Wikipedia editor
Jerome Charles Potts
Name | This user wants his name to be confidential. | XXX |
666
|
This user has 6 letters in each of his three names.
|
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Crystal_Clear_app_kalarm.svg/40px-Crystal_Clear_app_kalarm.svg.png) | This user has too much time on their hands. |
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dd/Crystal_Clear_app_aim3.png/40px-Crystal_Clear_app_aim3.png) | This user has no understanding of time and does everything at the last minute. |
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Crystal_Clear_app_kalarm.svg/40px-Crystal_Clear_app_kalarm.svg.png) | This user loves deadlines. He loves the whooshing sound they make as they go by. |
|
The rest
|
Subj
|
This user prefers that the subjunctive mood be used. Were this user you, he would use it.
|
to too two | This user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two. |
its & it's | This user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you. |
their there they're | This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling! |
’s | Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice. |
A, B, and A and B | This user uses the serial comma unless its inclusion is confusing. |
Mix | This user has been influenced by too many dialects of English to use one orthography, vocabulary and grammar consistently. |
|
- I am a believer of Michel Potay's Revelation of Arès, and, accordingly, of theistic evolution.
- February 6, 2007: I just read, for the first time, the Iraqi insurgency page, and i am astonished by the lousiness of that article. And i'm not even a news junkie, far from it. I found copyright violation + a load of bullshit (unsubtantiated "information") which makes me think that the page is not monitored very well, and that to my great surprise.
...which follows by this rant:
Warning to the reader
edit
O reader, you should beware of what you read in here. How to sort it out ? Well, if an article has a good number of footnotes, themselves pointing to a bibliography, and the associated discussion page is interesting/impressive to read, then you can trust most of what you are finding (go have a look at WP:SOURCES). Otherwise, do your own homework. But don't be too disappointed, because what's in here helps you with that.
So, when you stumble across a web site which copies the Wikipedia entries regardless of quality, such as http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/, you should turn around and run the other way. Either those people are stupid, or they count on you to be stupid, to take advantage of you. I suspect it is both: they count on you to be stupid, to take advantage of you, and that is stupid.
End of warning to the reader
edit
- Oh, yeah, i forgot: "No soup for you!". One day i'll be him. ...et ma vengeance sera terrible!