article

Free access

Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact

Authors:

T. P. MoranAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, Volume 20, Issue SI

Pages 247 - 252

https://doi.org/10.1145/67450.67497

Published: 01 March 1989 Publication History

Abstract

We assert that the product of user interface design should be not only the interface itself but also a rationale for why the interface is the way it is. We describe a representation for design based around a semi-formal notation which allows us explicitly to represent alternative design options and reasons for choosing among them. We illustrate the approach with examples from an analysis of scrolling mechanisms. We discuss the roles we expect such a representation to play in improving the coherence of designs and in communicating reasons for choices to others, whether designers, maintainers, collaborators or end users.

References

[1]

Allison,G. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Little, Brown and Company, Boston Mass., 1971.

[2]

Bliss,J. Ogburn,J. and Monk,M. Qualitative data analysis for educational research. London, Croom-Helm, 1983.

[3]

Card,S.K., English,W.K. and Burr,B.J. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a crt. Ergonomics, 21,601-613.

[4]

Conklin,J. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20, 17-41, 1987.

Digital Library

[5]

Conklin,J. and Begeman,M.L. gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In Proceedings of CSCW ~8, Portland, Oregon, September, 1988.

Digital Library

[6]

Grudin,J. Designing in the dark: Logics that compete with the user. in Proceedings of CHI$6 (Boston, April, 1986) ACM, New York, 1986, 281-284.

Digital Library

[7]

Guindon,R., Krasner,H. and Curtis, B. Breakdowns and processes during the early acquisition of software design by professionals. In Proceedings of Second Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1987.

Digital Library

[8]

Halasz,F.G., Moran,T.P. and Trigg,R.H. NoteCards in a nutshell. In Proceedings of CHI~GI 1987 (Toronto, April 5-9). ACM, New York, 1987, 45-52.

Digital Library

[9]

Hammond,N., Jorgensen,A., MacLean,A., Barnard,P. and Long,J. Design practice and interface usability: Evidence from interviews with designers. In Proceedings of CHI~3, Boston, ACM, New York, 1983, 40-44.

Digital Library

[10]

Johnson,J. and Beach,R.J. Styles in document editing systems. IEEE Computer, 1988, 32-43.

Digital Library

[11]

Marshall,C. Exploring representation problems using hypertext. In Proceedings of Hypertext $7, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1987.

Digital Library

[12]

Mostow,J. Towards better models of the design process. The AI Magazine, Spring 1985, 44-57.

[13]

Newman,W.M. The representation of user interface style. In Jones,D.M. and Winder,R. (eds) People and Computers /V, CUP, Cambridge, 1988, 123-144.

Digital Library

[14]

Parnas,D. and Clements,P.C. A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-12, 251-257, 1986.

Digital Library

[15]

Petersen,D. Software design capture. Proceedings of Workshop on Visual Languages, August 19-21, 1987, Linkoping, Sweden. 1987.

[16]

Potts,C. and Bruns,G. Recording the reasons for design decisions. MCC Technical report STP-304-87, 1987.

[17]

Rosson,M.B., Maass,S. and Kellogg,W.A. Designing for designers: An analysis of design practice in the real world. In Proceedings of CHI~GI 1987 (Toronto, April 5-9). ACM, New York, 1987, 137-142.

Digital Library

[18]

VanLehn,K.A. Theory reform caused by an argumentation tool. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center Technical Report, ISL- 11, 1985.

[19]

Xerox Corp., ViewPoint Document Editor: ViewPoint Series Reference Library Version 1.1, E1Segundo, Calif., 1986.

Cited By

Niu LOu S(2022)Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic readingAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-020775:6(985-1007)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-0207
Teal GMcAra MRiddell JFlowers PCoia NMcDaid L(2022)Integrating and producing evidence through participatory designCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2022.209690619:2(110-127)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2096906
Ceyssens JCoppers SVanacken DBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Towards Traceable Design Rationale in Augmented RealityExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382835(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480.3382835
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact

Recommendations

Design rationale: the rationale and the barriers
NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles

One goal of design rationale systems is to support designers by providing a means to record and communicate the argumentation and reasoning behind the design process. However, there are several inherent limitations to developing systems that effectively ...
Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact
CHI '89: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We assert that the product of user interface design should be not only the interface itself but also a rationale for why the interface is the way it is. We describe a representation for design based around a semi-formal notation which allows us ...
Scientific design rationale

Design rationale should be regarded both as a tool for the practice of design, and as a method to enable the science of design. Design rationale answers questions about why a given design takes the form that it does. Answers to these why questions ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCHI Bulletin

ACM SIGCHI Bulletin Volume 20, Issue SI

March 1989

374 pages

ISSN:0736-6906

DOI:10.1145/67450

Editors:
K. Bice
Texas Instruments
,
C. Lewis
Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO

Issue’s Table of Contents

CHI '89: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
March 1989
397 pages
ISBN:0897913019
DOI:10.1145/67449
Editors:
K. Bice
Texas Instruments
,
C. Lewis
Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO

Copyright © 1989 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 March 1989

Published in SIGCHI Volume 20, Issue SI

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

94
Total Citations
View Citations
1,635
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)150
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20

Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Niu LOu S(2022)Usability evaluation of two new presentation modes of scientific articles for academic readingAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-020775:6(985-1007)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2022-0207
Teal GMcAra MRiddell JFlowers PCoia NMcDaid L(2022)Integrating and producing evidence through participatory designCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2022.209690619:2(110-127)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2096906
Ceyssens JCoppers SVanacken DBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Towards Traceable Design Rationale in Augmented RealityExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382835(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3334480.3382835
Belkacem IPecci IFaiola AMartin B(2020)Investigating a Design Space for Developing Design Thinking in Electronic Healthcare RecordsHCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case Studies10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_2(19-41)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_2
Orlowski SLawn SVenning AWinsall MJones GWyld KDamarell RAntezana GSchrader GSmith DCollin PBidargaddi N(2015)Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being InterventionsJMIR Human Factors10.2196/humanfactors.43612:2(e12)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2015
https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.4361
Harms JWimmer CKappel KGrechenig TPaternò FSantoro CZiegler J(2014)Design space for focus+context navigation in web formsProceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems10.1145/2607023.2610272(39-44)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2607023.2610272
Schubanz MSeinturier LBuhnova BReussner RSzyperski CWeck W(2014)Design rationale capture in software architectureProceedings of the 19th international doctoral symposium on Components and architecture10.1145/2601328.2601329(31-36)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2601328.2601329
Sosa RLee JAlbarran DOtto K(2014)From Concept to Specification Maintaining Early Design IntentICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 210.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_38(445-457)Online publication date: 24-Dec-2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_38
Nkwocha AHall JRapanotti L(2013)Design rationale capture for process improvement in the globalised enterpriseSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-011-0223-y12:4(825-845)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10270-011-0223-y
Bittar Tdo Amaral LLobato Lde Mattos Fortes R(2013)Applying an Approach to Develop Web Applications Considering Accessibility Practices Using Design RationaleHCI International 2013 - Posters’ Extended Abstracts10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_42(206-210)Online publication date: 2013
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_42
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents