you could work on a couple of things that I mention? Thanks, Cacophony 06:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I like the improvements and have nominated at it Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Oblique rays 02 Pengo.svg. Thanks, Cacophony 07:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

TinyLinux

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on TinyLinux, by Someguy1221 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because TinyLinux fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Closing admin forgot to delete

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting TinyLinux, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate TinyLinux itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Stalk (botany)

Hi! The redirect you made from Stalk (botany) to the disambiguation page Stem is, sorry to say, very unhelpful. The page doesn't have any relation to stalk as a botanical term, nor does even Plant stem (which I assume you intended) mention the term "stalk" in any single point. Do you think you could start an article for Stalk (botany), or if you think it's not worth an article, at least add the term somewhere in Plant stem? I know I can't, so that's why I'm asking. Actually, even a red link to Stalk (botany) would be more helpful, since then somebody with more knowledge could do the job, seeing it's not already done... Thanks! Malhonen 20:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 24 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tree hollow, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 16:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Centipede: How to link to a primary topic

Regarding your reversion of the change I made to the centipede (disambiguation) page. Thank you for trying to help, but the original was the standard format.

Please read WP:MOSDAB, specifically ""Linking to a primary topic" for more info. All the best,

Fourohfour 20:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

That wasn't a reversion, it was a revision, making the list readable with subheadings instead of a jumbled mess. —Pengo 22:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

XO-1 request: move and split

See this Talk:XO-1 section and please comment... the page is still a confusing mixture of topics and views. +sj + 00:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

hadrosaurs: thanks!

Hi Pengo - thanks so much for creating the image map template of the hadrosaur image - it's a really nice contribution to the image and its article! Debivort 04:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Pengo,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Lifezones Pengo.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 15, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-07-15. howcheng {chat} 23:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Yoda Stories.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yoda Stories.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

RE:Wikimedia Administrators

Request to join group and voila. :) -- 我♥中國 05:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Endangered Pimelea spicata

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, Image:Pimelea spicata 01 Pengo.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 06:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

POTD

Hi Pengo,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Pimelea spicata 01 Pengo.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 15, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-15. howcheng {chat} 18:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Image

I saw that you put those circles on this image and I was wondering if you could put those same circles here if you have the time .Bewareofdog 01:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:QA

Template:QA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. I thought this might get noticeable usage despite objections that it wasn't logically useful, and waited a long time, but 'snot hap'nin'.  :-/ Nothing personal! — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 04:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Tuna in Australia

Hi there. I was reading out tuna article and noticed a paragraph that you seem to have added here (apologies if I've parsed the edits incorrectly). I'm a little confused by it. What else would be in the can (i.e. taking up the other 49%)? Now that the standard has been "dropped", does that mean that you could sell a completely empty can and call it tuna? To be honest, I first thought it was a prank edit, but you're obviously no vandal. If you get a moment, perhaps you could clarify or rephrase...? Cheers! Matt Deres 23:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

The rest could be oil, water, or "brine" (salt water), I guess. —Pengo 23:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:EurekaFlag602.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:EurekaFlag602.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 07:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

wiki-nonsense talk

There is no guideline or policy whatsoever that makes it necessary to source a "secure" status in the absence of disagreement over it. Look at Verbascum thapsus and if you can find a good way to source that...

Also, single-paragraph sections, especially ones as short as the one you were recreating, are strongly discouraged by the manual of style, and have long been a criterion for opposing at FAC. splitting that paragraph into its section for the sole purpose of internal-linking is at best misguided, at worst petty (as if the "name and symbolism" section wasn't troublesome enough already!). Circeus 01:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't care for unreferenced duck-y "secure". I do care about people improperly replacing that with a "Least concern" category, though (because least concern is only okay for species formally assessed vy the IUCN). In my opinion, a species should be marked "secure" in the absence of a global statement to the contrary, or controversy over status. If a species is not in any endangerment category, then what should we call it if not "secure"? Circeus 03:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Nothing. It should be left blank. Status means a status from some external authority. The reader can decide for him or herself when reading the article that the species is not threatened with extinction. But if no one else has said it, we don't. —Pengo 03:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

thoughts on the nature of humanity

Pengo, you noted "Sex for enjoyment [and perhaps bonobos]" as a defining feature of humanity. I want to present the counter-argument that this is actually an effect of a different characteristic that sets us apart, even from bonobos. Whereas most animal species have an almost entirely food, shelter, and sex-centric society, humanity has achieved relative security with these basics throughout much of our history (the only great threat to us has been ourselves) and is notable because it is the only species which has been capable of marginalizing the necessity for sex. Sex is not the top thing on everyone's mind for our species, and that has allowed us to make significant advances in a great many other areas. Additionally, marginalizing sex in this way has turned it into a partly recreational activity. OcciMoron 15:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your thoughts on the nature of humanity.. the idea that "Sex for enjoyment" sets humans (& bonobos) apart from the other animals isn't my own idea.. and i have it listed under "Stupid theories on what sets humans apart" with a bunch of other half-witted theories for that reason.. (I'd like to start an article on these theories some day, or at least add them to the human article or the like).

But you've made some interesting points.. But I have to say that observing various animals in the wild and at zoos, it seems that most animals spend the vast majority of their time doing something other than procreating. So it's hard to say their lives or societies are all that sex-centric. However, sex is still a necessity in the human and animal worlds. Relationships, love stories, and sex are central in any human culture. And I believe sex will only become a marginal activity when sex and reproduction are completely isolated from each other. Which I don't think the majority is ever going to like the idea of all that much, I don't think would ever be completely possible. —Pengo 21:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, animals do spend time doing other activities, but generally they are a means to the end of reproduction, all residing at the very lowest part of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Occasionally animals with high parental involvement make forays into the second level of that hierarchy, but that is only ever in a context of maintaining reproductive fitness. Humans have a *need* to fulfill the other categories, which has led to incredible staying power as a species. OcciMoron 15:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't accept Maslow's hierarchy as anything more than a moralistic hypothesis, with little basis in science (i.e. it's not testable, especially not with animals). There's no reason your argument that animals do all they do to aid reproduction (or the furthering of their kin) cannot apply to humans. The only difference with animals is that they can't tell you otherwise. —Pengo 00:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Have a barnstar for your contribs - Pheonix15 13:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

And in the morning when I woke there was no Antonio
Just some money that he’d left for the memory of me
And oh my beautiful guitar, that’s what really broke my heart
Had been stolen by the two-faced low lothario
Charlotte Hatherley xx Charlotte Hatherley 05:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Gordon Splits

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Gordon Splits, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 07:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:BASIX logo.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BASIX logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 14:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Etymology section in impedance article

Hi Pengo, I have made an argument on the article talk page for the removal of this section. I would appreciate your input on this given that you created the section.--DJIndica 22:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:IUCNv2.3 CD.svg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:IUCNv2.3 CD.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 04:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Conservation code

Hi Pengo - I have been referred to you regarding a suggestion that graphics for the Conservation Codes for Western Australian Flora be included in the taxobox. What do you think? Cygnis insignis 12:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Cheers. I'm seeking some other opinions, but it seems good to me. Cygnis insignis 14:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Shall we take it live and see what happens? Cygnis insignis 08:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pengo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pengo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 20:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hangon

Franklin dam - this is close to the problem with other issues - see my comments at lake pedder and the gunns pulp mill - please talk - there is one thing to reduce to what might seem the most obvious but... SatuSuro 23:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough - I have to get off - will try to explain later - sorry to be nuisance SatuSuro 00:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Anything to improve the articles on northern tasmania is the imperative - they need help - cheers SatuSuro 01:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Hazelwood

Since all the expansion and stuff has been going on I thought it might need to be updated. What about the new plant going to be built nearby? Does that have a page yet? by the way, check out this picture I took. Image:Hazelwoodpowerstationatnight.jpg Feel free to put it in the article somewhere --Simpsons fan 66 02:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Chubs and Disambiguation

Greetings. Recently, on Tue 16 Oct, I constructed a disambiguation page for the various fish known as chubs. After having done so, I began to contemplate whether that page and the current Chub page might be better named. I posted a discussion on the Chub page but it's not yet received any comment. I noticed from the article's revision history that you had made one or more contributions to the page. Consequently, I thought I might profit from your advice at Talk:Chub#Page title if you have a moment or two to spare. Thanks. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 03:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Melbourne Meetup

	Melbourne Meetup Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/46 - Tuesday 13 August, 2024 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hello! The Melburnians are having another meet-up! Please consult this page if you are interested to participate in the discussion! Thanks! Phgao 03:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Greetings

Greetings Peter. I'm glad that you were able to come along today; it was nice to meet you. There are some images here that perhaps may be of interest to you. :) Cheers, Sarah 14:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PTUA logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:PTUA logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Betacommandbot

I have unblocked this bot, you have my blessings to reblock if necessary or if there is an emerging consensus to do so. Cheers, east.718 at 23:19, November 26, 2007

Hello, Pengo. You have new messages at Ichobar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Merry Christmas

Wishing you the very best for the season - Guettarda 05:51, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Blue whale population

Hey there. I found your SVG and decided to play with it, turning it into some form of a poster or some-such. You can see the final version, remaining in the public domain, on deviantART. Thank you for the SVG graphical data; I doubt I would have come up with something like this without it already in the SVG format.

Kind regards and enjoy the festive season. Klepas (talk) 08:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Please fix your error

Hello can you fix your error on {{Resolved}} please. Remember to test the template in your sandbox, especially if it is protected please, because it means few users can fix it. Jackaranga (talk) 02:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, the mistake was that you were missing <noinclude> at the end of the template syntax before the documentation. Jackaranga (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Conservation Codes for Western Australian Flora

Hoy - when you get a moment, could you tell me where you are up to with the Conservation Codes for Western Australian Flora implementation? Ta, cygnis insignis 08:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Great, but you need to make a small fix to your edit: where

|P2=[[Image:Status DECF P1.svg|

... should be P2.svg et cetera. Here is the stub I created to test it; Verticordia insignis subsp. eomagis Cheers, cygnis insignis 07:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

It's neat, I will start rolling it out. In making the stub above, I started wondering about pages, categories, and redirects for the same - a la the Redlist. Any thoughts on that? cygnis insignis 08:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Superb Fairy-wren

Pengo,

I noticed that you recently changed the lead picture in the taxobox of Superb Fairy-wren to one that, IMO, is more blurry because the other one is a composite between two images. I personally do not see a problem with a compiled image, particularly when it was done to include both the male and female of a sexually dimorphic species and was wondering if that was in the MOS somewhere. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

MSW3 bot

Can you crank up a bot to add appropriate id numbers to all instances of the various MSW3 templates? The id numbers are contained in this 8.5 MB CSV file. See my talk page for more info. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Can you give me directions on how to do it myself? - UtherSRG (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Help in taxonomy

Hi, can I ask you to make a Tagalog version Image:Biological classification L Pengo.svg? We've reached a consensus regarding the translation of the taxonomic terms in the Tagalog Wikipedia. These terms are sourced in reliable Tagalog-English dictionaries, the translation is as follows:

• Life: buhay
• Domain: dominyo
• Kingdom: kaharian
• Phylum: kalapian or kalahian
• Class: klase
• Order: orden
• Family: pamilya
• Genus: sari
• Species: uri

If you have any questions please reply on my talkpage. Thank you.--Lenticel ^(talk) 08:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! wow that was fast. I'll go tell the tl wiki.--Lenticel ^(talk) 12:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Green Star logo.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Green Star logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Australia's Sustainable Seafood Guide.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Australia's Sustainable Seafood Guide.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Teletaxo

Hello Pengo, I'm Thanyakij (or Aqua) from Thai Wikipedia. I know that you are making the TeleTaxo. I'm just complete the new Intelli-TeleTaxo which can change the color follow the regnum and collapse un-important data so you can copy and change something to suit different conditions in En-Wiki's work. for a good example see เสือ and หลาวชะโอนทุ่ง. For more information, you can contact me at my user talk page. Enjoy your new taxobox. -- aIqCuEa • 04:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Arbitration Filed in the "Hacker" article

In accordance with clause (4) of the Arbitration Filing Procedure, you are hereby being notified that you have been mentioned as a contributing party to the article and you can make a statement.

You can find the claim, and make your statement here.

I am required to tell you this information I am the filing party for the arbitration claim.

Andrew81446 (talk) 06:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)