Significa liberdade

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Significa liberdade! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:55, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

The red link has left me no peace

Do you remember general director Julius Koritschoner?
Would you like to take a look at my next rough draft? Emil Kahane
My head is spinning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Emil_Kahane --Virtualiter (talk) 21:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Virtualiter -- Thank you for reaching out for help! At present, I'm having trouble sorting through the Emil Kahane draft to understand his importance. It's worth noting that you can also create drafts in the draft space or in your sandbox. There, you can work on an article without it needing to meet various Wikipedia standards. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

• ".. but may read better as prose"[1] No! The list format is clearer for understanding the Hine collection.
• Would my next attempt to son Karl[2] be sufficiently relavant? --Virtualiter (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  Hi, @Virtualiter: I can agree that some of the information may be better in list format. However, it's not clear to me what the current list means. Does "oo" indicate this was one of Koritschoner's wives? If so, there is an error somewhere, given that sources say he only had three wives, not four. Additionally, citations are needed. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  As for the article for Karl: The focus of the Wikipedia article should be on the person the article is about. At present, most of this article is about the family, which doesn't establish why Karl himself is notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  In EN:WP i coudn't find this small symbol: ⚭ for marriage

  I'm convinced that Emil is much more important than his son Karl - even if I can't explain how a clerc can buy half a public limited company and then get it back after losing it. But Karl enjoyed more political prominence. --Virtualiter (talk) 15:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you for clarifying about the marriage symbol. This still raises the question regarding verification. At least two sources indicate Julius had 3 wives, but at present, the family section of the article shows that he had 4 wives without providing citations. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  Herwig Hartner-Hnizdo may have lost track of the 3 marriages mentioned. (geni.com says Else was Mother of Franz Karl Koritschoner and Hans Friedrich Koritschoner https://www.geni.com/people/Else-Koritschoner/6000000017658016357 But that doesn't pass as a source here). What reliable source can we find? --Virtualiter (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

  @Virtualiter: Geni itself is not a reliable source because it is user generated. However, if there are any documents included on Geni (e.g., newspaper articles, census statements, etc.), those sources may be reliable. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

[3] Are you typing all this yourself? Hopefully you realize that the source code becomes uneditable with something like that. --Virtualiter (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Virtualiter: I did not type all that myself. I used a tool called ReFill. Can you explain how the source code became uneditable? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Yes, take a look at this. Because of all the table formatting in the source text, you can no longer see where the story continues. 1166 Bytes is an halfe article!! --Virtualiter (talk) 10:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

@Virtualiter: It looks like the "book" cited there is a collection of essays. Do you know which essay you were citing? If so, the list of authors could be shorter. I tried searching the book for some of the information in the cited sentence but couldn't find the exact essay. Also, it may be helpful to edit using the Visual Editor -- at least sometimes -- to get around cumbersome citations. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

The article from Raymond Bardeen Ladoo[4]. Serial No. 2142 (as single essay). How could ReFill read the name? But shouldn't it be enough to just give Google Books the page number? --Virtualiter (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

@Virtualiter: Reference updated. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Well, I think I've run out of ideas. Would you like to take another look? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Eduard_Elbogen --Virtualiter (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Significa liberdade ? --Virtualiter (talk) 18:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Virtualiter: I'll add it to my to-do list, but I can't promise I'll get to it quickly. I have a lot of work on my plate right now and am using Wikipedia mostly to relax when I have time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Significa liberdade

I don't want to be annoying, but I'll soon be disappearing into the archives. --Virtualiter (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Virtualiter: Thanks for touching base. At this point, the article is beyond my expertise. I would recommend submitting for review to receive feedback from other editors. :) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Coloniality of being

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Coloniality of being".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Balalin Theater Troupe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balalin Theater Troupe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balalin Theater Troupe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Review of my articles

Hi, I'm an inexperienced Wikipedian and I saw you just reviewed a bunch of my redirects. Thank you for taking an interest in articles I created. DarthCloakedGuy (talk) 05:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome, @DarthCloakedGuy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy it here! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Meeting science

Hey Significa liberdade, thank you so much for your help with the meeting science article. Many of the «  citation needed » tags are in the further reading. How can I quote those books in the paragraphs? Lasourisrose (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Lasourisrose! Thanks for asking. If the information can be verified by a source, you should include that in a citation even if you do not include a quote. The main purposes of a citation are to 1) tell people where the information came from (i.e., you aren't just making it up) and 2) tell people where they can go to find more information. For more information, I recommend checking out Wikipedia's guide to citing sources and/or "Referencing for Beginners". I hope this helps! Let me know if you have further questions. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Authoring Autism

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Authoring Autism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Recent BLPPROD of a band

BLPPRODs do not apply to bands, see this discussion. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 17:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, @Mwwv! I had questioned whether a band would be considered a BLP in this case and got a different response elsewhere. Good to know! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afternoon Men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duckworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kathy Hytten

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kathy Hytten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Novels and WP:BOOKS

I've noticed you add WP:BOOKS banners to articles on fiction books; the scope of the project is explicitly "coverage of non-fiction books on Wikipedia." Considering that I actively remove WP:BOOKS from fiction articles, I feel like we may be running in circles. Could you stop adding them to fiction articles, or if I am inaccurate about the scope could we have a wider discussion about this? PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, @PARAKANYAA! I had just started doing this a few days ago (I believe), so I can certainly stop! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

No worries, it's just the distinction between WP BOOKS and WP NOVELS is very useful to my personal workflow and I felt us simultaneously doing the opposite thing was maybe counterproductive haha. Thank you for all your work on book articles! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @PARAKANYAA! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

PARAKANYAA: Also... I see you've already been invited to join the New Page Patrol but haven't requested permissions. We would love it if you could come join us! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I requested perms for that a long time ago, before I was appropriately qualified, I'd say, but I haven't gotten around to reapplying yet now that I am more qualified. I will likely request sometime, thank you for the reminder! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Betty Griffin Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betty Griffin Center, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Griffin Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Laura Rendón

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Laura Rendón".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Chapman

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Chapman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E'en So, Lord Jesus, Quickly Come, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Handball Euro articles

What is your problem with the 2030/32 men's and women's EHF Euro articles? They meet all requirements and in the past, these were already created after the bids were announced. I put these articles in my sandbox for future use so you will always have a problem with it. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you provide a link to the articles, ILoveSport2006? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

2032 European Women's Handball Championship, 2030 European Women's Handball Championship, 2030 European Men's Handball Championship, 2032 European Men's Handball Championship. All deleted even though they meet requirements. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@ILoveSport2006: These pages were recreated following a deletion discussion, primarily because it's too soon to create the article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2032 European Women's Handball Championship, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2030 European Women's Handball Championship, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2030 European Men's Handball Championship, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2032 European Men's Handball Championship. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

That is not what I'm asking. That was back in January. Back then, no official bids were confirmed but in June 2024, the official bids came out and thus, I brought the articles back. So why are they being deleted now? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Explicit, Theleekycauldron, Liz: Would you like to provide input on this since you officially deleted the articles? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Again, that's not what I am asking. Why did have they been deleted again now? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 23:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade @Explicit @Theleekycauldron @Liz Can I have a response? It's has been three days people. Why were my pages deleted when at the same stage of the bidding process in the past (back in 2021 for the 2026/2028 EHF Euro), the articles were already created and validated. So am I not allowed a response from people who probably don't even know what articles I am talking about and or remember that they deleted them? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 21:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I s'pose they're not "substantially identical" if they've passed the bidding stage, although I don't think that addresses the reason for deletion – there's not much to say here, it's too early. I'm happy to restore it and someone can take it to AfD, I guess? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron Can you do that please? I would really appreciate it.

People have started editing those pages probably thinking this would continue to exist.

@Significa liberdade deleted it saying that it needs to be speedily deleted because it was a article that had already been deleted prior (or something along the lines of that. But before the articles are inevitably deleted because when I contest it, my voice doesn't matter, I copy them all for future use when more info comes out so @Significa liberdade will always have a problem with them if that's his problem with the articles.

So when the official bids came out in June, I brought back the pages and I think they were 100% wrongfully deleted. I could understand the deletion a bit more in January 2024, but since then, with the official bids being known, they shouldn't have been deleted again. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

ILoveSport2006: As I note, I did not delete the articles. I nominated them for speedy deletion, and then one of the editors I named above actually deleted the articles. Articles previously deleted via discussion may be tagged for speedy deletion, but then not deleted because they are significantly different from the previous article or enough has changed. For example, there may be a deletion discussion about an actor early in their career where the community decides the person is not notable enough for Wikipedia's standards. A few years later, another editor may create a new page, and an editor like myself might see the page was deletion via discussion and tag is for speedy deletion. Then another editor with special privileges might look at the article and say, "This actor has received much more media coverage than the last discussion, so I reject the speedy deletion." In the case of the handball articles, it's up to that editor to determine if the new article has enough sources and is different enough from the previous articles to determine it is no longer too soon for the articles. Does that make sense? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I've undeleted the two I deleted. Someone else is welcome to take them to AfD if they want to. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Luke Beardon

Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luke Beardon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Osyana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osyana, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osyana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Deep (Dunmore novel)

Hi, just letting you know I reverted your redirect of this article. I honestly don't have a problem with merging the book articles with the Ingo tetralogy article, but it should be all four novels. Just taking out one leaves an annoying gap; it bothers me. -- Robina Fox (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Robina Fox: Can you find sources to establish notability for this article? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I added a couple of refs. Not very substantial, but still... -- Robina Fox (talk) 15:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Robina Fox: Thanks for adding those sources! However, when adding sources to an article, please make sure the sources are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage of the subject. This is how notability is established. Another user has determined that the sources added were not adequate to establish notability. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJohnchristo42&redlink=1

one of many indian users with lack of language/writing/formal skills, i notice around sport pages; ban would be very helpful. regards! Cenderabird (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Cenderabird: We typically don't ban user simply because they lack writing skills as they can contribute to Wikipedia in multiple ways beyond writing, such as by adding citations. Further, pages can be tagged to note there are grammatical issues, which another editor can address without necessary creating the content. If you think this editor is otherwise engaging in question able behaviour, I recommend checking out Wikipedia's article about bans. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of IV.AI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IV.AI, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IV.AI (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

RfA nomination?

Hey there, Significa liberdade! Clovermoss and I have been working together to find users who would make great candidates at RfA and great admins – I was a little surprised to see your name on the list, because I thought you were an admin already! I've seen your name around a bunch, with only positive impressions. You have a great content record, do lots of work in admin-like spaces, and seeing the way you handled this thread on your talk only convinced me more. If you're interested in becoming an admin, let me know! We can talk more here, or you can find me on email or Discord (same username). thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Theleekycauldron (and Clovermoss)! Thank you for the kind words! I mainly haven't considered RfA because I'm not sure how I would use any of the additional privileges given my current strengths, background, interests, etc. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

You might find my approach to this in my RfA interesting because I also didn't have a strong "need" for the tools. I genuinely believe that a few more people pitching in where they can is good but I also understand completely if the RfA process itself makes you hesitant. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Seconded – we could always use more admins who are willing to help out wherever they can. If you're looking for a place to get comfortable with the tools, I think you could put your experience at CSD and AfD to good use dealing with other people's nominations :) from there, you can branch out! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)