Next Article in Journal
Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Based T1 Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Atomistic Study on the Mechanical Properties of HOP–Graphene Under Variable Strain, Temperature, and Defect Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrical Characteristics of Solution-Based Thin-Film Transistors with a Zinc-Tin Oxide/Carbon Nanotube Stacked Nanocomposite Active Layer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetocaloric Effect in 3D Gd(III)-Oxalate Coordination Framework

1
Key Laboratory of Structure and Functional Regulation of Hybrid Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Institutes of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
2
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Energy Storage and Novel Cell Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 3 December 2024 / Revised: 26 December 2024 / Accepted: 27 December 2024 / Published: 28 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoelectronics: Materials, Devices and Applications (Second Edition))

Abstract

:
Cryogenic magnetic refrigerants based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) hold significant potential as substitutes for the expensive and scarce He-3. Gd(III)-based complexes are considered excellent candidates for low-temperature magnetic refrigerants. We have synthesized a series of Ln(III)-based metal-organic framework (MOF) Ln-3D (Ln = Gd/Dy) by the slow release of oxalates in situ from organic ligands (disodium edetate dehydrate (EDTA-2Na) and thiodiglycolic acid). Structural analysis shows that the Ln-3D is a neutral 3D framework with one-dimensional channels connected by [Ln(H2O)3]3+ as nodes and C2O42− as linkers. Magnetic measurements show that Gd-3D exhibits very weak antiferromagnetic interactions with a maximum −ΔSm value of 36.6 J kg−1 K−1 (−ΔSv = 74.47 mJ cm−3 K−1) at 2 K and 7 T. The −ΔSm value is 28.4 J kg−1 K−1 at 2 K and 3 T, which is much larger than that of commercial Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG), indicating its potential as a low-temperature magnetic refrigerant.

1. Introduction

In molecular magnets, molecule-based materials for magnetic refrigeration via the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) have garnered significant attention due to their benefits, including environmental sustainability and energy efficiency [1]. Magnetic entropy change (−ΔSm) is a critical metric for assessing MCE performance. A large −ΔSm value at low temperatures indicates superior performance of a cryomagnetic refrigerant [2]. High efficiency MCE requires magnetic molecules possessing negative magnetic anisotropy, large total spin ground states and low-lying excited spin states [3]. Among many metals, Gd3+ ion, characterized by a high spin state value (S = 7/2) and isotropic nature, makes Gd(III)-based complexes excellent candidates for magnetic refrigeration materials [4,5]. Additionally, weak magnetic interactions between Gd3+ ions are conductive to enhancing MCE. Consequently, the cryogenic magnetic refrigeration performance of many Gd(III)-based complexes, including 0D discrete clusters (−ΔSm = 41.8 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd27, −ΔSm = 43.0 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd32, −ΔSm = 39.66 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd36, −ΔSm = 38.7 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd37, −ΔSm = 43.6 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd48, −ΔSm = 48.0 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd60, −ΔSm = 46.9 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd104 and −ΔSm = 38.0 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd140) [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], 1D chains, 2D layers and 3D frameworks (such as −ΔSm = 69.5 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd(CO3)F, −ΔSm = 76.2 J kg−1 K−1 of Gd(OH)F2 etc.) [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] have been explored and reported one after another. These studies indicate that increasing magnetic density is one of the key strategies for enhancing −ΔSm value.
Magnetic density can be improved by increasing the metal coordination number or reducing the content of non-metal components to raise the metal/ligand ratio. Low-molecular weight ligands with multiple negative charges and high coordination capacity are essential for satisfying the high coordination demands of Gd3+ ions and balancing the concentrated positive charges. Currently, Gd(III)-based clusters or Gd(III)-based frameworks constructed with formate, acetate, and carbonate ligands have shown excellent MCE [23,24,25], particularly the large-volume entropy (−ΔSv) resulting from high metal/ligand ratios. Good candidates for cryogenic magnetic coolers are those complexes in which Gd3+ ions’ centers are sufficiently isolated from each other to maintain paramagnetic behavior even at temperatures as low as 2 K. Increasing the dimensionality of Gd-based complexes is an effective approach to enhance magnetic density while ensuring the isolation of Gd3+ ions from one another. Unlike these small carboxylate ligands, oxalate is a bridge-like carboxylate ligand featuring rigid coplanar and small steric hindrance. Oxalate offers various coordination modes and can display suitable configurations, forming extended structures by connecting with metal centers, and meeting the high coordination demands of Ln3+ ions and controllable structural dimensions of complexes. Investigations showed that the most reported oxalate-based Gd-containing complexes primarily exhibit 1D chain or 2D layer systems [26,27], while only a few cases about 3D metal-organic framework structures have been reported [28,29].
Here, a series of oxalate-based 3D frameworks Ln-3D with the formulas {[Ln(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3]•xH2O}n and (Ln = Gd, x = 3, Gd-3D; Ln = Dy, x = 5, Dy-3D) were obtained using the solvent–thermal reaction of disodium edetate dehydrate (EDTA-2Na), thiodiglycolic acid and Ln(NO3)3. The C2O42− ions were derived from the in situ decomposition of EDTA-2Na and thiodiglycolic acid. Magnetic measurements show that Gd-3D exhibits a very weak paramagnetic interaction and Dy-3D displays weak antiferromagnetic interaction. Gd-3D shows a large −ΔSm value of 36.65 J kg−1 K−1 (−ΔSv = 74.47 mJ cm−3 K−1) at 2 K and 7 T, contributing to the weak paramagnetic interaction and large metal/ligand ratio. Although the −ΔSm value of 36.65 J kg−1 K−1 is slightly slower than that reported for previous Gd(III)-MOF, its −ΔSm value of 28.37 J kg−1 K−1 at 2 K and 3 T is much larger than that of commercial Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG), suggesting its potential as a low-temperature magnetic refrigeration material.

2. Materials and Methods

All materials and reagents used were obtained from commercial sources. Magnetic measurements were performed using a Quantum Design MPMSXL magnetometer (San Jose, CA, USA). Powder X-ray diffraction data were collected using a Rigaku Ultima IV powder X-ray diffractometer. The contents of C, H and N were determined using a Vario EL-3 elemental analyzer (EA, El Cajon, CA, USA). The element contents of Gd and Dy were determined using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) based on the sample concentration of 20 μg mL−1. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were performed on a VERTEX 80 FT−IR spectrophotometer (Boston, MA, USA) with KBr pellets. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a thermal analyzer (TGA-5500, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) under a N2 flow rate of 100 L min−1 with a heating rate of 3 °C min−1.
Synthesis of {[Gd(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3]•3H2O}n (Gd-3D). EDTA-2Na (0.3 mmol, 87.6 mg), thiodiglycolic acid (0.2 mmol, 30.0 mg), Na2CO3 (0.5 mmol, 52.9 mg), 2-methylimidazole (1.0 mmol, 82.1 mg) and Gd(NO3)3 (1.0 mL, 1.0 M) were dissolved in deionized water (7.0 mL). The resulting mixture was transferred into a polytetrafluoroethylene liner and then placed in a stainless-steel autoclave resistant to high temperature and high pressure for solvent–thermal reaction. The temperature program used is as follows: the temperature rises to 160 °C over 2 h and is maintained at 160 °C for 72 h; then it gradually cools down to room temperature over 12 h. The resulting reaction solution was filtered and evaporated at room temperature for about 1 week to yield rod-like colorless crystals. Anal. C3H16GdO14: C, 9.06; H, 3.04; Gd, 7.91. Found (%): C, 8.90; H, 3.05; Gd, 8.16. The original data are shown in Figure S5. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3356 (s), 1620 (s), 1418 (w), 1384 (m), 1319 (m), 1106 (m), 1053 (w), 1029 (w), 998 (w), 930 (w), 852 (w), 804 (m), 656 (w).
Synthesis of {[Dy(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3]•5H2O}n (Dy-3D). The synthesis steps are the same as for Gd-3D with Gd(NO3)3 replaced by Dy(NO3)3. Anal. C3H16DyO14: C, 8.21; H, 3.67; Dy, 7.41. Found (%): C, 8.78; H, 2.90; Dy, 7.70. The original data are shown in Figure S5. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3356 (s), 1620 (s), 1418 (w), 1384 (m), 1319 (m), 1106 (m), 1053 (w), 1029 (w), 998 (w), 930 (w), 852 (w), 804 (m), 656 (w).
The single crystal data of compounds Gd-3D and Dy-3D were collected at 120 K using a STOE STADIVARI detector equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å). Absorption corrections were applied via the multi-scan program STOE LANA (2.4 8.1). The structures were solved by direct methods with hydrogen atoms of the organic ligands generated geometrically (C-H, 0.96 Å). Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically by least-squares fitting on F2 using the OLEX2 software suite [30,31,32]. Detailed crystallographic data and selected bond lengths and angles are provided in Tables S1–S3. The CCDC numbers of 2401699–2401700 correspond to Gd-3D and Dy-3D, respectively, and can be accessed free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 28 November 2024).

3. Results

3.1. Synthetic Strategy

The anion-templated method is an effective approach for synthesizing lanthanide clusters. In the process of cluster formation, anions not only act as templates to induce the formation of cluster framework, but also act as counterions to balance the excessive positive charges caused by the aggregation of Ln3+ ions, thereby further stabilizing the lanthanide clusters. Particularly, the slow-release anion-templated method, by controlling the rate of anion template formation, facilitates the formation of high-nuclearity metal clusters or high-dimensional cluster-based frameworks. Ligand in situ decomposition is a common method of slow-release anion templating. In this study, although the raw materials EDTA-2Na and thiodiglycolic acid do not directly participate in coordination, the C2O42− anions slowly generated through their decomposition under high temperature and pressure act as the sole ligand binding with Ln3+ anions. When only H2C2O4 or Na2C2O4 is used in the reaction with Ln3+ ions without the presence of EDTA-2Na and thiodiglycolic acid, the target product cannot be obtained. However, when EDTA-2Na, thiodiglycolic acid and Na2C2O4 are present simultaneously, the yield of the target product is significantly improved. Therefore, EDTA-2Na and thiodiglycolic acid also function as buffers during the reaction process.

3.2. Crystal Structures

The compounds Gd-3D and Dy-3D are isostructural, both crystallizing in a trigonal crystal system and belonging to the R-3 space group. Here, Gd-3D is a representative example and its structure will be described in detail. Single-crystal structural analysis shows that Gd-3D is a neutral 3D metal framework {[Gd(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3]•3H2O}n. As shown in Figure 1a, the asymmetric unit [Gd(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3] consists of one Gd3+ ion, 1.5 C2O42− anions and three coordinating water molecules. Single-crystal analysis, combined with EA and TGA data (Figure S1), reveals that each asymmetric unit contains three free water molecules. In Gd-3D, C2O42− acts both as counter-anions and as linkers, connecting Gd3+ ions in the mode of μ4: η1: η1: η1: η1 (Figure 1b). Figure 1c shows that Gd3+ ion has a nine-coordination with tricapped trigonal prism geometry, surrounded by three O atoms from three coordinating water molecules and six O atoms from three C2O42− anions. The bond length of Gd-O ranges from 2.377(11) to 2.536(11) Å, consistent with the previously reported values for oxalate-based lanthanide complexes [26,27]. The compound forms a 3D framework with a 1D channel, constructed from [Gd(H2O)3]3+ as nodes and C2O42− as linkers (Figure 1d). The 3D neutral metal framework not only enhances the dimensionality of the compounds but also eliminates free counter-ions, supporting an improved metal/ ligand ratio.

3.3. Magnetic Properties

Powder samples of Gd-3D and Dy-3D were used to measure their magnetic properties. The sample purity was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). As shown in Figure S2, the experimental PXRD patterns closely match the simulated ones derived from single-crystal data. Magnetic susceptibility measurements of Gd-3D and Dy-3D were conducted in the temperature range of 2–300 K under a direct current field of 1000 Oe (Figure 2a). At 300 K, the obtained experimental χMT values of 7.58 cm3 K mol−1 for Gd-3D and 14.10 cm3 K mol−1 for Dy-3D closely align with the calculated values of 7.87 cm3 K mol−1 for uncoupled Gd3+ (g = 2, J = 7/2) and 14.16 cm3 K mol−1 for uncoupled Dy3+ (g = 4/3, J = 15/2), respectively. For Gd-3D, the χMT value remained almost constant as the temperature decreased to 10 K, and then gradually decreased to 6.9 cm3 K mol−1 at 2 K, indicating an extremely weak magnetic interaction. For Dy-3D, the χMT value was almost unchanged from 300 K to 100 K and then slowly decreased to a minimum value of 10.07 cm3 K mol−1 as the temperature continued to decrease to 2 K, suggesting a weak antiferromagnetic interaction. The χM−1 vs. T curves of Gd-3D and Dy-3D in the range of 2–300 K were fitted based on the Curie–Weiss law (Figure 2b), with Curie constants of 7.68 cm3 mol−1 for Gd-3D and 14.27 cm3 mol−1 for Dy-3D and Weiss constants of −0.09 for Gd-3D and −2.84 for Dy-3D. The near-zero Weiss constant of −0.09 confirms the extremely weak antiferromagnetic interaction in Gd-3D, which is conductive to the improvement of MCE. For Dy-3D, the negative Weiss constant of −2.84 verifies its antiferromagnetic interaction and zero-field splitting effect.
The field-dependent magnetizations of Gd-3D and Dy-3D were measured in 0–7 T at different temperatures. The magnetization value of Dy-3D was 5.75 B at 2 K and 7 T, which is significantly lower than the theoretical value of 10.00 B. Additionally, the magnetization curves of Dy-3D at 2 K, 5 K and 7 K do not overlap into a single curve, further confirming the strong magnetic anisotropy and zero-splitting effect in Dy-3D (Figure 3). However, the results of alternating current magnetic susceptibilities show that Dy-3D shows no frequency-dependent behavior (Figure S3). In contrast, the obtained magnetization value of Gd-3D stabilized at approximately 6.76 B at 2 K and 7 T, closely matching the theoretical saturation value of 7.00 B, indicating the isotropic nature and extremely weak antiferromagnetic interaction of Gd-3D (Figure 4).
The weak magnetic interactions and high metal-to-ligand ratio in Gd-3D indicate its potential as an excellent candidate for magnetic refrigeration applications. The −ΔSm value is a key parameter in assessing MCE, and it can be estimated from the temperature-dependent magnetizations at 2–7 T using the Maxwell equation ∆Sm(T)∆H = ∫[∂M(T, H)/∂T]HdH [33]. As shown in Figure 4b, the maximum −ΔSm value of Gd-3D is 36.67 J kg−1 K−1 at 2 K and 7 T, and the corresponding volume entropy is 74.47 mJ cm−3 K−1. Compared with previously reported oxalate-based magnetic coolers (Table 1), the −ΔSm value of Gd-3D is slightly lower than that of the 2D [Gd2(C2O4)3(H2O)6•0.6H2O] (−ΔSm = 46.6 J kg−1 K−1) [26], [Gd(C2O4)(H2O)3Cl] (−ΔSm = 48.0 J kg−1 K−1) [27], and 3D [Gd(C2O4)0.5(CO3)H2O] (−ΔSm = 50.7 J kg−1 K−1) [29]. Gd-3D exhibits weak antiferromagnetic interactions, while in 3D [Gd(C2O4)0.5(CO3)H2O] [29], the mixed bridging of CO32- and C2O42- between Gd3+ ions leads to weak ferromagnetic interactions. For 2D [Gd2(C2O4)3(H2O)6•0.6H2O] [26], the planar structure formed by C2O42− bridging Gd3+ ions ensures good isolation between magnetic centers within the lattice, resulting in weak paramagnetic behavior. These features are beneficial for enhancing the MCE. The −ΔSm value of Gd-3D is comparable to that of 3D (H6edte)0.5[Gd(C2O4)2(H2O)] [28]. By comparison, both Gd-3D and 3D (H6edte)0.5[Gd(C2O4)2(H2O)] contain C2O42−-bridged Gd3+ ions, and 3D (H6edte)0.5[Gd(C2O4)2(H2O)] has a Weiss constant of −0.09 K [28], almost identical to that of Gd-3D, showing weak antiferromagnetic interactions in both. Additionally, the crystal density is related to the metal content. The volume entropy (−ΔSV) is determined by the −ΔSm and crystal density. As shown in Table 1, the −ΔSV value of Gd-3D at 2 K, 7 T is 74.47 mJ cm−3 K−1, which is lower than that of the reported Gd-based framework materials [25,26,28,29]. This reduction may result from the presence of three free guest water molecules in Gd-3D, leading to decreased crystal density and magnetic density.
Relative cooling power (RCP) is another critical parameter used for evaluating magnetocaloric performance, which is calculated as the product of the maximum −ΔSm value and the corresponding half-peak width [34]. RCP at low temperatures and low fields is particularly significant for practical applications. At 2 K, the −ΔSm value of Gd-3D rapidly increases to 20.37 J kg−1 K−1in the field range from 0.5 to 2.0 T with a corresponding RCP of 68.45 J kg−1, comparable to that of the commercial Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG) at 1.2 K and 2 T [1]. The −ΔSm value of Gd-3D rises to 28.37 J kg−1 K−1at 2 K and 3 T, exceeding that of GGG in the same field [35,36]. The RCP of Gd-3D at 2 K and 3 T is 112 J kg−1, which is slightly higher than that of other Gd-based complexes but significantly lower than that of GGG. This discrepancy may be attributed to the higher non-metallic content in Gd-3D compared to GGG. Nonetheless, the RCP of 198 J kg−1for Gd-3D at 2 K and 7 T indicates that it remains a potential cryogenic refrigerant.
Table 1. Comparison of parameters of selected Gd-based frameworks and other refrigerant materials in the cryogenic zone.
Table 1. Comparison of parameters of selected Gd-based frameworks and other refrigerant materials in the cryogenic zone.
CompoundH
(T)
T
(K)
−ΔSm
(J kg−1 K−1)
−ΔSv
(mJ cm−3 K−1)
RCP
(J kg−1)
Ref.
Gd-3D128.3216.9123.71this work
Gd-3D2220.2241.0968.45this work
Gd-3D3228.3757.65112.01this work
Gd-3D4231.9664.94146.25this work
Gd-3D5233.4467.95171.17this work
Gd-3D6235.2771.67188.99this work
Gd-3D7236.6774.47198.25this work
3D (NH4)[Gd(C2O4)(SO4)(H2O)]7242.4137[29]
3D [Gd(C2O4)0.5(CO3)(H2O)]7250.7165[29]
3D (H6edte)0.5[Gd(C2O4)2(H2O)]9236.884.4[28]
2D [Gd2(C2O4)3(H2O)6•0.6H2O]7246.6139.9[26]
2D [Gd(C2O4)(H2O)3Cl]72.248.0144[25]
Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG)31.224173[35,36]
Gd(HCOO)321.143.6168.5135.47[23]
[{Gd(OAc)3(H2O)2}2]•4H2O20.932.666.5104.41[37]
[Gd(HCOO)(OAc)2(H2O)2]20.937.088.9118.6[24]
Gd2(fum)3(H2O)4•3H2O21.018.045.343.2[16]
Gd3Ga5O12 (GGG)21.220.414567.58[1]
H4edte = N,N,N’,N’’-tetrakis(2-hydroxyethyl)ethlenediamine; fum = fumarate.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have investigated the influence of magnetic interactions and magnetic density on the MCE of Gd-3D. The results of magnetic susceptibilities indicate that Gd-3D exhibits very weak antiferromagnetic interactions, which is beneficial for enhancing MCE. The −ΔSm value of Gd-3D is 36.67 J kg−1 K−1, which is slightly lower than that of the reported oxalate-based Gd(III) complexes, attributed to the presence of additional free water molecules reducing its magnetic density. However, finding low-temperature magnetic refrigerants with an excellent MCE at low fields is even more critical. Compound Gd-3D displays a −ΔSm value of 28.37 J kg−1 K−1 at 2 K and 3 T, surpassing that of commercial GGG, indicating that it still meets requirements as a potential low-temperature magnetic refrigerant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano15010032/s1, Figure S1: The experimental and simulated PXRD spectra of Gd-3D and Dy-3D, respectively; Figure S2: The thermogravimetric analysis of (a) Gd-3D and (b) Dy-3D in N2 atmosphere; Figure S3: The alternate current magnetic susceptibilities (a) in-phase and (b) out-of -phase of Dy-3D under dc field of 1000 Oe; Figure S4: The IR spectra of Gd-3D and Dy-3D; Figure S5: (a) The original data of EA for Gd-3D (NO. 46) and Dy-3D (NO. 47). (b) The original data of ICP-MS for Gd-3D (NO. 4) and Dy-3D (NO. 3) based on the concentration of 20 μg mL−1; Table S1: Crystallographic data for compounds Ln-3D (Ln = Gd/Dy); Table S2: Selected bond distances (Å) and band angles (o) of Gd-3D; Table S3: Selected bond distances (Å) and band angles (o) of Dy-3D.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.-Y.Z.; methodology, all authors; formal analysis, F.-W.L., M.-X.H. and X.-T.W.; data curation, H.T. and C.-C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, F.-W.L. and M.-X.H.; writing—review and editing, H.T. and X.-Y.Z.; project administration, X.-Y.Z.; funding acquisition, X.-Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants number 21901002, 22371001) and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (grant number 2408085Y009).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Han Xu from Kunming Medical University for valuable discussion on crystal analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tishin, A.M.; Spichkin, Y.I. The Magnetocaloric Effect and Its Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, J.-L.; Chen, Y.-C.; Guo, F.-S.; Tong, M.-L. Recent Ddvances in the Design of Magnetic Molecules for Use as Cryogenic Magnetic Coolants. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 281, 26–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, Y.Z.; Zhou, G.J.; Zheng, Z.; Winpenny, R.E. Molecule-based magnetic coolers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1462–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zheng, X.Y.; Kong, X.J.; Zheng, Z.; Long, L.S.; Zheng, L.S. High-nuclearity Lanthanide-Containing Clusters as Potential Molecular Magnetic Coolers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, J.L.; Chen, Y.C.; Tong, M.L. Molecular Design for Cryogenic Magnetic Coolants. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, X.-Y.; Peng, J.-B.; Kong, X.-J.; Long, L.-S.; Zheng, L.-S. Mixed-Anion Templated Cage-like Lanthanide Clusters: Gd27 and Dy27. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lu, T.Q.; Xu, H.; Cheng, L.T.; Wang, X.T.; Chen, C.; Cao, L.; Zhuang, G.L.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, X.Y. Family of Nanoclusters, Ln33 (Ln = Sm/Eu) and Gd32, Exhibiting Magnetocaloric Effects and Fluorescence Sensing for MnO4. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 8861–8869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, M.; Jiang, F.; Kong, X.; Yuan, D.; Long, L.; Al-Thabaiti, S.A.; Hong, M. Two Polymeric 36-Metal Pure Lanthanide Nanosize Clusters. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 3104–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, Y.; Zheng, X.Y.; Cai, J.; Hong, Z.F.; Yan, Z.H.; Kong, X.J.; Ren, Y.P.; Long, L.S.; Zheng, L.S. Three Giant Lanthanide Clusters Ln37 (Ln = Gd, Tb, and Eu) Featuring A Double-Cage Structure. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 2037–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Guo, F.S.; Chen, Y.C.; Mao, L.L.; Lin, W.Q.; Leng, J.D.; Tarasenko, R.; Orendáč, M.; Prokleška, J.; Sechovský, V.; Tong, M.L. Anion—Templated Assembly and Magnetocaloric Properties of A Nanoscale {Gd38} Cage Versus a {Gd48} Barrel. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 14876–14885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Luo, X.M.; Hu, Z.B.; Lin, Q.F.; Cheng, W.; Cao, J.P.; Cui, C.H.; Mei, H.; Song, Y.; Xu, Y. Exploring the Performance Improvement of Magnetocaloric Effect Based Gd-exclusive Cluster Gd60. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11219–11222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, J.B.; Kong, X.J.; Zhang, Q.C.; Orendac, M.; Prokleska, J.; Ren, Y.P.; Long, L.S.; Zheng, Z.; Zheng, L.S. Beauty, Symmetry, and Magnetocaloric Effect-Four-Shell Keplerates with 104 Lanthanide Atoms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17938–17941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, X.Y.; Jiang, Y.H.; Zhuang, G.L.; Liu, D.P.; Liao, H.G.; Kong, X.J.; Long, L.S.; Zheng, L.S. A Gigantic Molecular Wheel of {Gd140}: A New Member of the Molecular Wheel Family. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18178–18181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, F.S.; Leng, J.D.; Liu, J.L.; Meng, Z.S.; Tong, M.L. Polynuclear and Polymeric Gadolinium Acetate Derivatives with Large Magnetocaloric Effect. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Biswas, S.; Adhikary, A.; Goswami, S.; Konar, S. Observation of A Large Magnetocaloric Effect in A 2D Gd(III)-Based Coordination Polymer. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 13331–13334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sedláková, L.; Hanko, J.; Orendáčová, A.; Orendáč, M.; Zhou, C.L.; Zhu, W.H.; Wang, B.W.; Wang, Z.M.; Gao, S. Magnetism and Magnetocaloric Effect in S=7/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet Gd2(fum)3(H2O)4·3H2O. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 487, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.C.; Guo, F.S.; Zheng, Y.Z.; Liu, J.L.; Leng, J.D.; Tarasenko, R.; Orendac, M.; Prokleska, J.; Sechovsky, V.; Tong, M.L. Gadolinium(III)-hydroxy Ladders Trapped in Succinate Frameworks with Optimized Magnetocaloric Effect. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 13504–13510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jia, J.-M.; Liu, S.-J.; Cui, Y.; Han, S.-D.; Hu, T.-L.; Bu, X.-H. 3D GdIII Complex Containing Gd16 Macrocycles Exhibiting Large Magnetocaloric Effect. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 4631–4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.C.; Pan, Y.Y.; Long, L.S.; Zheng, L.S. Magnetocaloric Effect and Thermal Conductivity of Gd(OH)3 and Gd2O(OH)4(H2O)2. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7317–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Black, C.A.; Costa, J.S.; Fu, W.T.; Massera, C.; Roubeau, O.; Teat, S.J.; Aromí, G.; Gamez, P.; Reedijk, J. 3-D Lanthanide Metal-Organic Frameworks: Structure, Photoluminescence, and Magnetism. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, Q.; Liu, B.; Ye, M.; Zhuang, G.; Long, L.; Zheng, L. Gd(OH)F2: A Promising Cryogenic Magnetic Refrigerant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 13787–13793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, Q.F.; Chen, M.T.; Ye, M.Y.; Liu, B.L.; Zhuang, G.L.; Long, L.S.; Zheng, L.S. Accurate Prediction of the Magnetic Ordering Temperature of Ultralow-Temperature Magnetic Refrigerants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 32394–32401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lorusso, G.; Sharples, J.W.; Palacios, E.; Roubeau, O.; Brechin, E.K.; Sessoli, R.; Rossin, A.; Tuna, F.; McInnes, E.J.; Collison, D.; et al. A Dense Metal-Organic Framework for Enhanced Magnetic Refrigeration. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4653–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lorusso, G.; Palacios, M.A.; Nichol, G.S.; Brechin, E.K.; Roubeau, O.; Evangelisti, M. Increasing the Dimensionality of Cryogenic Molecular Coolers: Gd-based Polymers and Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7592–7594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Y.-C.; Qin, L.; Meng, Z.-S.; Yang, D.-F.; Wu, C.; Fu, Z.; Zheng, Y.-Z.; Liu, J.-L.; Tarasenko, R.; Orendáč, M.; et al. Study of a Magnetic-Cooling Material Gd(OH)CO3. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 9851–9858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sibille, R.; Didelot, E.; Mazet, T.; Malaman, B.; François, M. Magnetocaloric Effect in Gadolinium-Oxalate Framework Gd2(C2O4)3(H2O)6⋅(0.6H2O). APL Mater. 2014, 2, 124402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Zhang, Z.M.; Lin, Z.J.; Tong, M.L. Gadolinium Oxalate Derivatives with Enhanced Magnetocaloric Effect via Ionothermal Synthesis. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 9052–9057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Akhtar, M.N.; Chen, Y.-C.; AlDamen, M.A.; Tong, M.-L. 3D Oxalato-Bridged Lanthanide(III) Mofs with Magnetocaloric, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Properties. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.-H.; Liu, A.-J.; Ma, Y.-J.; Han, S.-D.; Hu, J.-X.; Wang, G.-M. A Large Magnetocaloric Effect in Two Hybrid Gd-Complexes: The Synergy of Inorganic and Organic Ligands Towards Excellent Cryo-Magnetic Coolants. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 6352–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sheldrick, G. Crystal Structure Refinement with Shelxl. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. Olex2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sheldrick, G. Shelxt-Integrated Space-Group and Crystal-Structure Determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Evangelisti, M.; Brechin, E.K. Recipes for Enhanced Molecular Cooling. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 4672–4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wood, M.E.; Potter, W.H. General Analysis of Magnetic Refrigeration and Its Optimization Using a New Concept: Maximization of Refrigerant Capacity. Cryogenics 1985, 25, 667–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Daudin, B.; Lagnier, R.; Salce, B. Thermodynamic Properties of the Gadolinium Gallium Garnet, Gd3Ga5O12, between 0.05 and 25 K. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1982, 27, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Slack, G.A.; Oliver, D. Thermal Conductivity of Garnets and Phonon Scattering by Rare-Earth Ions. Phys. Rev. B 1971, 4, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Evangelisti, M.; Roubeau, O.; Palacios, E.; Camon, A.; Hooper, T.N.; Brechin, E.K.; Alonso, J.J. Cryogenic Magnetocaloric Effect in a Ferromagnetic Molecular Dimer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6606–6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structural analysis: (a) The asymmetric unit [Gd(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3]. (b) The connected mode of C2O42− in the 3D framework. (c) The coordination mode of Gd3+ ion. (d) 3D neutral metal framework of Gd-3D. Gd, purple. C, gray. O, red. H, white.
Figure 1. Structural analysis: (a) The asymmetric unit [Gd(C2O4)1.5(H2O)3]. (b) The connected mode of C2O42− in the 3D framework. (c) The coordination mode of Gd3+ ion. (d) 3D neutral metal framework of Gd-3D. Gd, purple. C, gray. O, red. H, white.
Nanomaterials 15 00032 g001
Figure 2. (a) Magnetic susceptibilities of Gd-3D and Dy-3D in the temperature range of 2–300 K with a direct field of 1000 Oe. (b) The χM−1 vs T curves of Gd-3D and Dy-3D in the range of 2–300 K were fitted using the Curie–Weiss law.
Figure 2. (a) Magnetic susceptibilities of Gd-3D and Dy-3D in the temperature range of 2–300 K with a direct field of 1000 Oe. (b) The χM−1 vs T curves of Gd-3D and Dy-3D in the range of 2–300 K were fitted using the Curie–Weiss law.
Nanomaterials 15 00032 g002
Figure 3. The field-dependent magnetization of Dy-3D at 2.0, 5.0 and 8.0 K.
Figure 3. The field-dependent magnetization of Dy-3D at 2.0, 5.0 and 8.0 K.
Nanomaterials 15 00032 g003
Figure 4. (a) The field-dependent magnetization of Gd-3D in the range of 2.0–10.0 K. (b) −ΔSm value of Gd-3D at various fields and temperatures.
Figure 4. (a) The field-dependent magnetization of Gd-3D in the range of 2.0–10.0 K. (b) −ΔSm value of Gd-3D at various fields and temperatures.
Nanomaterials 15 00032 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, F.-W.; Hong, M.-X.; Wang, X.-T.; Tian, H.; Wang, C.-C.; Zheng, X.-Y. Magnetocaloric Effect in 3D Gd(III)-Oxalate Coordination Framework. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15010032

AMA Style

Lv F-W, Hong M-X, Wang X-T, Tian H, Wang C-C, Zheng X-Y. Magnetocaloric Effect in 3D Gd(III)-Oxalate Coordination Framework. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15010032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Fang-Wen, Mei-Xin Hong, Xue-Ting Wang, Haiquan Tian, Chun-Chang Wang, and Xiu-Ying Zheng. 2025. "Magnetocaloric Effect in 3D Gd(III)-Oxalate Coordination Framework" Nanomaterials 15, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15010032

APA Style

Lv, F.-W., Hong, M.-X., Wang, X.-T., Tian, H., Wang, C.-C., & Zheng, X.-Y. (2025). Magnetocaloric Effect in 3D Gd(III)-Oxalate Coordination Framework. Nanomaterials, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15010032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop