Talk:Michael Taylor (forester)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 75.109.250.166 in topic Is the name for the page okay

Is the name for the page okay

edit

If someone enters wikipedia and searches for this Michael Taylor, will the name of this article enable them to find his information? Does the name need tweaking? Redirect? I'm not sure how to edit that stuff anyway, hence the question here in case someone wants to lend a hand. ThreeWikiteers (talk) 04:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've put an entry on the Michael Taylor disambiguation page that should should help people to find this. As regards the name, we should really go by what sources call him - I note that The Washington Post calls him an "amateur naturalist", but that's probably a bit too general. What do other people call him? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
My guess is that the typical person who has heard or read about him, would most likely search for him as "Michael Taylor" with some other keyword attached like "redwood" or "redwoods". Taylor is not a climber. So the association is pretty much with redwoods and tallest trees. Exploring, finding and measuring. ThreeWikiteers (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
I would call him a forest expert or tall trees expert. Forester is inaccurate. In California, "forester" typically means someone who works in the forestry field, usually with a professional forestry license, which he does not have. He is certainly more than a "amateur naturalist" though! 75.109.250.166 (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Contest Speedy Deletion

edit

Michael Taylor left a big enough mark on culture. His tree discoveries are not only world records, but provided subjects for author Richard Preston to write about, and trees for scientist Stephen Sillett to climb and reasearch. This provided a surge of publicity which helped Save the Redwoods League and Humboldt State University in regards to funding and support. Taylor is connected to the whole scenerio of redwood preservation, measuring, etc. ThreeWikiteers (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Given some weeks, even more good substance can be found for this page. ThreeWikiteers (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Taylor (forester). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Taylor (forester). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply