Special Issue “Computational Social Science”
1. Introduction
2. Summary of Articles
- Axiomatisation and Simulation by Klaus G. Troitzsch [14]: In the context of a “non-statement view” of the structuralist program in philosophy of science, the author discusses a research architecture for the role of simulation in the process of theory building. The author claims that computer simulation is a proper way of doing science then applies the formal definition of a theory to historical data of teachers in the “Gymnasien” of Rhineland-Palatinate in Germany by focusing on the estimation of parameters characterizing the probability of a woman replacing a retired teacher at school. The results of simulations (using MIMOSE and NetLogo) are used to validate the empirical data, allowing new insights into this particular historical process.
- Analysis of SAP Log Data Based on Network Community Decomposition by Martin Kopka and Miloš Kudělka [15]: The authors introduce a framework for analyzing SAP log data using network science tools such as community detection methods. SAP is an enterprise resource planning software enabling customers to run their business processes. Due to its large volumes of related log data and their complicated structure, the visualization of the detected communities (or structural patterns) can be useful in supporting management decision making in a company, as the authors show.
- Dynamic Evolution Model of a Collaborative Innovation Network from the Resource Perspective and an Application Considering Different Government Behaviors by Zhaoyang Wu, Yunfei Shao, and Lu Feng [16]: Based on a case study of collaborative innovation networks in China, the authors develop a dynamic evolutionary network model to examine a resource-priority mechanism and the role of government in Chinese society. By comparing the results of three different government policies, the authors conclude that supporting enterprises that have recently entered the network can help maintain its innovation vitality.
- A Novel Approach for Web Service Recommendation Based on Advanced Trust Relationships by Lijun Duan, Hao Tian, and Kun Liu [17]: Web service recommendation and other methods of collaborative filtering are central in managing the massive amounts of information online. In order to decrease the manipulation of web service recommendation systems by malicious users, the authors introduce a new algorithm based on the formalization of a trust relationship between users. By means of an experimental analysis, the authors show that their recommendation system is more effective than current algorithms at resisting malicious attacks.
- Interactional and Informational Attention on Twitter by Agathe Baltzer, Márton Karsai, and Camille Roth [18]: Even though Twitter is often considered a decentralized social platform (in which users receive information from followees and pass it on to their followers), such information processing in terms of attention is not devoid of hierarchy or heterogeneity. In order to further understand human attentional patterns online, the authors study a large corpus of Twitter follower and retweet data. Interestingly, the authors find a “two-level flow of attention” in which users first focus their attention on a core of potentially interesting peers and topics and then distribute their attention uniformly within that core.
3. Outlook
References
- Borgatti, S.P.; Mehra, A.; Brass, D.J.; Labianca, G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 2009, 323, 892–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castellano, C.; Fortunato, S.; Loreto, V. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazer, D.; Pentland, A.; Adamic, L.; Aral, S.; Barabasi, A.-L.; Brewer, D.; Christakis, N.; Contractor, N.; Fowler, J.; Gutmann, M.; et al. Computational social science. Science 2009, 323, 721–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conte, R.; Gilbert, N.; Bonelli, G.; Cioffi-Revilla, C.; Deffuant, G.; Kertesz, J.; Loreto, V.; Moat, S.; Nadal, J.-P.; Sanchez, A.; et al. Manifesto of computational social science. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2012, 214, 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vespignani, A. Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science 2009, 325, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- González-Bailón, S. Social science in the era of big data. Policy Internet 2013, 5, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macy, M.W.; Willer, R. From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2002, 28, 143–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vespignani, A. Modelling dynamical processes in complex socio-technical systems. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barzel, B.; Liu, Y.Y.; Barabási, A.L. Constructing minimal models for complex system dynamics. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Watts, D.J. Computational social science: Exciting progress and future directions. In Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2013 Symposium; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; pp. 17–24. [Google Scholar]
- Pentland, A. Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread—The Lessons from a New Science; Penguin Press: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Salganik, M. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Holme, P. Modern temporal network theory: A colloquium. Eur. Phys. J. B 2015, 88, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troitzsch, K.G. Axiomatisation and Simulation. Information 2019, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopka, M.; Kudělka, M. Analysis of SAP log data based on network community decomposition. Information 2019, 10, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Shao, Y.; Feng, L. Dynamic Evolution Model of a Collaborative Innovation Network from the Resource Perspective and an Application Considering Different Government Behaviors. Information 2019, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, L.; Tian, H.; Liu, K. A Novel Approach for Web Service Recommendation Based on Advanced Trust Relationships. Information 2019, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baltzer, A.; Karsai, M.; Roth, C. Interactional and Informational Attention on Twitter. Information 2019, 10, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holme, P.; Liljeros, F. Mechanistic models in computational social science. Front. Phys. 2015, 3, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overgoor, J.; Benson, A.; Ugander, J. Choosing to grow a graph: Modeling network formation as discrete choice. In Proceedings of the WWW’19 The World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 May 2019; pp. 1409–1420. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Broeck, W.; Gioannini, C.; Gonçalves, B.; Quaggiotto, M.; Colizza, V.; Vespignani, A. The GLEaMviz computational tool, a publicly available software to explore realistic epidemic spreading scenarios at the global scale. BMC Infect. Dis. 2011, 11, 37. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Iñiguez, G.; Jo, H.-H.; Kaski, K. Special Issue “Computational Social Science”. Information 2019, 10, 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100307
Iñiguez G, Jo H-H, Kaski K. Special Issue “Computational Social Science”. Information. 2019; 10(10):307. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100307
Chicago/Turabian StyleIñiguez, Gerardo, Hang-Hyun Jo, and Kimmo Kaski. 2019. "Special Issue “Computational Social Science”" Information 10, no. 10: 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100307
APA StyleIñiguez, G., Jo, H.-H., & Kaski, K. (2019). Special Issue “Computational Social Science”. Information, 10(10), 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100307