Bahooka
McCabe's Guitar in Long Beach
editYou removed the McCabe's link from the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band article, saying that the Long Beach shop was not affiliated with the famous Santa Monica one. I find this hard to believe. How can you have two shops in SoCal with the same uncommon name without a relationship? However, I can't find anything online that relates them. In fact, I can't find anything about the Long Beach shop at all. Do you know anything more? Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Here is a newspaper article from the Long Beach Press-Telegram about the McCabe's in Long Beach (which I used to drive by all the time.) I'll see if I can find a source about no relationship. Bahooka (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- More links can be found here and here, although one is a forum that we usually don't post as a reference. But at least you can see the McCabe's in Long Beach existed and that it appears to be a separate entity with separate owners. Best, Bahooka (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- The sources only talk about the situation as it existed in the 1980s. I have a strong suspicion that, given the less-than-common-name, the Santa Monica store could have expanded into Long Beach and then later sold it. In the early 1970s, it was common to believe that they were connected. However, I cannot find a single source to even suggest such a thing. Even the McCabe's web-site says nothing about the Long Beach store. Naturally, I support removing the wiki-link from the Dirt Band article, but I am puzzled that I can't find anything online about that store. We tend to think that we can Google anything and find it, but there are still mysteries. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 26
edit
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
- Bytes in brief
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 27
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
- User Group
- Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
- Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Saab 9-3
edit'Bahooka' You removed an edit correcting an omission re Saab 9-3 models. I own one exactly as mentioned. Do you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accurate123 (talk • contribs) 10:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Are you talking about this edit from three years ago? If so, making a POV comment saying "No wonder Wikipedia has developed a reputation for incorrect/incomplete information" along with the long line of periods, as well as the unsourced information, was why your edits were reverted. You may want to discuss on the article talk page at Talk:Saab 9-3 if you still have an issue with it after this many years. Bahooka (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 28
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
- #1Bib1Ref
- New partners
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
- Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 29
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
- New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
- Wikimania
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 30
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
- Library Card translation
- Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Hello, Bahooka. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 31
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
- OAWiki
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Common criticism of Mormons for being deviant version of Christianity
editHi. This is a revert you did a year ago in Criticism of Mormons article after I added a line that this "deviant version of Christianity" was a main criticism of the LDS. I can't find a reason stated for your reversion, although this has been and still is one of the most-often voiced anti-Mormon comments. If we search for critique of Mormonism on youtube, about half of the videos are Cristians saying "stay clear of these fake Christians." And there's massive written documentation of my claim from 1830 to present. Why didn't you want that in the article? I doubt you're a Saint who doesn't want this brought up? And my personal opinion is that the Christians are straining to make this doctrinal quibble seem substantial. ?? Thanks, Alan Moabalan (talk) 21:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 37
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Issue 38, January – April 2020
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
- New partnership
- Global roundup
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
- Library Card Platform
- New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Under Armour
editIf a college is clearly sponsored by Under Armour, but there’s no article to cite, then what do you suggest I do? ScottHayter82 (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
I want to add to Under Armour’s page, but at the same time I don’t all my work to immediately be erased. ScottHayter82 (talk) 03:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- There needs to be some kind of verifiable evidence that a college or person is sponsored by Under Armour. See the Wikipedia policy at Wikipedia:Verifiability. That will be a good guide for you as you begin to edit Wikipedia. Most of the references either didn't exist or were just a link to the athletics program at the school. Best, Bahooka (talk) 04:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 40
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
- New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
- #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
- AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Accusations of Vandalism
editGood afternoon. I noticed that you have reverted two of my edits, and have made the serious accusation that I am vandalizing Wikipedia. I take this accusation very seriously. You will notice that I provided a reference for each of my edits. You either were too lazy to read the citations, or you decided to abandon the principle of fairness. I'd like to see if we can get past this incident and extend an olive branch to you. Best wishes.TheSwedishPorcupine (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Those were bogus references. Stop vandalizing Wikipedia. Bahooka (talk) 17:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 41
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
- New partnership: Taxmann
- WikiCite
- 1Lib1Ref 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes - Issue 42
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
- New EBSCO collections now available
- 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
- Library Card input requested
- Libraries love Wikimedia, too!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 42
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
- New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
- 1Lib1Ref
- Library Card
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 43
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
- New Library Card designs
- 1Lib1Ref May
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 45
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
- Library design improvements continue
- New partnerships
- 1Lib1Ref update
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 46
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
- Library design improvements deployed
- New collections available in English and German
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 47
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
- On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
- Search tool deployed
- New My Library design improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 48
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 49
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
- New library collections
- Blog post published detailing technical improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 50
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
- New library partner - SPIE
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 51
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
- New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Edit at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
editDear Bahooka, I see that you reverted an edit I made regarding the name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, and its members. I am new, so I was unaware that saying 'do note...' would not work. I am thankful that you considered it good faith. I just wanted to make sure with you that if I re-edited the page to include the necessary information, while not using phrases like 'do note that...' things could work. Thank you Dart365 (talk) 20:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- I would not include that information in the lede section. It is already long enough. The information about using the full name of church by President Nelson is already included in the first section, the one titled Terminology. If you want additional information about that topic in the article, I would discuss it on the article's talk page first to get more feedback from other editors. Good luck on your editing! Bahooka (talk) 23:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice. Good luck to you as well. Dart365 (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
MOS:LDS change discussion
editA change to a provision at MOS:LDS regarding capitalization in titles is currently being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters § Midsentence capitalization of the that you might be interested in. Please participate in the discussion there, thanks. --FyzixFighter (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 52
edit The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
- New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 53
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
- New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
- Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
- New feature: Outage notification
- Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 54
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
- New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
- 1Lib1Ref 2023
- Spotlight: EDS Refine Results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 55
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
- New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
- 1Lib1Ref January report
- Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Chevrolet Suburban
edit"All content must be verifiable." What could be more verifiable than a vehicle VIN or serial number which indicates in it the plant of manufacture? Nothing is more verifiable than that. So, what exactly is your problem then? 108.6.237.202 (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Your changes need to come from a published source. Cite it per WP policy. Doing your own analysis of VINs is original research, which is not allowed. Bahooka (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- First of all, analyzing VINs is more reliable than any published source because published sources can be wrong but vehicle VINs cannot. And, one can also say that a VIN is indeed a published source. It is "published" on the placard on the vehicle by the automaker that produced the vehicle. Second, any published source begins somewhere with original research. If you trace all the sources cited and keep tracing each source back farther and farther to its origination, you will sooner or later find "original research". So, if "original research" is not allowed, then nothing should be allowed. Of course, that would result in wikipedia disappearing and every other source of knowledge right along with it, all because of some arbitrary rule that makes no sense. Everything is "original research" if you go far enough back.
- I have to say that users like you are quite interesting. You appear to want to enforce all these arbitrary rules so that everything is accurate and verified. But I have seen so many mistakes and inaccuracies on wikipedia which obviously nobody ever said anything about because they were published and stayed like that for a long time with no objections by anyone. But yet when someone comes along and tries to fix errors or add more relevant information, then all these users miraculously come out of the woodwork trying to enforce arbitrary rules. Where were all your rules before when people published incorrect information? Then, those rules were nowhere to be found. Is the goal simply to blindly enforce rules just for the sake of enforcing rules or is the goal to get correct and accurate information for all people to have available? I think that is a question worth pondering. 108.6.237.202 (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- I disagree with your assessment of Wikipedia policies and the reason you believe your edits are better than a published source. However, my talk page is not the best place for this discussion so I am ending it here. We can go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles to see where other editors feel the same way as me about your edits since they are already being discussed there. Bahooka (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
WP BYU Invite
edit| BRIGHAM NEEDS YOU! | |
Hello, Brother Brigham here.
I couldn't help but notice that you've made some edits to articles about Brigham Young University and thought you might want to become a member of the BYU WikiProject. We're reviving the project and would love your help! To join simply add your name to the participant list and start working on something from the To-do list. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask another project member. See you soon!  |
|
A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For dealing with that LTA (User:Lithuaniaball2) on List of Ford vehicles and Ford Mustang Mach-E. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks! Bahooka (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Lithuaniaball2.... that vandal's been causing a lot of cross wiki disruption lately. Again, thanks for fighting that sockfarm. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 03:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Revert on Porsche 930
editHey there! I agree with your edit, however I feel like there is a better term we could use other than "top-of-the-line" as it sounds very weaselly and like something you would say in an ad for the car. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe there is a more encyclopedic term. We can both think about that for awhile. Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yep. I'm fairly sure there is, I'm just blanking on it right now. Maybe some snooping around will help. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 56
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023
- New partner:
- Perlego
- Library access tips and tricks
- Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Sun Belt Cities
editHey!! You better NOT vandalize articles, like you did to the Sun Belt’s Table of Major Cities section! What the f*** is wrong with you?! Plus, I do NOT find anything wrong about the table of Sun Belt Cities, not everything has to be sourced you dumba$$! MakeAmericaGreatAgain901 (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- First of all, it was not vandalism. If you look at my edit summary, it states that I am removing it per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Second, everything on Wikipedia actually DOES need to be sourced. One of the policies of Wikipedia is Wikipedia:Verifiability. And third, please watch your tone and language with other editors (like me.) Another Wikipedia policy is Wikipedia:Civility. I will create a discussion on the talk page for the removal of that section. Bahooka (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 57
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023
- Suggestion improvements
- Favorite collections tips
- Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 58
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023
- New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
- Tech tip: Filters
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
strange
editok. go and revert the Lamborghini Miura also! Poker7p7p (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. I just removed the number produced from that article, too. You can find more information on what goes in an infobox at Template:Infobox automobile. Best, Bahooka (talk) 20:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Your welcome! please revert these three edits also. thanks Lamborghini Murciélago, Lamborghini Diablo, Lamborghini Gallardo. Poker7p7p (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- I will, but you know you can remove them also. Bahooka (talk) 23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 59
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
- Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
- Tech tip: Library access methods
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Why are you removing my work on the Scion page?
editWhy are you removing my work on the Scion page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scionnn (talk • contribs)
- Did you read my edit summaries? Your edits did not comply with WP:ELDEAD and WP:CARTRIVIA. Please discuss why you think the edits belong on the article talk page at Talk:Scion (automobile) instead of continuing to readd those edits. Bahooka (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes i did. But my newer edit did not include dead links. I disregarded Scion.com and went forward another part about Scion, using an alive link from Archive.org. Is that also banned? Scionnn (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- What link was from archive.org? And per WP:ELDEAD, "updates may include adding an archive URL, but only if the archive version has substantially the same content and user experience as the original, many websites no longer function the same when archived." Bahooka (talk) 20:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- This link. https://web.archive.org/web/20150516005550mp_/https://www.facebook.com/scion Scionnn (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Facebook is not an official site nor is it a reliable source for any content. In addition, this was for trivia that does not belong in an encyclopedia. See WP:CARTRIVIA. Bahooka (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- But this is the official scion facebook? Can you lead me where on WP:CARTRIVIA it says its not a reliable source? Scionnn (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is no official Scion Facebook account because Scion no longer exists. As I directed earlier, take this discussion to the article talk page at Talk:Scion (automobile). See if you can get some support for your edits there. Bahooka (talk) 06:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- But this is the official scion facebook? Can you lead me where on WP:CARTRIVIA it says its not a reliable source? Scionnn (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Facebook is not an official site nor is it a reliable source for any content. In addition, this was for trivia that does not belong in an encyclopedia. See WP:CARTRIVIA. Bahooka (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- This link. https://web.archive.org/web/20150516005550mp_/https://www.facebook.com/scion Scionnn (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- What link was from archive.org? And per WP:ELDEAD, "updates may include adding an archive URL, but only if the archive version has substantially the same content and user experience as the original, many websites no longer function the same when archived." Bahooka (talk) 20:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes i did. But my newer edit did not include dead links. I disregarded Scion.com and went forward another part about Scion, using an alive link from Archive.org. Is that also banned? Scionnn (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Drakan Spyder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Zero indication of notability. Sources are promotional
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 60
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
- Three new partners
- Google Scholar integration
- How to track partner suggestions
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 61
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
- Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
- 1Lib1Ref results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 62
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024
- IEEE and Haaretz now available
- Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
- Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Removing information
editHey, why do you keep on removing the successor information on the Bugatti Chiron page? GylonVisagie (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Because there is no reference and no article supporting the edit. Write an article and add a reference, and it can probably stay. See WP:CRYSTAL about future events. Bahooka (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Cadillac
editHello. The ' In Popular Culture ' sub-heading added to ' Cadillac ', yesterday, is capable of great expansion. Many articles show how knowledge can be greatly broadened by directing those of particular interests, (in this case cars), to other subjects they had considered before, (in this example, to a singer). This widening of knowledgee's family is what leads to a fuller understanding of one subject, and broader awareness of others, which, whilst we may still be out-of-sympathy with them, at least keeps our minds in a healthier state of enquiry than obsessions, which can become retarding. It's my hope that you'll agree with that. I should like us to reach a two-party consensus on this by returning the sub-heading with the start which I have given it, in order to achieve what I've described; which is surely one of the greatest justifications for pursuing knowledge, rather than the futile accumulation of disparate facts just to see how high redundant additions can be piled; which the edit could be construed, by it's removal, to be taken as trying to prevent. I understand this consensus could be in a newly-written form, but a complete excision of it has established I contend, a wrong principle; which is to be resistant to the opportunity to increase a subject's enjoyment. I hope you find the opportunity to reply soon. If you disagree, I can quite understand a different point of view, but, like you, unless persuaded, (which I could be), that I'm wrong, I should like, please, to know how to pursue my contention that it should stay. I shall be interested to read a persuasive reply. Thanks. Heath St John (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- This topic is best discussed at the article talk page so other editors can weigh in. Please move the discussion there. Also, and most important, see if your edit complies with the WP:CARTRIVIA convention that was established after much discussion. Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- I've done that. Heath St John (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The problems w/Alex Boyé article
editGreetings, there are two problems with the info you restored:
- The first source which you modified makes no mention of how many children they have. And having been published in 2012, it definitely doesn't support the portion that says that they added another in 2021. Since the source does not verify the claim, the claim should either be removed, or a source that verifies it should be put in place of the existing one. I could find no sources that verify either seven or eight children.
- The second source which remains unchanged from before, does not mention Boyé, and doesn't link to any video of Boyé either. By the same rationale, the claims must be removed, unless you have ones that do verify the claims.
I'm puzzled by your parenthetical that "it doesn't have to be on the internet to be verifiable". True, but non-sequitur. If an online source is being used as a reference, that reference must support the claim. Neither of the references support the claims. If you have non-online sources that verify the claims, by all means, add them; but absent them, the existing sources do not verify the claims, so, the content and sources must be removed. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 19:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, after rereading a few times and checking the references, I agree. I think I just focused on finding the link. I'm for removing the content as you originally did. In fact, I will self-revert my edit.
- Regarding verifiability, I was going off of WP:SOURCEACCESS on the WP:V page. A print copy of the Deseret News is likely available in Utah libraries (Deseret News wasn't solely digital until 2021.) It's kind of a moot point since I found on online link, but that was the thought process on the newspaper citation. Thanks for your thoughts, Bahooka (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood, and thanks! cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 63
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024
- One new partner
- 1Lib1Ref
- Spotlight: References check
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Ford Five Hundred
editCan you look at the lede's first sentence also; I'm fuzzy on the application of the hyphen rules. Thx! 842U (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Happy to. I added a hyphen to five-passenger, but that was the only thing I saw. Thanks for all your improvements to this article. Best, Bahooka (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Reformed Egyptian
editSince you believe these are related, I've linked Egyptian back to reformed Egyptian to ensure we don't have a one way link problem. If its removed, be prepared to prove reformed Egyptian is related to Egyptian with a scholarly source 166.198.21.32 (talk) 01:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- They reverted me, saying the two are not related. I'm removing it again. Take it to one of the two talk pages 166.198.21.32 (talk) 01:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- To me it seemed logical to include the link to Egyptian as a See also item as the beliefs of the church indicate it was derived from the Egyptian writing system. However, I'm not going to pursue it further. Thanks for the note. Bahooka (talk) 04:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Need urgent help⚠️
editThe guy who’s vandalizing the pages Nauvoo Expositor is attacking my talk page and he has given me a fake warning about an editing war. If you could intervene and remove that warning it would be appreciated. John Bois (talk) 02:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Whoa! 107.116.165.18 (talk) 02:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- It wouldn't be good if you picked up an edit war after being canvassed into it. 107.116.165.18 (talk) 02:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, too late. I'll look for an active admin to help us sort this out. 107.116.165.18 (talk) 02:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I restored the blanked content at 2:36, preceding this request at 2:40. Bahooka (talk) 04:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, too late. I'll look for an active admin to help us sort this out. 107.116.165.18 (talk) 02:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- It wouldn't be good if you picked up an edit war after being canvassed into it. 107.116.165.18 (talk) 02:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Edit Warring Report
editNotice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 107.116.165.18 (talk) 03:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Obsolete NCAP protocols
editHello. The protocols are the rules governing the NCAP tests. Obsolete means they are old tests where 5 stars do not guarantee a "safe" vehicle according to the current expectations for the region. Regards. Trigenibinion (talk) 07:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. Do you have a citation for each of these vehicles stating this? It appears to be original research, which is against Wikipedia policy. Bahooka (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- These NCAP articles detail the protocol changes with references. Trigenibinion (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- The references from your last two car edits say nothing about obsolete protocols. Bahooka (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- The references are in the NCAP articles, not each car article. See "Comparison groups". Some protocol changes may appear also elsewhere in those articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with that approach. The reference should directly support the content in each article. I think you should discuss this approach at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles. Bahooka (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- The references are in the NCAP articles, not each car article. See "Comparison groups". Some protocol changes may appear also elsewhere in those articles. Trigenibinion (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- The references from your last two car edits say nothing about obsolete protocols. Bahooka (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- These NCAP articles detail the protocol changes with references. Trigenibinion (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 64
edit The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024
- The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
- Wikimania presentation
- New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
editHello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,