This article needs attention from an expert in Journalism. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.(July 2011) |
The template {{Expand}} has been deprecated since 26 December 2010, and is retained only for old revisions. If this page is a current revision, please remove the template.
Operation Motorman was a 2003 investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office into allegations of offences under the Data Protection Act by the British press.[1][2][3]
The ICO first became aware of the scale of the problem in November 2002, when an ICO investigator attended a search under warrant of John Boyall,[4] a private investigator in Surrey. Documents found on the premises revealed the misuse of data from the Police National Computer. This discovery led to two investigations: Operation Motorman, conducted by the ICO, and Operation Glade, conducted by the Metropolitan Police.[3]
The ICO later obtained search warrants for the Hampshire office of a private detective Steve Whittamore.[5] A huge cache of documents revealed, in precise detail, a network of police and public employees illegally selling personal information obtained from government computer systems. The personal information that Whittamore obtained from his network was passed on to journalists working for various newspapers including the News of the World, the Sunday Times, the Observer, the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror.[5] At least 305 different reporters have been identified as customers of the network.[6]
In February 2004, four suspects plead guilty to conspiring to commit misconduct in public office: Wittamore and Boyall, retired police officer Alan King, and Paul Marshall, a police communications officer.[7] The four were given conditional discharges. Other members of Whittamore's network were due to stand trial but the case collapsed.[8]
In September 2011, the original lead investigator of Operation Motorman criticised the senior management of the ICO for the way in which the investigation was handled. He stated that investigators were prohibited from interviewing journalists and alleged that this was because the management "were frightened". He said that had the team been allowed to question journalists the use of phone hacking might have been uncovered earlier.[9]
References
- ^ Rachel McAthy (4 February 2011). "Observer seeks to distinguish 'Operation Motorman' from the phone-hacking scandal". journalism.co.uk. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
- ^ Laura Tyler and Phil Hartley (8 March 2011). "Fleet Street phone-hacking scandal: a legal perspective". The In-House Lawyer. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
- ^ a b "What Price Privacy?". Information Commissioner's Office. 10 May 2006. Retrieved 6 July 2011.
- ^ "What Price Privacy Now?". Information Commissioner's Office. December 2006. Retrieved 20 August 2011.
- ^ a b James Robinson (21 September 2010). "Newspapers used me as fall guy, says convicted private eye". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- ^ Brian Brady and James Hanning (12 September 2010). "Read all about it: The secret dossier of lawbreaking that spells trouble for Rupert Murdoch...and David Cameron". The Independent on Sunday. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- ^ Nick Davies (11 March 2011). "Jonathan Rees: private investigator who ran empire of tabloid corruption". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- ^ Nick Davies (31 August 2009). "Operation Motorman: the full story revealed". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- ^ "Exposed after eight years: a private eye's dirty work for Fleet Street". The Independent. 14 September 2011. Retrieved 14 September 2011.
See also
- Operation Weeting
- Operation Tuleta
- Operation Elveden
- Operation Rubicon
- Operation Glade
- News International phone hacking scandal