skip to main content
10.1145/501158.501163acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior

Published: 14 October 2001 Publication History

Abstract

As electronic commerce environments become more and more interactive, privacy is a matter of increasing concern. Many surveys have investigated households' privacy attitudes and concerns, revealing a general desire among Internet users to protect their privacy. To complement these questionnaire-based studies, we conducted an experiment in which we compared self-reported privacy preferences of 171 participants with their actual disclosing behavior during an online shopping episode. Our results suggest that current approaches to protect online users' privacy, such as EU data protection regulation or P3P, may face difficulties to do so effectively. This is due to their underlying assumption that people are not only privacy conscious, but will also act accordingly. In our study, most individuals stated that privacy was important to them, with concern centering on the disclosure of different aspects of personal information. However, regardless of their specific privacy concerns, most participants did not live up to their self-reported privacy preferences. As participants were drawn into the sales dialogue with an anthropomorphic 3-D shopping bot, they answered a majority of questions, even if these were highly personal. Moreover, different privacy statements had no effect on the amount of information disclosed; in fact, the mentioning of EU regulation seemed to cause a feeling of 'false security'. The results suggest that people appreciate highly communicative EC environments and forget privacy concerns once they are 'inside the Web'.

References

[1]
Ackerman, M.S., L.F. Cranor and J. Reagle, "Privacy in E- Commerce: Examining User Scenarios and Privacy Preferences", in: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce EC'99, 1999.]]
[2]
Annacker, D., Spiekermann, S., Strobel, M., "E-privacy: A new search cost dimension in online environments", 14th Bled Conference of Electronic Commerce, June 2001, download: http://www.wiwi.hu-berlin. de/~sspiek/phdresearch.html]]
[3]
Ansari A., Essegaier, S., Kohli, R., "Internet Recommender Systems", in: Journal of Marketing Research", Vol. 37, August 2000, pp. 363-375.]]
[4]
Berendt, B. (2000). "Web usage mining, site semantics, and the support of navigation". In: Workshop 'Web Mining for E-Commerce Challenges and Opportunities." KDD 2000, August 2000. Boston, MA. pp. 83-93.]]
[5]
B~umler, H., "Datenschutz im Internet", in: E-Privacy, ed. by Helmut B~umler, Wiesbaden, 2000, pp. 1-8]]
[6]
Berry, M., Linoff, G., "Data Mining Techniques for Marketing, Sales and Customer Support", Wiley, NY, 1997.]]
[7]
Borking, J., "Erwartungen an die Datenschutz-beauftragten im Internet", in: E-Privacy, ed. by Helmut B~umler, Wiesbaden, 2000, pp. 280-290.]]
[8]
Brands, S., "Rethinking Public Key Infrastructure and Digital Certificates - Building in Privacy", Thesis, 1999, 2 nd edition: The MIT Press, August 2000.]]
[9]
Cassell, J., "Embodied Conversational Interface Agents", in: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 4, April 2000, pp. 70-78.]]
[10]
Chang, A., Kannan, P., Whinston, A., "The Economics of Freebies in Exchange for Consumer Information on the Internet: An Exploratory Study", in: Int. Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 4, No. 1, Fall 1999, pp. 85-101.]]
[11]
Clau~, S., K~hntopp, M., "Identity Management and Its Support of Multilateral Systems", accepted for publication in the Special Issue on 'Electronic Business Systems' of Computer Networks; until publication available directly from [email protected].]]
[12]
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/media/dataprot /law/index.htm.]]
[13]
Hagel, J., Rayport, J., "The Coming Battle for Customer Information", in: Harvard Business Review, January-February 1997, pp.53-65.]]
[14]
H~uble, G., Trifts,V., "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids", in: Marketing Science, April 2000.]]
[15]
K~hntopp, M., "Wie war noch gleich Ihr Name? - Schritte zu einem umfassenden Identit~tsmanagement", accepted at the conference VIS - Verl~ssliche IT-Systeme, Kiel, Germany, September 2001.]]
[16]
K~hntopp, M., Pfitzmann, A., "Datenschutz Next Generation"", in: E-Privacy, ed. by Helmut B~umler, Wiesbaden, 2000, pp. 316-322.]]
[17]
Moon, Y.: The Interface Project: http://www.people.hbs.edu/ymoon/Interface/home.html]]
[18]
Moon, Y., Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.27, No.4, March 2000.]]
[19]
Pew Internet & American Life Project, Trust and Privacy Online: Why Americans Want to Rewrite the Rules, 2000-8- 20, http://pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=19.]]
[20]
Pfitzmann, A., K~hntopp, M., "Anonymity, Unobservability, and Pseudonymity - A Proposal for Terminology", in: Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Proceedings of WS on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, LNCS 2009, Heidelberg, 2001, revised version http://www.- koehntopp.de/marit/pub/anon/Anon_Terminology.pdf.]]
[21]
Schaar, P., "Die Moglichkeiten der Datenschutzaufsichtsbeh~rden", in: E-Privacy, ed. by Helmut B~ umler, Wiesbaden, 2000, pp. 69-76.]]
[22]
Schafer J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J., "RS in E-Commerce", in: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce EC'99, 1999, pp. 158-166.]]
[23]
Spiekermann, S., Corina, P., "Motivating Human-Agent Interaction : Transferring Insights from Behavioral Marketing to Agent Design", in: Proc. of the 3 rd International Conference on Telecommunications and Electronic Commerce, ICTEC3, 2000, pp. 387-402.]]
[24]
Spiliopoulou, M., "Web Usage Mining for Web Site Evaluation - Making a site better fit its users", in: Communications of the ACM, No. 8, Vol. 43, August 2000, pp. 127-134.]]
[25]
Urban, G., F. Sultan and W. Qualls, "Design and Evaluation of a Trust Based Advisor on the Internet", MIT, December 1999.]]
[26]
Wells, N. and Wolfers, J., "Finance with a Personalized Touch", in: Communications of the ACM, No. 8, Vol. 43, August 2000, pp. 31-34.]]
[27]
West P., D.Ariely, S.Bellman, E.Bradlow, J.Huber, E.Johnson, B.Kahn, J.Little and D.Schkade, "Agents to the Rescue?", HEC Invitational Choice Symposium, February 1999.]]
[28]
Westin, A., "Harris-Equifax Consumer Privacy Survey", Atlanta, GA: Equifax Inc. (1996).]]
[29]
Vulcan, N., "Economic Implications of Agent Technology and E-Commerce", in: The Economic Journal, February 1999, pp. 67-90.]]

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '01: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce
October 2001
277 pages
ISBN:1581133871
DOI:10.1145/501158
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. automated shopping and trading
  2. legal issues
  3. marketing and advertising technology
  4. privacy
  5. social implications
  6. user interface and interaction design

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

EC01
Sponsor:
EC01: Third ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
October 14 - 17, 2001
Florida, Tampa, USA

Acceptance Rates

EC '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 100 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

EC '25
The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
July 7 - 11, 2025
Stanford , CA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)157
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28
Reflects downloads up to 21 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media