Talk:Mountain's Edge, Nevada

Mountain's Edge article

what is wrong with this article there not alot refs about Mountain's Edge, Nevada. (Las vegas kid (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)).

Well, basically the tags say it all. It needs copy editing. It needs updating to change the tone from a press release to an encyclopedic tone. It needs updating to to show what exists vs what is planned vs what is no longer going to happen. It needs a mention about the issues resulting from the variances granted that allowed the narrow streets and virtually no existent driveways and the resulting parking problems. Probably the slow development of services in the community could be encyclopedic if written correctly. But overall it needs major work in rewriting to include encyclopedic material written in an encyclopedic tone. More in line references to support claims aond controversial facts need specific citation. WP:OR should be avoided and WP:RS and WP:V should be followed to meet WP:N. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

What bothers me is they show a marginally satisfactory map for every other part of Las Vegas, except Mountain's Edge. We're just a dot! But having us listed as LOW Importance / LOW INTEREST really hurts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.163.103 (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Almost all small or unincorporated place articles are shown as low importance. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)