Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:22, 10 October 2022

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruth Bader Ginsburg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, Index, 1: 90 days

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government GA‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law GA‑class High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state): Columbia University GA‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City GA‑class Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States courts and judges GA‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Jewish Women GA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Vital article

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 18, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 23, 2017	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
June 17, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 15, 2017.
Current status: Good article

A news item involving Ruth Bader Ginsburg was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 19 September 2020.

Wikipedia

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 11,884,007 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Military spouse

I reverted this mention as there is no source provided that being a "former military spouse" is particularly notable in the context of her appointment to SCOTUS. (Her husband was a reservist and was called up for what appears to be at most 2 years of service very early in their marriage.) A related discussion is at Talk:Sandra_Day_O'Connor#Military_spouse. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. As the Supreme Court Historical Society has stated, veterans are important in the Supreme Court because military service "provides a special perspectiveon the intersecting powers of the federal government," and "Justices who have served in the armed forces prior to serving on the Court have additional practical experience in how those powers function.” Again, you have not proven how that is not significant or unique, as is your burden.

Indeed, the Supreme Court itself tracks how many of its members have served in the military.

Further, at least one peer-reviewed academic article has discussed how military service impacts the Supreme Court justice's perspectives while on the Court. See, e.g., Diane Marie Amann, John Paul Stevens, Human Rights Judge, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 1569, 1599 (2006). Specifically with reference to their thoughts on capital punishment. Another article discussed "how military service may have influenced Justice Stevens's decision-making process." Eugene R. Fidell, Justice John Paul Stevens and Judicial Deference in Military Matters, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 999, 1010 (2010). There is no shortage of decades of articles discussing the impact of military service on Supreme Court justices.

And one legal blogs specifically mentions Ginsburg's service as relevant.

Those who has brought up this topic has a personal distaste for military service members and has been trying to erase the military from multiple wiki pages. For example, 1, 2, 3. AnubisIbizu (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg&type=revision&diff=1115241896&oldid=1115220386&diffmode=source reverted] this mention as there is no source provided that being a "former military spouse" is particularly notable in the context of her appointment to SCOTUS. (Her husband was a reservist and was called up for [[Martin_D._Ginsburg |what appears to be]] at most 2 years of service very early in their marriage.) A related discussion is at [[Talk:Sandra_Day_O%27Connor#Military_spouse]]. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|<span style="color:black">Zim</span><b style="color:darkgreen">Zala</b><span style="color:black">Bim</span>]] <sup style="color:black">[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</sup> 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
+:Incorrect. As the Supreme Court Historical Society has stated, veterans are important in the Supreme Court because military service "[https://supremecourthistory.org/scotus-scoops/in-celebration-of-armed-forces-day/ provides a special perspective]on the intersecting powers of the federal government," and "Justices who have served in the armed forces prior to serving on the Court have [https://supremecourthistory.org/scotus-scoops/in-celebration-of-armed-forces-day/ additional practical experience] in how those powers function.” Again, you have not proven how that is not significant or unique, as is your burden.
+:Indeed, the Supreme Court itself tracks how many of its members have served in the military.
+:Further, at least one peer-reviewed academic article has discussed how military service impacts the Supreme Court justice's perspectives while on the Court. See, e.g., Diane Marie Amann, ''John Paul Stevens,'' ''Human Rights Judge'', 74 Fordham L. Rev. 1569, 1599 (2006). Specifically with reference to their thoughts on capital punishment. Another article discussed "how military service may have influenced Justice Stevens's decision-making process." Eugene R. Fidell, ''Justice John Paul Stevens and Judicial Deference in Military Matters'', 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 999, 1010 (2010). There is no shortage of decades of articles discussing the impact of military service on Supreme Court justices.
+:And one [https://abovethelaw.com/2014/11/honoring-the-veterans-of-the-supreme-court/ legal blogs] specifically mentions Ginsburg's service as relevant.
+:Those who has brought up this topic has a personal distaste for military service members and has been trying to erase the military from multiple wiki pages. For example, [[Talk:Veteran|1]], [[Talk:Sandra Day O'Connor|2]], [[Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg|3]]. [[User:AnubisIbizu|AnubisIbizu]] ([[User talk:AnubisIbizu|talk]]) 15:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)