User talk:Oncamera: Difference between revisions
CaroleHenson (talk | contribs) →Please see Teahouse about Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill: new section |
CaroleHenson (talk | contribs) →Please see Teahouse about Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill: comment - next step I am taking - how to address "not a Mohawk" Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
Please see [[Wikipedia:Teahouse#New_rules_to_question_reliable_sources?]]–[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 07:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC) |
Please see [[Wikipedia:Teahouse#New_rules_to_question_reliable_sources?]]–[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 07:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:Can you give me some time to continue working on the tone issue. I removed all the remaining uncited content that I hadn't found in sources. |
|||
:And to work on Cullen's comments from Teahouse. Thanks! |
|||
:It looks like we might come closer by removing content + having some sort of source for her not being Mohawk. I will take the "known for" part out of the infobox.–[[User:CaroleHenson|CaroleHenson]] ([[User talk:CaroleHenson|talk]]) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:19, 15 May 2024
Archived talkpages
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4
A barnstar for you, don't cha know!
The Minnesota Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your Minnesota (and indigenous community)-related contributions! = paul2520 💬 23:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for all the contributions you make to Indigenous topics here on Wiki. They make a positive impact! Yuchitown (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC) |
Minneapolis
Hi, Oncamera. Do you have time to look over the section "Dakota homeland, city founded" under History in Minneapolis? It is so rare to have anyone show interest in the article. I had this section in a sandbox and it can use your help. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- P.S. This is the FAR underway. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bdóte has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)DYK for Bdóte
On 9 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bdóte, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bdóte, an area of sacred significance to the Dakota people, centered on the confluence of the Minnesota and Mississippi rivers, was also the site of their forced exile from Minnesota? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bdóte. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bdóte), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Native Americans in the United States
Hello, Oncamera. May I ask why you reverted my edit to Native Americans in the United States? Personally, I wouldn't have phrased the header as such, but I believe it would be "Africans and Native Americans have interacted for centuries. " and not "African and Native Americans have interacted for centuries. ", which would imply a single person from Africa has interacted with Native Americans for centuries. I'm sure this was in good faith, but I would appreciate an explanation. Best regards, UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Rereading the sentence, it's possible that the implied explanation is that it means "African Americans and Native Americans have interacted for centuries." Due to English being weird, both are correct, my apologies. UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the sentence is meant to be read as shortening African Americans and Native Americans. Perhaps it can be written clearer and just put "African Americans and Native Americans" or "African- and Native-Americans". But grammatically, the Americans is pluralized and not African or Native in either case. oncamera (talk page) 20:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, just confused on MOS. I'll add your suggestion. Best regards, UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the sentence is meant to be read as shortening African Americans and Native Americans. Perhaps it can be written clearer and just put "African Americans and Native Americans" or "African- and Native-Americans". But grammatically, the Americans is pluralized and not African or Native in either case. oncamera (talk page) 20:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Minneapolis
Hi Oncamera, Thanks for letting me know about adding the citations. But, I'm little confused with what can be the valid citations that can be linked with the data. I have found related WIKI articles to the statements that I have added, will that be fine to go ahead add those WIKI's or let me know your inputs in this regard. Suchithra moolinti (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Suchithra moolinti: No, you need to add sources to your statements. See Help:Referencing for beginners. Otherwise, add your updates to the talk page with sources and editors will look at what you want to add. Because this is a featured class article undergoing review, your edits will be scrutinized and likely removed or highly edited. It might be better to focus your first edits on a different article. oncamera (talk page) 18:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hunter Biden on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hayes Barnard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –CaroleHenson (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please see Teahouse about Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill
Please see Wikipedia:Teahouse#New_rules_to_question_reliable_sources?–CaroleHenson (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you give me some time to continue working on the tone issue. I removed all the remaining uncited content that I hadn't found in sources.
- And to work on Cullen's comments from Teahouse. Thanks!
- It looks like we might come closer by removing content + having some sort of source for her not being Mohawk. I will take the "known for" part out of the infobox.–CaroleHenson (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)