Jump to content

User talk:Orderinchaos/Archive 2008 01: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Darrenss (talk | contribs)
Potters House
Line 49: Line 49:


If you have any spare time could you offer some helpful advice, since there is potential for the same user to create branch articles all over the place. Thanks heaps.[[User:Darrenss|Darrenss]] 11:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
If you have any spare time could you offer some helpful advice, since there is potential for the same user to create branch articles all over the place. Thanks heaps.[[User:Darrenss|Darrenss]] 11:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The truth is that my page got deleted while I was away. It is almost impossible to re-establish the user name I once had. Darren seems to think I was banned, but my page was deleted because I put links on the page, just as he has done. Darren is a former Potter's House member. If you look at his history you will see that HE is the one harrassing. He is only on Wikipedia to harras Potter's House members and to slander the church, as his history clearly shows.
He claims I am vandalising his page. I was just deleting the poor quality/slanderous links he has been warned of puting on wiki. I can't understand why my userpage was deleted, while his is not, he has links on his page as well. His slandrous links go to groups claiming that I am a homosexual, have left the church, and desire to have sex with the church leaders. They have made slanderous films on You Tube about me also. Just Type in Nick Sayers. So Although I was banned if you look at my contribs, I was actually contrinbuting to wiki not just cutting people down, putting up stupid links and deleting the hard work of others like Darren Smith does.
Nick.

Revision as of 12:43, 19 July 2007

   User Page        Userboxes        Barnstars        Projects        Talk Page      

Now back from my wanderings, but busy - 800+ photos to sort and a range of offline housekeeping. If you require administrator intervention, raising a case at WP:AN/I would alert admins - if it's Australia-related, WP:AWNB. - A.

Archives

Article Notability

I put up this article on Oscar (Pet Rock) thats planned to be traded up for a vehicle for kids with special medical needs. It's received wide publicity here in Queensland, but not sure about the rest of Australia. It's a similar idea to one red paperclip and so has received media interest in Canada also (where the idea first started) because of that. Maybe the article is pre-mature, as it now has a borderline notability tag. It is a unusual type of article, but it does have some importance, specially with the publicity its been receiving. Let me know your thoughts, otherwise it may as well be deleted for being too trival. Boylo 10:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Lake Macquarie

Hi OIC - thanks for the notice. I myself nominated this Project for deletion about a year ago but the nomination resulted in the WikiProject being kept mainly because of the list of suburbs, etc. contained within the project pages. While I have no problems with this being deleted, I would like to see a WikiProject on the Hunter region created, especially as Newcastle is the second-largest city in Australia that is not a capital city, but I'm happy to create that in the future from scratch if need be. However, before deleting this I think you should ask the Newcastle meetup crew (personal talk page messages might be the best way to go) and others who have expressed interest in Newcastle-related issues on that page, who may have an opinion about expanding the project or having it deleted. A WikiProject New South Wales is an excellent idea, though, and may spur non-Sydney editors to do some work on articles outside the Sydney region. JRG 10:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your support and note. When you get your plant photos uploaded, drop me a line, and I'll have a got at the IDs (besides I get to see WA flora without spending a fortune on airfares :) ) --Melburnian 01:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

View comments

I hope you can take your time in viewing my comments here Your opinion in this will be helpful. --Siva1979Talk to me 08:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Census template

you certainly lived up to your name this morning! Alec ﹌ ۞ 23:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed

It's not the sort of diff one would like to see quoted in some RfC down the track. :| Orderinchaos 04:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, if I had noticed the one above, I'd have removed that too. Hesperian 04:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potters House

Hi there, I noticed you had some previous contact with Potters House related articles. I've been working on trying to improve the main however in my wonderings I found several or more other Potters House articles basically they have been in groups such as leader/church/fellowship. Anyhow I'm currently discussing the deletion of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potters_House_Christian_Centre_Walthamstow since this offers no new information than that of what the main can explain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potter%27s_House_Christian_Fellowship

If you have any spare time could you offer some helpful advice, since there is potential for the same user to create branch articles all over the place. Thanks heaps.Darrenss 11:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The truth is that my page got deleted while I was away. It is almost impossible to re-establish the user name I once had. Darren seems to think I was banned, but my page was deleted because I put links on the page, just as he has done. Darren is a former Potter's House member. If you look at his history you will see that HE is the one harrassing. He is only on Wikipedia to harras Potter's House members and to slander the church, as his history clearly shows. He claims I am vandalising his page. I was just deleting the poor quality/slanderous links he has been warned of puting on wiki. I can't understand why my userpage was deleted, while his is not, he has links on his page as well. His slandrous links go to groups claiming that I am a homosexual, have left the church, and desire to have sex with the church leaders. They have made slanderous films on You Tube about me also. Just Type in Nick Sayers. So Although I was banned if you look at my contribs, I was actually contrinbuting to wiki not just cutting people down, putting up stupid links and deleting the hard work of others like Darren Smith does. Nick.