This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
I agree with using "LGBTQI+" for this page since that's the term the UN uses. I do wonder if that would mean that other related pages should also be updated, since other pages commonly use "LGBT" and refers to "LGBTQI+" as a variation (like the LGBT main page). 23impartial (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
As stated by the Lead too long tag, the current lead section is too long with 11 paragraphs. In order to keep the lead's size consistent with the suggested length and summary style in MOS:LEADLENGTH, I suggest that we only keep the first and last paragraphs of the current lead and move the rest to a new History section. Happy to hear what fellow editors think. 23impartial (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply