Wikipedia talk:List of policies and guidelines
 | The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
 | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, Wikipedia talk:List of policies redirects here. |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
"Changing this page does not change policy." Where are official policies published?
editThe header writes: "Changing this page does not change policy." So the possibility exists, the text on this page does not reflect the right policies. Edit request is, to link to a source where users can find the official text of the policies that do have official status. So users can go sure what rules they have to follow, to be in line with the Terms of Use. Thanks! WillTim 2001:16B8:8C13:FF01:196F:BE90:43F6:9FEA (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
TfDs - Guideline when it is closed
editI recently did myself no favors acting in a manner that some could call WP:IDHT, so after making amends and awaiting whatever punishment I deserve, I wish to ask a very important question: Should there be clearer guidelines about Template deletion for editors to rely upon? I know we got guidelines detailing the options for deletion for articles, but I wonder whether templates should have clearer guidelines, especially about nominating a template that already came out of a template deletion discussion with either "no consensus" or "keep". Like, should editors be advised not to nominate them again if they recently had been already. If I had found clearer guidelines, I think I would have saved a serious amount of headache for myself and others. GUtt01 (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Stalking - There Needs to Be a Policy Against This
editWikipedia editors shouldn’t be allowed to abuse the section that shows contributions to stalk an ip address or other users who edit on Wikipedia. I had made an edit similar to other Wikipedia pages and because another user decided they didn’t like my edit based on their personal opinion I went to a different page to make an edit, again similar to other pages and the user stalked me there through my contributions to revert any edits I make. That’s very creepy and abusive behavior to do to anyone and should not be allowed to be done as that can make people feel uncomfortable as it has me and that needs to be respected. 2601:806:8300:D0D0:A197:355A:8C2A:6569 (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Reverting problematic edits is not harassment, it's legitimate editing. You are entitled to disagree with your edit being reverted, and you should discuss this rationally on the Downton Abbey article talk page and hopefully work out a solution. Please see WP:BRD for an outline of how this works. Posting messages on a user's talk page accusing that person of "biased editing", "harassing" and "stalking" may, however, be seen as personal attacks, so you might want to tread more lightly here if you want to make any progress. Best of luck. Cnbrb (talk) 18:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)