Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional school

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Professional development. Vanamonde (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Professional school

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced arbitrary list Rathfelder (talk) 22:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Professional development which includes training for a profession, graduate schools, and also a hatnote to vocational school. Note that Professional education also goes to professional development. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Professional development. No need to lose the contents of this article in the process. bd2412 T 00:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What does this list provide which is not better provided by categorisation? Rathfelder (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It provides a list, so that if the reader is already reading this article, then they don't have to go look at a category page. Also, is there a category containing all of these items, and would it be appropriate to have one? bd2412 T 11:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A list is static. A category is more likely to be updated. Rathfelder (talk) 21:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to professional development. A professional school is an actual type of school and probably warrants a page. However, at this point a merge is probably the best option. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 17:31, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.