skip to main content
10.1145/383952.383954acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Temporal summaries of new topics

Published: 01 September 2001 Publication History

Abstract

We discuss technology to help a person monitor changes in news coverage over time. We define temporal summaries of news stories as extracting a single sentence from each event within a news topic, where the stories are presented one at a time and sentences from a story must be ranked before the next story can be considered. We explain a method for evaluation, and describe an evaluation corpus that we have built. We also propose several methods for constructing temporal summaries and evaluate their effectiveness in comparison to degenerate cases. We show that simple approaches are effective, but that the problem is far from solved.

References

[1]
J. Allan, J. Carbonell, G. Doddington, J. Yamron, and Y. Yang. Topic detection and tracking pilot study: Final report. In Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop, pages 194-218, 1998.
[2]
J. Allan, H. Jin, M. Rajman, C. Wayne, D. Gildea, V. L. vrenko, R. Hoberman, and D. Caputo. Topic-based novelty detection: 1999 summer workshop at CLSP, Final report. Available at http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/ws99/tdt, 1999.
[3]
C. Aone, M. Okurowski, J. Gorlinsky, and B. Larsen. A trainable summarizer with knowledge acquired from robust nlp techniques. In Mani and Maybury {21}.
[4]
A. Berker and V. Mittal. OCELOT: a system for summarizing web pages. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 144--151, 2000.
[5]
R. Brandow, K. Mitze, and L. Rau. Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Information Processing and Management.
[6]
J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producting summaries. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 335-336, 1998.
[7]
DARPA, editor. Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast news Workshop, Herndon, Virginia, Feb. 1999.
[8]
DARPA, editor. The TDT-2 Text and Speech Corpus, Herndon, Virginia, Feb. 1999.
[9]
R. Donaway, K. Drummey, and L. Mather. A comparison of rankings produced by summarization evaluation measures. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 69-78.
[10]
H. Edmundson. New methods in automatic extracting. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Journal of the ACM.
[11]
T. Firmin and M. Chrzanowski. An evaluation of automatic text summarization systems. In Mani and Maybury {21}.
[12]
F. Fukumoto and Y. Suzuki. Extracting key paragraph based on topic and event detection. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 31-39.
[13]
J. Goldstein, M. Kantrowitz, V. Mittal, and J. Carbonell. Summarizing text documents: Sentence selection and evaluation metrics. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 121-128, 1999.
[14]
J. Goldstein, V. Mittal, J. Carbonell, and M. Kantrowitz. Multi-document summarization by sentence extraction. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 40-48.
[15]
U. Hahn, C. Lin, I. Mani, and D. Radev, editors. Automatic Summarization: ANLP/NAACL 2000 Workshop,New Brunswick, NJ, 2000. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[16]
E. Hovy and C. Lin. Automated text summarization in SUMMARIST. In Mani and Maybury {21}.
[17]
V. Khandelwal, R. Gupta, and J. Allan. An evaluation scheme for summarizing topic shifts in news streams, 2001. Submitted to Human Language Technology Conference.
[18]
J. Kupiec, J. Pedersen, and F. Chen. A trainable document summarizer. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Proceedings of SIGIR.
[19]
H. Luhn. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in IBM Journal of R&D.
[20]
I. Mani and E. Bloedorn. Summarizing similarities and differences among related documents. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Information Retrieval.
[21]
I. Mani and M. Maybury, editors. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.
[22]
I. Mani and G. Wilson. Robust temporal processing of news. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000), pages 69-76, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2000. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[23]
C. Manning and H. Schutze. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.
[24]
M. Maybury. Generating summaries from event data. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Information Processing and Management.
[25]
K. McKeown and D. Radev. Generating summaries of multiple news articles. In Mani and Maybury {21}.
[26]
A. Morris, G. Kasper, and D. Adams. The effects and limitations of automated text condensing on reading comprehension preformance. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Information Systems Research.
[27]
S. Myaeng and D. Jang. Development and evaluation of a statistically based document summarization system. In Mani and Maybury {21}.
[28]
NIST. Proceedings of the tdt 1999 workshop. Notebook publication for participants only, Mar. 2000.
[29]
NIST. Proceedings of the tdt 2000 workshop. Notebook publication for participants only, Nov. 2000.
[30]
M. Oka and Y. Ueda. Evaluation of phrase-representation summarization based on information retrieval task. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 59-68.
[31]
M. Okurowski, H. Wilson, J. Urbina, R. Clark, T. Taylor, and F. Krapcho. Text summarizer in use: Lessons learned from real world deployment and evaluation. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 49-58.
[32]
J. Pollock and A. Zamora. Automatic abstracting research at chemical abstracts service. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science.
[33]
J. Ponte and W. Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 275-281, 1998.
[34]
D. Radev, H. Jing, and M. Budzikowska. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation, and user studies. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 21-30.
[35]
G. Rath, A. Resnick, and T. Savage. The formation of abstracts by the selection of sentences. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in American Documentation (now JASIS).
[36]
H. Saggion and G. Lapalme. Concept identification and presentation in the context of technical text summarization. In Hahn et al. {15}, pages 1-10.
[37]
G. Salton, A. Singhal, M. Mitra, and C. Buckley. Automatic text structuring and summarization. In Mani and Maybury {21}. Originally published in Information Processing and Management.
[38]
R. Swan and J. Allan. Automatic generation of overview timelines. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 49-56, Athens, Greece, 2000. ACM.
[39]
M. Witbrock and V. Mittal. Ulta-summarization : A statistical approach to generating highly condensed non-extractive summaries. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pages 315-316, 1999. Poster description.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '01: Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
September 2001
454 pages
ISBN:1581133316
DOI:10.1145/383952
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. experimental design
  2. metrics
  3. summarization

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGIR01
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGIR '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 47 of 201 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media