Talk:CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:23, 24 September 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 24, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 18, 2014	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 3, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
March 31, 2019	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Chinese / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A GA reassessment needed?

Today I've checked three cited links, and I found that in all the editor did some form or other form of manipulation, including misquoting the source, providing technical details widely different from the cited source etc. There maybe many more, either this article need a reassessment (I don't favour this option) or someone should step in and correct it. Thank you - --FoxtAl (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this article it is stated that jf17 reportedly missed the intended targets in 2019 airstrikes against india it is completely wrong and misquoted, the fact is that Pakistani authorities illustrated through presentation and satellite images that they intentionally missed the targets just to give the message that we are capable but we don't want escalation in the situation. Their targets were just in 2 meters of indian military installations and ammunition depots which were successfully hit by Pakistan air force jf17 thunders to show capability but not to escalate DoctorKhan304 (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

@Satrar: Hai, Good day. Let's come to the point, what was you rationale in removing this [1] cited content? —Echo1Charlie (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 * [[commons:File:JF 17B.jpg|JF 17B.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2021-09-03T03:23:30.793286 | JF 17B.jpg -->
 You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 03:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
+== September 2021 ==
+{{ping|Satrar}} Hai, Good day. Let's come to the point, what was you rationale in removing this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CAC/PAC_JF-17_Thunder&diff=0&oldid=1046132979] cited content? —[[User:Echo1Charlie|Echo1Charlie]] ([[User talk:Echo1Charlie|talk]]) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)