Jump to content

User talk:MrsSnoozyTurtle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Violations of WP:DRAFTIFY: habit of removing past warnings makes it difficult
Line 29: Line 29:


* Hello {{u|David Eppstein}}. Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of that part of the guideline. [[User:MrsSnoozyTurtle|''MrsSnoozyTurtle'']] 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
* Hello {{u|David Eppstein}}. Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of that part of the guideline. [[User:MrsSnoozyTurtle|''MrsSnoozyTurtle'']] 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
**It is difficult to tell what you might be aware of because of your habit of removing past warnings to pay more attention to the draftification guidelines such as the one at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MrsSnoozyTurtle&oldid=1065737535]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 00:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:05, 26 February 2022

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Violations of WP:DRAFTIFY

According to WP:DRAFTOBJECT, A page may only be moved unilaterally to the draftspace a single time. You moved Gerceida E. Adams-Jones to draft space twice, on December 26 and again on January 14. Both moves were bad: Adams-Jones very obviously passes WP:PROF#C3, as a fellow of a major academic society, and the article has already been cleaned up by established editors. Please stop your disruptive edits and violation of established procedures. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]