Jump to content

User talk:Ali banu sistani: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Revenge revert: new section
Line 85: Line 85:


I understand the Wikipedia rule very well, but I did not understand your inconsistency, and in the rodebo my edits, as usual, do not violate the rights, but I will have to file a complaint against you !!! [[User:Ali banu sistani|Ali banu sistani]] ([[User talk:Ali banu sistani#top|talk]]) 20:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I understand the Wikipedia rule very well, but I did not understand your inconsistency, and in the rodebo my edits, as usual, do not violate the rights, but I will have to file a complaint against you !!! [[User:Ali banu sistani|Ali banu sistani]] ([[User talk:Ali banu sistani#top|talk]]) 20:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

== Revenge revert ==

You've already been told to behave appropriately in the past. Next time you do stuff like this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Iranian_Azerbaijanis&oldid=prev&diff=1015615718] you will be reported. Consider this a warning. --[[User:HistoryofIran|HistoryofIran]] ([[User talk:HistoryofIran|talk]]) 17:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:43, 2 April 2021

January 2021

Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Baloch people because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it is very good that you are discussing with me as an adult, I did not insult you, but I did not understand the word "wha?" (what?). You are rolling back my legal edits and spreading false information yourself

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1004261330


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baloch_people#Please_protect_the_Baloch_people_page

I know the principle of Wikipedia very well, and I also know that Wikipedia was not created by supporters of the Iranian regime, you demanded a source from me (proof of the same fact).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1001209416

I added the source but you rolled back anyway Why?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1001220888


There are alternative explanations for this: you get paid and you just do your job, guarding articles day and night that are in the interests of Persian nationalists. Do what you want, but do not break the rules of Wikipedia, do not spread such false information

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/989576032

your actions suggest that you just want to destroy Baloch history! don't do it please... Ali banu sistani (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Ali banu sistani, you must immediately cease from speculating about other editors' motivations —especially about them being paid for editing!— including their national origins or political allegiances. That is completely unacceptable. Any further violations of that nature are likely to be met by sanctions. Thank you. El_C 14:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that you paid attention, but you attacked the wrong one, pay attention to my answer Historyofiran I just ask them not to spread false information, please do not pass by. Regarding my answer that they are paid for this, I myself admitted that these are alternatives, you understand that. All contributors have the right to file a complaint against large contributors if it is correct! This is the Wikipedia principle! Ali banu sistani (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Negative, Ali banu sistani. As I made clear to you above, even making that as a speculation, an "alternative," or otherwise hinting about it in any way whatsoever is strictly prohibited. On Wikipedia we consider that harassment. You need a detailed, comprehensive and coherent report, one which includes diff-evidence, to even ask for an investigation about that (which I highly doubt you'd be able to provide). I strongly advise you not to pursue that line of inquiry further. It's unlikely to go anywhere and probably just gonna cause you serious problems here. El_C 16:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kami2018. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Khanate of Kalat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not remove referenced information.Template:Z186 Kami2018 (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this is your edit

The Khanate of Kalat and the Genesis of [Baluch-] Brahvi Nationalism... 

And what did I see when opening the fifth link?

" The study portrays the decline and disintegration of the Baluch khanate of Kalat during the last decades of British rule, analyses Kalat's lack of integration but increasing attachment to British Indian affairs, and summarises the colonial legacy of Baluchistan in respect of political, administrative and constitutional development. "

You are not linites, open the link and see for yourself, and write my answer, I'm waiting! Ali banu sistani (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samandar Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mastung. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks i fixed! Ali banu sistani (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mehrab II of Kalat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmad Shah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Muslim battle of Jihad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Muslim battle of Jihad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khanate of Kalat; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the Wikipedia rule very well, but I did not understand your inconsistency, and in the rodebo my edits, as usual, do not violate the rights, but I will have to file a complaint against you !!! Ali banu sistani (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge revert

You've already been told to behave appropriately in the past. Next time you do stuff like this [1] you will be reported. Consider this a warning. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]