Talk:Montenotte, Cork

Notability?

Re rv of prod: I couldn't find anything at Wikipedia:Notability that supports keeping this, especially an unsourced article that does not indicate any notability. Wikipedia:OUTCOMES#Places notes that these articles are usually deleted. -- Jeandré, 2008-01-18t13:49z

Sorry, but I can't see where Wikipedia:OUTCOMES#Places says that. It says "Larger neighborhoods are acceptable, but its name must have verifiable widespread usage". A quick Google search or Google Books search will verify that the name has widespread usage. If you want to discuss this further then the place to do it is at WP:AFD. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

This article should not be deleted, the suburb is often cited in Irish literature as representing a certain type of good-natured, middle-class conservatism. People coming upon these references will expect this encyclopedia to explain a little about the place. --Jaimehy (talk) 21:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

See wp:v. -- Jeandré, 2008-02-03t14:16z

Ronan O'Gara?

Ronan O'Gara grew up in Bishopstown, lived in Douglas while playing for Munster and now lives in Paris. I can't find any source associating him with Montenotte — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.240.197.233 (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montenotte, Cork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071119074603/http://www.corkpastandpresent.ie/history/1700-1900-19.shtml to http://www.corkpastandpresent.ie/history/1700-1900-19.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Why remove the list of people or the bus routes?

If it’s not allowed to list information pertinent to Montenotte why have the article at all?

The historical information is as irrelevant as the bus routes or people from the area. You might as well just delete the whole article and put up a map link! 84.203.2.134 (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi. In terms of:

• "List of people". What list of people? When was there a list of people? And when was it removed?
• "[List of] bus routes". I removed the bus routes, in this edit, because (as per the edit summary) it was uncited. (Wikipedia content must be supported by reliable verifable references; That content was not). My decision to remove was also influenced by the fact that it read/looked like a bus schedule/timetable (Wikipedia content ideally would not read like directory-style bus schedules or guides).
• "[Unless any/all content is added] You might as well just delete the whole article". This statement suggests a lack of understanding of what Wikipedia is about. Perhaps read those guidelines which confirm that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of any/all information. Or those essays which seek to summarise the policies on content relevance. In particular that relevance is determined by sourcing/coverage/verifiability.

In the meantime, please consider adding reliable and verifable references for the other content you have proposed to include. As much of that content remains problematic/tagged. Guliolopez (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)