Title:Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World

Abstract:The increasing presence of AI-generated content on the internet raises a critical question: What happens when generative machine learning models are pretrained on web-scale datasets containing data created by earlier models? Some authors prophesy \textit{model collapse} under a `{\it replace}' scenario: a sequence of models, the first trained with real data and each later one trained {\it only on} synthetic data from its preceding model. In this scenario, models successively degrade. Others see collapse as avoidable; in an `{\it accumulate}' scenario, a sequence of models is trained, but each training uses all real and synthetic data generated so far. In this work, we deepen and extend the study of these contrasting scenarios. First, collapse versus avoidance of collapse is studied by comparing the replace and accumulate scenarios on each of three prominent generative modeling settings; we find the same contrast emerges in all three settings. Second, we study a compromise scenario; the available data remains the same as in the {\it accumulate} scenario -- but unlike {\it accumulate} and like {\it replace}, each model is trained using a fixed compute budget; we demonstrate that model test loss on real data is larger than in the {\it accumulate} scenario, but apparently plateaus, unlike the divergence seen with {\it replace}. Third, we study the relative importance of cardinality and proportion of real data for avoiding model collapse. Surprisingly, we find a non-trivial interaction between real and synthetic data, where the value of synthetic data for reducing test loss depends on the absolute quantity of real data. Our insights are particularly important when forecasting whether future frontier generative models will collapse or thrive, and our results open avenues for empirically and mathematically studying the context-dependent value of synthetic data.