Pteranodon sternbergi is an extinct species of the pteranodontid pterodactyloid pterosaur genus Pteranodon from the Late Cretaceous geological period of North America. P. sternbergi was among the largest pterosaurs, with a wingspan of up to 6 metres (20 ft) in males. It has been argued that P. sternbergi should be classified in a separate genus, Geosternbergia, but this has not been followed by most other researchers.

Pteranodon sternbergi
Temporal range:
Late Cretaceous, 88–80.5 Ma
Mounted female and male P. sternbergi skeletons at the Royal Ontario Museum
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Order: Pterosauria
Suborder: Pterodactyloidea
Family: Pteranodontidae
Genus: Pteranodon
Species:
P. sternbergi
Binomial name
Pteranodon sternbergi
Harksen, 1966
Synonyms
Genus synonymy
Synonyms of G. sternbergi
  • Pteranodon sternbergi
    Harksen, 1966
  • Pteranodon (Geosternbergia) sternbergi
    (Harksen, 1966)
  • Pteranodon (Sternbergia) sternbergi
    (Harksen, 1966)
  • Pteranodon eatoni
    Miller, 1972
  • Pteranodon (Occidentalia) eatoni
    (Miller, 1972)
  • Dawndraco kanzai?
    Kellner, 2010
  • Geosternbergia maysei?
    Kellner, 2010

Discovery and history

edit

The first fossils of Pteranodon sternbergi were collected by American paleontologist George F. Sternberg in 1952 from the lower portion of the Niobrara Formation. The fossils of the animal looked similar to those of the species Pteranodon longiceps, but the crests were set upright and in a slightly different position. In 1958, Sternberg and paleontologist Myrl V. Walker published a study about this peculiar find.[1] In 1966, American paleontologist John Christian Harksen assigned the specimens found as a new species of Pteranodon called P. sternbergi due to its distinct upright crest that set it apart from P. longiceps. Halsey W. Miller however, concluded a revision of the different species of Pteranodon in 1971, and created three different subgenera. One of which was Sternbergia, which consisted of the Pteranodon specimens with upright crests. P. sternbergi was assigned to this subgenus along with another species called P. walkeri, but Miller then found out that the name Sternbergia had been preoccupied, so he changed it into Geosternbergia instead.[2] Paleontologists like S. Christopher Bennett consider P. sternbergi to be older than P. longiceps, and therefore the direct ancestor of that species.[3]

 
Specimen UALVP 24238 with reconstructed crest; the specimen has also been assigned as the holotype of disputed genus Dawndraco kanzai

The most complete example of the species, currently in the collections of the University of Alberta Laboratory for Vertebrate Paleontology as specimen number UALVP 24238, is a partially-articulated sub-adult fossil with a wingspan of about 4 meters (13 ft). The skeleton is missing only parts of the skull and the ends of the wings and feet, was discovered in 1974 near Utica, Kansas. The fossil was found by Richard C. Fox and Allen Lindoe in rocks belonging to the lower part of the Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Formation. These rocks date to the late Coniacian or early Santonian stage, about 86 million years ago. In 2010, a paper by Alexander W.A. Kellner argued that this specimen was different enough from G. sternbegi that it should be re-classified as its own genus and species, which he named Dawndraco kanzai. This generic name combined the Dawn deity of the Iroquois with a Latin draco, "dragon". The specific name refers to the Kanza tribe of Kansas.[4] Kellner thought that several features of the skeleton supported his hypothesis that D. kanzai was a unique species, most notably its unique snout, which does not strongly taper towards the tip as in female Pteranodon specimens, with the upper and lower margins running almost parallel instead. Kellner thought this meant the specimen must have had a crest running along the length of the snout. However, a re-examination of the fossil published in 2017 by Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone and colleagues argued that the differences in the snout were more likely due to male pteranodontids having longer, broader bills than the more complete female specimens Kellner used for comparison. Martin-Silverstone concluded that "Dawndraco" was simply a male P. sternbergi with a very long bill with a gradual taper.[5]

P. sternbergi fossils are known from the Niobrara and Sharon Springs Formations of the central United States. Geosternbergia existed as a group for more than four million years during the late Coniacian – early Campanian stages of the Cretaceous period.[3] The genus is present in the lower the Niobrarra Formation except for the upper two; in 2003, Kenneth Carpenter surveyed the distribution and dating of fossils in this formation, demonstrating that Pteranodon sternbergi existed there from 88 to 85 million years ago, while the species later named G. maiseyi existed between 81.5 and 80.5 million years ago.[6]

Description

edit

Size

edit
 
Size of P. sternbergi male (green) and female (orange) compared with a human

Pteranodon sternbergi was among the largest pterosaurs, with the wingspan of most adults ranging between 3 and 6 meters (9.8 and 19.7 ft). No complete skulls of adult males have been found, but a nearly complete lower jaw has been estimated at 1.25 meters (4.1 ft) long.[7] While most specimens are found crushed, enough fossils exist to put together a detailed description of the animal. P. sternbergi differs from its close relative Pteranodon longiceps mainly due to its earlier time period and broader, more upright crest.[5]

Skull and beak

edit

The upright cranial crest of P. sternbergi is its distinctive characteristic. These crests consisted of skull bones (frontals) projecting upward and backward from the skull. The size and shape of these crests varied due to a number of factors, including age, sex, and species. Male P. sternbergi, the older species of the two described to date, had a larger vertical crest with a broad forward projection, while G. maiseyi had a short, rounded vertical crest and was generally smaller.[4] Females of both species were smaller and bore small, rounded crests.[3] The crests were probably mainly display structures, though they may have had other functions as well.[8]

Unlike the earlier pterosaurs, such as the rhamphorhynchids and the pterodactylids, P. sternbergi had a toothless beak that was made of solid, bony margins that projected from the base of the jaws, similar to modern-day birds. The structure of the beaks were long, slender, and ended in thin, sharp points. Its maxilla was also found to be longer than the mandible, and was curved upward.

Classification

edit
 
Restoration of a male P. sternbergi
 
Reconstruction of a female P. sternbergi skeleton (specimen NMC41-358), with a small crest

Pteranodon sternbergi is one of the two widely recognized species of Pteranodon. Alexander Kellner has argued that Pteranodon sternbergi should be classified in a separate genus, Geosternbergia,[4] but other pterosaur researchers have regarded this split as unwarranted and continued to classify it as a species of Pteranodon.[5][9] Kellner also classified a specimen previously identified as Pteranodon longiceps as a second species of Geosternbergia, G. maiseyi.[4]

Below is a cladogram showing the phylogenetic placement of this species within Pteranodontia from Andres and Myers (2013).[10]

 Pteranodontia 

Both species previously referred to Geosternbergia were separately included as those of Pteranodon (P. sternbergi and P. maiseyi) based on phylogenetic analysis in 2024.[11]

Paleobiology

edit

Sexual variation

edit
 
Variations in cranial anatomy by sex, age, and species (left, drawn to scale)

Adult P. sternbergi specimens may be divided into two distinct size classes, small and large, with the large size class being about one and a half times larger than the small, and the small being twice as common as the large. Both size classes lived alongside each other, and while researchers had previously suggested that they represent different species, Christopher Bennett showed that the differences between them are consistent with the concept that they represent females and males, and that P. sternbergi was sexually dimorphic. Skulls from the larger size class preserve large, upward and backward pointing crests, while the crests of the smaller size class are small and triangular. Some larger skulls also show evidence of a second crest that extended long and low, toward the tip of the beak, which is not seen in smaller specimens.[8]

The gender of the different size classes was determined, not from the skulls, but from the pelvic bones. Contrary to what may be expected, the smaller size class had disproportionately large and wide-set pelvic bones. Bennett interpreted this as indicating a more spacious birth canal, through which eggs would pass. He concluded that the small size class with small, triangular crests represent females, and the larger, large-crested specimens represent males.[8]

Note that the overall size and crest size also corresponds to age. Immature specimens are known from both females and males, and immature males often have small crests similar to adult females. Therefore, it seems that the large crests only developed in males when they reached their large, adult size, making the gender of immature specimens difficult to establish from partial remains.[12]

The fact that females appear to have outnumbered males two to one suggests that, as with modern animals with size-related sexual dimorphism, such as sea lions and other pinnipeds, P. sternbergi might have been polygynous, with a few males competing for association with groups consisting of large numbers of females. Similar to modern pinnipeds, P. sternbergi may have competed to establish territory on rocky, offshore rookeries, with the largest, and largest-crested, males gaining the most territory and having more success mating with females. The crests of male P. sternbergi would not have been used in competition, but rather as "visual dominance-rank symbols", with display rituals taking the place of physical competition with other males. If this hypothesis is correct, it also is likely that male P. sternbergi played little to no part in rearing the young; such a behavior is not found in the males of modern polygynous animals who father many offspring at the same time.[8]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Sternberg, G. F.; Walker, M. V. (1958). "Observation of articulated limb bones of a recently discovered Pteranodon in the Niobrara Cretaceous of Kansas". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 61 (1): 81–85. doi:10.2307/3626742. JSTOR 3626742.
  2. ^ Miller, H. W. (1971). "A skull of Pteranodon (Longicepia) longiceps Marsh associated with wing and body parts". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 74 (10): 20–33. doi:10.2307/3627664. JSTOR 3627664.
  3. ^ a b c Bennett, S.C. (1994). "Taxonomy and systematics of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloida)". Occasional Papers of the Natural History Museum, University of Kansas. 169: 1–70.
  4. ^ a b c d Kellner, A.W.A. (2010). "Comments on the Pteranodontidae (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea) with the description of two new species" (PDF). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 82 (4): 1063–1084. doi:10.1590/S0001-37652010000400025. PMID 21152777.
  5. ^ a b c Martin-Silverstone E., Glasier J., Acorn J., Mohr S., Currie P. (2017). "Reassesment [sic] of Dawndraco kanzai Kellner, 2010 and reassignment of the type specimen to Pteranodon sternbergi Harksen, 1966". Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology. 3: 47–59. doi:10.18435/B5059J.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ Carpenter K (2003). "Vertebrate Biostratigraphy of the Smoky Hill Chalk (Niobrara Formation) and the Sharon Springs Member (Pierre Shale)". High-Resolution Approaches in Stratigraphic Paleontology. Topics in Geobiology. 21: 421–437. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9053-0. ISBN 978-1-4020-1443-7.
  7. ^ Zimmerman, H., Preiss, B., and Sovak, J. (2001). Beyond the Dinosaurs!: sky dragons, sea monsters, mega-mammals, and other prehistoric beasts, Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-689-84113-2.
  8. ^ a b c d Bennett, S.C. (1992). "Sexual dimorphism of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs, with comments on cranial crests". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 12 (4): 422–434. doi:10.1080/02724634.1992.10011472.
  9. ^ Hone, David W.E.; Witton, Mark P.; Habib, Michael B. (December 14, 2018). "Evidence for the Cretaceous shark Cretoxyrhina mantelli feeding on the pterosaur Pteranodon from the Niobrara Formation". PeerJ. 6: –6031. doi:10.7717/peerj.6031. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 6296329. PMID 30581660.
  10. ^ Andres, B.; Myers, T. S. (2013). "Lone Star Pterosaurs". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 103 (3–4): 383–398. doi:10.1017/S1755691013000303. S2CID 84617119.
  11. ^ Pêgas, Rodrigo V. (June 10, 2024). "A taxonomic note on the tapejarid pterosaurs from the Pterosaur Graveyard site (Caiuá Group, ?Early Cretaceous of Southern Brazil): evidence for the presence of two species". Historical Biology: 1–22. doi:10.1080/08912963.2024.2355664. ISSN 0891-2963.
  12. ^ Bennett, S.C. (2001). "The osteology and functional morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon. General description of osteology". Palaeontographica, Abteilung A. 260: 1–112. doi:10.1127/pala/260/2001/1. S2CID 90380603.